In post 1374, RadiantCowbells wrote:I feel like your posts are melodramatic and heavily scripted and that if you were town they'd feel less manufactured.
FA, Flubber claimed gladiator. Gladiator can choose a target during day, then the lynch can only come from those two targets. It makes no sense for scum to take that role, and if we come to doubt him we can ask him to prove it by using it. That leaves Ranger. We need a wagon. Please join me.
I'm NOT!
Why would we want to waste the action of 3 different players to check on one? Tracker better be tracking a suspect. Doctor better be protecting the Tracker or the Coroner. 3 Bussing actions should be enough to confuse the hell out of the mafia.
It's a bit too complicated still, but I'm working on a plan in which ONLY FA will announce her target. That will be the only slot which will not be considered for a bus action (bc it's already protected). The rest of the actions will go unannounced as normal, and we will compare the results in the morning, starting by the least trusted. (This is to know if they are telling the truth, so it will be conclusive for/against them).
@Prsivul: In THIS setup Gladiator picks at night, not day. "Target a player during the night. If they are alive at daybreak, players may only vote for you or them." (http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?tit ... Idea_Mafia)
I'm reluctant to vote now bc I have yet to finish the working plan of the night. I have yet to decide on whom I'm bussing FA with, or the two other people of the 2nd bus action. I feel like I don't need to protect myself, bc bussing is resolved first, so if I die the action will still go through and info will be available for the town anyway. I think FA also needs to decide on her target so that we won't consider them for the bussing tonight. (If they do get bussed, then one of the bus drivers is definitely scum)
That's different, and it's even more likely to be chosen by town. Re: RC's point, this can't be used to take the heat off a scum partner who unexpectedly got wagoned.
Scum. You previously narrowed it down (incorrectly) to Ranger and Flub based on claims. Now that you know Flub made a claim that's likely to be town, you logically should be voting Ranger.
In post 1392, Persivul wrote:Scum. You previously narrowed it down (incorrectly) to Ranger and Flub based on claims. Now that you know Flub made a claim that's likely to be town, you logically should be voting Ranger.
I CAN'T SEE WHY A GLADIATOR IS A TOWN CLAIM
AND WHY ARE YOU CALLING ME SCUM - BECAUSE DOCTOR IS A MORE TOWN CLAIM
AND I REALLY CAN'T UNDERSTAND WHY CRONER IS A SCUM CLAIM
- You narrowed down your lynch pool to Flub and Ranger
- A wagon is building on Ranger
- You now refuse to vote Ranger
You should logically be voting Ranger. If you won't, that means putting Ranger in your lynch pool was distancing, which you thought was safe for awhile as you didn't expect a Ranger wagon.
I'm town, but I think your previous list which showed several roles as potentially scum was on the right track. Limiting the choices to Ranger and Flubber feels wrong. Further limiting it to just one of them feels even more wrong.
Wanna play Minecraft with your ms friends? Check out the minecraft thread, or the channel on discord
Scum. You previously narrowed it down (incorrectly) to Ranger and Flub based on claims. Now that you know Flub made a claim that's likely to be town, you logically should be voting Ranger.
This makes it sound like you think FA has eliminated everyone but Ranger and Flubbernugget as possible scum. Is that what you're saying? And where did you get it from?
Wanna play Minecraft with your ms friends? Check out the minecraft thread, or the channel on discord