Open 43 - C9+2 GAME OVER before 499

[Mastermind of Sin]

TylerJ, would you like to actually analyze your summary of people's actions? All you did was list off what people have done in the game. You haven't said what you think about it, or given any actual real analysis.

[ryan]

Goddamn. If I was mafia with Setael and ChocolateAttack, we'd be the best damn mafia ever. I don't think the three of us have been on the same side of an argument all game.

Distance much?

[TylerJ]

sure.

[TylerJ]

Looking through this, I realize that perhaps some of MoS'es actions would have been avoided if in fact he were mafia. For instance. I don't think an expeirenced player would have lurked if he was truly mafia, you get targeted to quickly. However, on the flip side, He was online, but seemed not to post on here for a while. Hmmm. Either he did forget about this game or he is covering up.

I notice that His playing style is rather harsh and prideful. This in itself doesn't constitute guilt. But perhaps the most convincing is this: The fact that he tends to twist peoples words around and point fingers is what cathes me. he wants people to look scummy when they don't. Now, I can see how a regular townie might just attempt to find the mafia and over exagerate on every little thing, but like this? That is what catches my suspicion.

Mr. Pigg: Is suspicious merely because he rarely posts.

Ryan doesn't seem scummy with anything he has done so far.

Deathsauce hasn't done anything that screams mafia yet.

CA pressure voted and bandwagoned, it seemed like he was too eager to lynch some people.

Fernando misuderstood some posts, but other than that, nothing of consequence.

Thinktank: not enough info.

Setael: I think my post about her was an analysis rather than just some brief explanation of what she did.

[xyzzy]

Mr.PiGG has picked up his prod.

Vote Count Number Five (Five to lynch)

Setael (thinktank, MoS, Tylerj)

FeRnAnDo (DeathSauce)
MoS (ChocolateAttack, ryan)
ChocolateAttack (Mr.PiGG)
TylerJ (Setael)

Not voting: FeRnAnDo

This VC is accurate as of THIS POST.

[Mastermind of Sin]

Goddamn. If I was mafia with Setael and ChocolateAttack, we'd be the best damn mafia ever. I don't think the three of us have been on the same side of an argument all game.

Distance much?

Obviously. Good job checking your facts before making random accusations.

Unvote, Vote: Ryan

Someone's not paying attention and just wants to find a reason to attack people.

[ryan]

Goddamn. If I was mafia with Setael and ChocolateAttack, we'd be the best damn mafia ever. I don't think the three of us have been on the same side of an argument all game.

Distance much?

Obviously. Good job checking your facts before making random accusations.

Unvote, Vote: Ryan

Someone's not paying attention and just

wants to find a reason to attack people

.

Pretty much just like your reason for voting me than eh? You just said that you Setael and Chocolate Attack haven't been on the same side of an argument all game, basically saying trying to say that you don't agree on anything? It's a fair question. You are obviously trying to say that you three couldn't be on the same side because you don't agree.

[Mastermind of Sin]

Yup, I am saying that. And if you weren't just flailing around for a reason to attack me, you...wouldn't be attacking me for this...

[ryan]

I'm flailing to get discussion going again and obviously it worked.

[ChocolateAttack]

CA pressure voted and bandwagoned, it seemed like he was too eager to lynch some people.

Im too eager to lynch some people? if that is the fact then shouldn't i be sticking my vote for the one with the most vote rather hoping around?

You don't know what is a quick lynch, do you?

[ryan]

^^^^ I'm not sure how you have been eager to do much of anything, this is your first post in what two weeks?

[TylerJ]

Yeah, I do. Why are you being so defensive. I wrote an analysis that is all. I realize what your saying ryan, but it could be that he changed his strategy after others called him on it. Besides CA, I only FOS'ed you, I didn't vote for you. I need a lot more evidence before I think your vote worthy.

[ryan]

I suppose TylerJ, but we do have more than our fair share of lurking going on

[thinktank]

unvote: Setael

Way past random voting stage. I think we have our fair share of aggressive players. At this point I'm equally suspicious of everyone.. Whenever a player seems to make an accusation, it gets responded to with more agresive accusations, and all the while no real information is being extracted. 7 pages and all the votes seem to be on different wagons.

[ryan]

Pressure Vote

Unvote/Vote: Setael

You still haven't answered my question two pages ago and you've been quiet (to say the least)

[ChocolateAttack]

Yeah, I do. Why are you being so defensive. I wrote an analysis that is all. I realize what your saying ryan, but it could be that he changed his strategy after others called him on it. Besides CA, I only FOS'ed you, I didn't vote for you. I need a lot more evidence before I think your vote worthy.

I think i haven't be defensive enough yet since your analysis indirect but explicitly leading people into thinking i am scum. Read your analysis back, it wasn't much of an analysis, it either "not enough info" or "they doesn't look scum to you" but except for me, you actually got an analysis and point finger toward me.

Fos: TylerJ

for post such "scumdar" (also i think scumdar is really scum, scum finding scum!)

[ryan]

CA: What about our lurkers, any thoughts on them?

[TylerJ]

I might not be able to get on until tuesday and thursday.

CA I attempted to write with what little info I had. I knew there wasn't enough info, but I was attempting to get the game rolling. It seems that everytime I get on either I was the last to post or only one other person posted. So much for my failed attempt at picking this game up.

Seriously, everything I have posted within the past week feels utterly useless. The very few posts that have been made lately have been in response to my comments. We are getting nowhere in this game. With as little as the information I have I am shooting in the dark with only the moon as light. Of course with that moon I can see some faces that look like CA, MoS, and Setael. Ryan is the only other one that is still posting, but he dosn't strike me as suspicious.

[ChocolateAttack]

CA: What about our lurkers, any thoughts on them?

Nope, the game is slow so i didn't pay much attention to lurkers

[Setael]

You still haven't answered my question two pages ago and you've been quiet (to say the least)

Was this directed at me? It appears as though it was since it came with your vote on me, but I'm confused because I don't remember you asking me a question and I looked back a few pages and don't see any, and I've hardly been quiet. Can you give me a post # where I can find that question?

Jordan's reaction to my case was decent and he has been acting pretty Town lately so for now

Unvote

.

I have a feeling all the scum are just lurking. I'd like to hear more from Fernando and Mr. Pigg.

[ryan]

You still haven't answered my question two pages ago and you've been quiet (to say the least)

Was this directed at me? It appears as though it was since it came with your vote on me, but I'm confused because I don't remember you asking me a question and I looked back a few pages and don't see any, and I've hardly been quiet. Can you give me a post # where I can find that question?

Jordan's reaction to my case was decent and he has been acting pretty Town lately so for now

Unvote

.

I have a feeling all the scum are just lurking. I'd like to hear more from Fernando and Mr. Pigg.

I can't find it either. I know I posted on Friday night and asked you about your late unvote and also who your top suspects were at the time, but it doesn't seem to be here, maybe I screwed up when I posted, I'm not sure. Anyway, consider these my questions.

[Mastermind of Sin]

I'm flailing to get discussion going again and obviously it worked.

So now that you've admitted to flailing, would you like to explain to me what was wrong with your argument, in order to prove to me that you aren't just backing off to get me less suspicious of you?

[ryan]

I admitted to putting something to get discussion moving and just because you didn't agree with it doesn't mean it's a bad idea. This game is dragging ass right now. I'm not backing off my suspicions on you as I do still feel you are scummy, but I'm more interested in somebody who I feel is lurking, hence my pressure vote on Setael. I still feel you are trying to distance yourself from your possible scum partners, THAT is why I responded "distance much?" Is this such a difficult argument? You made a big deal of not agreeing with two players in the game, I called you on it and you reacted quite quickly. Shouldn't be much discussion needed on that point, you did exactly what I predicted you would do. (Dropped an OMGUS vote on me and than whined about my accusation)

[Mastermind of Sin]

I see that you still don't see the problem with your accusation. I made my post about not agreeing with two players partly in jest, partly with the hope that I would trap a scum who tried to push me on that comment. I feel that I've trapped you, and so far it looks like I have. You were too eager to put more suspicion on me to actually stop and think about the facts.

[ryan]

Oh please MoS, you had no plan with your comment except to distance from a couple of your scum buddies. If you did it in jest where was the proof with a smiley face, a just kidding comment or something to show the game you were joking? It wasn't there and now you're trying to spin things in your favor.