NY 193 : Werewolf Mania (GAME OVER- TOWN WIN)

Xkfyu · Post Post #425 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 7:07 am

In post 424, JarJarDrinks wrote:Back to this:

In post 363, SilverWolf wrote:Right, I didn't like that post. His later posts after that look better.118 and 196 don't strike me as something scum would push.
What would be the benefit to it?

You're trying to turn this around. I'm not trying to debate Almosts towniness w/ you. I'm trying to figure out why you flipped your read of him. Cause these 2 statements seem to conflict

In post 106, SilverWolf wrote:97 bugs the shit out of me as well, just pings hard
In post 345, SilverWolf wrote:
Because of the way he's trying to self sacrifice himself
and the way he claimed VT just doesn't strike me as any benefit to scum. It looks very genuine to me.

Why did 97 ping you hard?

You should have quoted the whole post, where she said 97 pinged hard, to show in full context how strongly she felt about her scum read on him. Here it is:

In post 106, SilverWolf wrote:VOTE: Almost 50

Jesus, could this be any more scum? Damn

Like, 58 immediately wanting to target lurkers is scummy cuz most people haven't even posted yet and scum like to pick on inactives cuz it looks like scum hunting but gets almost no return pressure

69 78 "if I was scum" stuff is overly concerned about appearances and how people approach him

97 bugs the shit out of me as well, just pings hard

JarJarDrinks · Post Post #426 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 7:08 am

Like this seems like a pretty strong scumread for you to abandon.

In post 106, SilverWolf wrote:VOTE: Almost 50

Jesus, could this be any more scum? Damn

Like, 58 immediately wanting to target lurkers is scummy cuz most people haven't even posted yet and scum like to pick on inactives cuz it looks like scum hunting but gets almost no return pressure

69 78 "if I was scum" stuff is overly concerned about appearances and how people approach him

97 bugs the shit out of me as well, just pings hard

As I've said, this really looks like opportunistic scum.

Like town sentiment was very anti-Almost when u posted this and it looks like you trying to get on the wagon early. Then when town sentiment was more pro-Almost, you abandoned the read. And you gave no reason for switching to a townread until you were asked.

pedit: already ahead of u

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #427 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 7:17 am

VOTE: BlackStar

I'm comfortable voting this while I continue catching up.

BlackStar · Post Post #428 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 7:19 am

@RC Still sore about the last game? Lol

I think everyone should look at snarkysnowman's ISO. He basically just parked his vote on JarJar and then vanished

JarJarDrinks · Post Post #429 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 7:21 am

In post 423, BlackStar wrote:Did you not see the post where I said I was playing
devil's advocate
there?

Xkfyu · Post Post #430 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 7:24 am

BlackStar · Post Post #431 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 7:24 am

In post 429, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 423, BlackStar wrote:Did you not see the post where I said I was playing
devil's advocate
there?

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #432 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 7:32 am

In post 428, BlackStar wrote:@RC Still sore about the last game? Lol

I think everyone should look at snarkysnowman's ISO. He basically just parked his vote on JarJar and then vanished

Why would I be sore?

I won, I have nothing against you even if you had won because you were only playing your wincon. If I was being snappy with Persivul for Almost50 you might have a case.

JarJarDrinks · Post Post #433 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 7:32 am

Oh, it's an 80s movie meme-off? I'm game:

Ricastle · Post Post #434 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 7:43 am

In post 419, Xkfyu wrote:
Ok, your second paragraph is complete nonsense, especially in D1, like we are. Unfortunately though, this debate isn't going anywhere, and we're just going end up going around in circles. So, I suggest we shelve this disagreement for now, since there are much more important matters to discuss that need take precedence.

Fine by me, pal. You just go on your jolly old way, now, and convince yourself that you were right.

BlackStar · Post Post #435 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 7:46 am

In post 432, RadiantCowbells wrote:
In post 428, BlackStar wrote:@RC Still sore about the last game? Lol

I think everyone should look at snarkysnowman's ISO. He basically just parked his vote on JarJar and then vanished

Why would I be sore?

I won, I have nothing against you even if you had won because you were only playing your wincon. If I was being snappy with Persivul for Almost50 you might have a case.

I was joking, man

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie · Post Post #436 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 8:39 am

In post 256, Nero Cain wrote:I'm also debating weather or not I find

In post 145, BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote:First, I think we're out of rvs so, UNVOTE:

scummy.
Like on one hand its a true statement but on the other I feel like there was no rean to really annouce it...like he was afraid of leaving his vote on his RVS target and I'm not sure that comes from town.

How is this scummy? I'm pretty sure if I just unvoted I'd have you asking me why, and I don't feel that any of my reads so far necessitate a vote. We have time, and at this point I couldn't even tell you who my rvs vote was on.

In post 266, JarJarDrinks wrote:Only a little of what I read of his town game on this site. I haven't bothered with his off site games.

Seems weird that you'd defend his play in this game then. Why would you think this sort of play was normal for him? I feel like seeing that his play this game was similar to the scum game u played w/ him should give you the OPPOSITE opinion.[/quote]
I plan on forming most of my read on almost based on his actions rather than tone. Its not so much that I think hes innocent as that I don't trust any opinion I have of him right now. 269 does make good points. I'll keep this in mind.

I'm not caught up on all the seer business as of this post.

Nero Cain · Post Post #437 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 8:53 am

In post 436, BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote:and I don't feel that any of my reads so far necessitate a vote

What are these reads?

JarJarDrinks · Post Post #438 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 9:04 am

fixed ur formatting

In post 436, BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote:
In post 266, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 436, BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote:Only a little of what I read of his town game on this site. I haven't bothered with his off site games.
Seems weird that you'd defend his play in this game then. Why would you think this sort of play was normal for him? I feel like seeing that his play this game was similar to the scum game u played w/ him should give you the OPPOSITE opinion.

I plan on forming most of my read on almost based on his actions rather than tone.
Its not so much that I think hes innocent as that I don't trust any opinion I have of him right now. 269 does make good points. I'll keep this in mind.

Then it seems even wierder that you'd tell people to check his meta. Like, we should pay attention to his tone but you're not gonna?

Keyser Söze · Post Post #439 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 9:14 am

I won't be able to post my catchup/thoughts/reads until tomorrow - there is another current game approaching deadline (less than 24 hours).

ika · Post Post #440 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 9:45 am

I'll respond tonight I'm on break

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #441 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 9:48 am

game's on pause anyway.

Golden Robster · Post Post #442 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 10:09 am

Not going to be here for the next two days because of an interview for med school (nervous as hell)

ika · Post Post #443 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 10:19 am

mod I have to replace out due to slot being compermised, I'll pm reasons tonight

SilverWolf · Post Post #444 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 10:22 am

@mod, I have to replace as well due to slot now being compromised. I will send you a PM.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #445 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 10:22 am

People please >.<

Xkfyu · Post Post #446 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 10:27 am

In post 443, ika wrote:
mod I have to replace out due to slot being compermised, I'll pm reasons tonight

In post 444, SilverWolf wrote:
@mod, I have to replace as well due to slot now being compromised. I will send you a PM.

What the hell does "the slot has been compromised" even mean?

Nero Cain · Post Post #447 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 10:28 am

they prob told each other their roles.

BlackStar · Post Post #448 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 10:29 am

In post 446, Xkfyu wrote:
In post 443, ika wrote:
mod I have to replace out due to slot being compermised, I'll pm reasons tonight

In post 444, SilverWolf wrote:
@mod, I have to replace as well due to slot now being compromised. I will send you a PM.

What the hell does "the slot has been compromised" even mean?

It means that we were right about them being scum and now they're running away

Nero Cain · Post Post #449 (ISO) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 10:29 am

also thank fuck Ika is gone.