In post 740, Xkfyu wrote:Why do you like it now, and are so convinced by it, when pisskop mentions it, but you didn't comment on it before, when at least one other person (can't remember who) originally brought it up.
In post 743, JarJarDrinks wrote:In post 736, Almost50 wrote:I also don't like the composition of the wagon on pisskop to be totally honest.
What don't u like about it?
In post 751, Almost50 wrote:Well, the fact that that I scum reading 3 of the 5 voting pisskop, for instance.
In post 750, Almost50 wrote:In post 740, Xkfyu wrote:Why do you like it now, and are so convinced by it, when pisskop mentions it, but you didn't comment on it before, when at least one other person (can't remember who) originally brought it up.
If you can't remember who then I think you'll excuse me for not noticing it to begin with.
In post 576, JarJarDrinks wrote:just had a thought:
Silver and Ika said they have a Hydra together. Maybe they're both scum here and were using the hydra thread to discuss this game (basically illegal daytalk)?
In post 587, Nero Cain wrote:In post 583, BlackStar wrote:Do you think the mod would tell us what happened if we asked?
no. I still think they likely talked to each other about the game outside. There IS a possibility that Ika just didn't want me to death tunnel him but since the mod said they were contacting a site mod this is very likely to be a rule break.
In post 674, SnarkySnowman wrote:Pretty sure we should ignore it, and it's not alignment indicative - my best guess is the two somehow figured out each other's alignments and requested to be replaced because of it.
In post 753, JarJarDrinks wrote:In post 751, Almost50 wrote:Well, the fact that that I scum reading 3 of the 5 voting pisskop, for instance.
who?
In post 756, Almost50 wrote:both Nero & Snarky did not specify "Hydra". JarJar is the one town lean on the wagon that I'm not paying much attention to anymore.
Now there's a great big difference between "talking to eachother about the game" and UNINTENTIONALLY giving it away. The first is outright cheating, and it doesn't explain why they themselves asked to be replaced. The second -however- is something that could very well happen when one is not paying much attention while talking about a totally different subject.
Now, you're free to accept this or dismiss it. It does not change the fact that pisskop put it in a way that I liked.
In post 760, Almost50 wrote:@JarJar: BeBop is the one I'm leaning town on AND will still be listening to his reasoning.
In post 759, Xkfyu wrote:How do you feel about the wagon now?
A little better. Still it doesn't change the fact 2 scum leans are still on it. In post 761, JarJarDrinks wrote:So you're scumreading Ricastle, Nero , IAI?
In post 762, Almost50 wrote:In post 759, Xkfyu wrote:How do you feel about the wagon now?
But, listen.. why would you think the composition IS the key word here? I don't scum read pisskop in the first place. The composition of his wagon is a secondary reason not to vote him though.
In post 766, Xkfyu wrote:My read on you keeps bouncing back and forth between town and scum at an alarming rate
In post 767, RadiantCowbells wrote:hey yall buttfaces I'm going to die tonight and I want to lynch scum before I do
vote Ricastle.
In post 764, pisskop wrote:Why IAI? Of the 3, hes the one I have the least experience with.
In post 765, JarJarDrinks wrote:And is there a reason you were sitting on scumreads that were keeping to urself? Last thing you said about nero and ricastle was they were null.