Mini 422 - Paranoia Mafia - Game Over

[chaotic_diablo]

Next? Fonz and killajay claimed townie, you claimed redirector, and flay claimed an investigative role. That's everyone.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

I didn't realize Fonz had claimed in full.

[Thesp]

Daycycle 5 Tallying of Troubleshooters

Not Voting

- 5 (Mr. Flay, killajay, The Fonz, chaotic_diablo, The Central Scrutinizer)

With 5 clone templates still with us, a vote of 3 is sufficient to present for the "usual treatment of traitors".

[The Fonz]

Bah, and I'm guessing you have an explanation?

Killajay did not NK last night. I trust TCS, and am more inclined to trust Flay than you. Therefore, it follows that you likely performed the NK.

Vote: Chaotic Diablo

[chaotic_diablo]

Bah, and I'm guessing you have an explanation?

Killajay did not NK last night. I trust TCS, and am more inclined to trust Flay than you. Therefore, it follows that you likely performed the NK.

Vote: Chaotic Diablo

I fail to see why you would trust Flay more than me. So I'd like an explanation.

[Mr. Flay]

Still here. Still not ready to vote.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

So.

[Mr. Flay]

Where. The. Hell. Is. Everyone?

No lynch-jumpers tells me either one of c_d/Fonz is scum, or we're not actually in lynch-or-lose. Therefore

Vote: The Fonz

- I don't like his reasoning behind that vote, as it smacks of trying to get me on his side. Maybe this is perverse/wrong, but we need SOME sort of movement...

[The Fonz]

Yes, that's right, Flay, there's so little reason to vote for the guy who's barely registered on my radar for good or ill, all game, over the guy who has consistently given me the impression that he's viewing the game from a similar perspective to mine, (see your replacing in and appearing to spot the same kinda thing in PWS as I did, amongst others). I could be wrong. But I believe TCS, therefore Killajay did not NK, and I find your claim stronger, and your general play townier, than CD's. Hence, the vote.

[chaotic_diablo]

Yes, that's right, Flay, there's so little reason to vote for the guy who's barely registered on my radar for good or ill, all game, over the guy who has consistently given me the impression that he's viewing the game from a similar perspective to mine, (see your replacing in and appearing to spot the same kinda thing in PWS as I did, amongst others). I could be wrong. But I believe TCS, therefore Killajay did not NK, and I find your claim stronger, and your general play townier, than CD's. Hence, the vote.

What exactly makes Killajay less suspicious than me? TCS's result simply states that Killajay didn't perform the kill. It does not say that Killajay isn't scum. This is a perspective that Flay himself brought up. This leads me to doubt whether you trust Flay as much as you do. Your vote is based on the level of "trust" a player has. Therefore logically Killajay should be much higher on your suspicion list than I and earn your vote. Since that isn't the case, we can look into your statement that "cleared" Killjay: TCS's result. But wait, Flay already argued that statement.

Then you have the statement that Flay's claim is "stronger". Flay claimed an investigative role that doesn't work. How is this any different from claiming a townie? It isn't stronger at all.

[Mr. Flay]

Frankly, I'd still rather lynch Killajay because of those quicklynches, but with TCS' "clearing" I don't see any chance of that today. Then again if he's town, do we dare leave him alive until tomorrow to be the scapegoat in lynch-or-lose?

[Mr. Flay]

Are we deadlined? Why not?

I convinced myself in my last post:

Unvote: The Fonz, Vote: killajay

- gotta go with what both my head and gut say.

[Thesp]

Daycycle 5 Tallying of Troubleshooters

Chaotic_diablo

- 1 (The Fonz)

killajay

- 1 (Mr. Flay)

Not Voting

- 3 (killajay, chaotic_diablo, The Central Scrutinizer)

With 5 clone templates still with us, a vote of 3 is sufficient to present for the "usual treatment of traitors".

[Thesp]

killajay has been prodded.

[killajay]

I have read back through and I am thinking we can live with...

VOTE: No Lynch

My reasoning for being quiet... PC issues

[chaotic_diablo]

I have read back through and I am thinking we can live with...

VOTE: No Lynch

My reasoning for being quiet... PC issues

I'm not following the no lynch rationale. Please explain a bit more.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

I'm voting for either c_d or Fonz today. No other.

[Mr. Flay]

I have read back through and I am thinking we can live with...

VOTE: No Lynch

My reasoning for being quiet... PC issues

I'm not following the no lynch rationale. Please explain a bit more.

Ditto; I think this means "I can live with not being lynched today..."

[The Central Scrutinizer]

I'm no sure why this game is so inactive. That it is makes me somewhat afraid that there are actually two scum left, lurking to kill us all at lylo.

But if you guys don't care about this game, neither do I.

Vote: The Fonz

[Mr. Flay]

I care, I just don't know what else to say that hasn't been said...

[The Fonz]

I don't see any case on me...

[chaotic_diablo]

I'm no sure why this game is so inactive. That it is makes me somewhat afraid that there are actually two scum left, lurking to kill us all at lylo.

But if you guys don't care about this game, neither do I.

Vote: The Fonz

Alright, neither do I.

vote Mr. Flay

[Mr. Flay]

If we all vote for one other person, do you think the Computer will just kill us all?

Why are you voting me, c_d?

[chaotic_diablo]

If we all vote for one other person, do you think the Computer will just kill us all?

Why are you voting me, c_d?

Fonz is voting me because he doesn't trust me, not because he can find anything scummy off me. TCS is voting Fonz without an explanation. You're out to get Killajay yet haven't made a reasonable case other than his two quicklynch scenarios. Killajay is voting no lynch for reasons he hasn't explained. If everyone else gets a crappy vote that doesn't do anything, then I get one to.

Just kidding. To me, your -1 lynch on Peter really bothers me. Apparently you stated that it was "mercy killing" and you needed to find the "truth". I took that as a sign as though you were desperate and accepting enough to let Peter get lynched. When Killajay obliged and you jumped on it, it bugged me. You also stated in a previous post about the risk of going -1.

Hammering is placing the lynching vote. A risk of being at lynch-1 in the vote count is that scum (or anyone) can lynch you before you have a chance to respond.

I really want to hear from The Fonz, if that was an ability claim.

Using that logic, you risked placing peter at -1 so that he wouldn't have a chance to respond when quick lynched. I'm sure this probably isn't the case, but as I said, it bugs me.

Then your claim comes in. Your role does absolutely nothing. You also refer to ideas that others have brought up to support your claim. Bastard moddery from Peter and player interference from me. In addition, I'm not quite sure what's the purpose of searching for mutants. Even if you could determine who is a mutant or not, how exactly does this fit into the theme or benefit town for that matter? Even when you investigated Sefer who had "Machine Empathy" a definite scum mutant power listed in one of the paranoia links, you didn't catch anything. Let me quote the sentence.

Mutations include abilities such as invisibility or pyrokinesis, ranging to largely harmless ones such as a constant runny nose, to more exotic ones such as machine empathy (the only mutation that invariably leads to termination when discovered).

You are a townie with a glorified power that doesn't do anything.

Those are the only things I have to support my vote. Other than that, I'm just sitting here twiddling my thumbs.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Why am I voting for Fonz? Because this game gives the the distinct gut feeling that I'm being wooled. Fonz is usually a lot more pressing in hunting scum. I haven't seen anything great from him yet.