Open 43 - C9+2 GAME OVER before 499

[ryan]

Seriously if everyone went by gut feelings in this the game it'd be a crap shoot. There is no evidence that I'm scum and yet you and MoS are grasping at straws in voting me and attempting to lead bandwagons on me

[Mastermind of Sin]

Uhh, ryan???

I'm voting TylerJ.

[ChocolateAttack]

Sorry people! i have 2 mid term this week and a project, i have no time to play, i post this in all my game and i didn't make any reading but i try to come back right after i finish with my mid terms.

[TylerJ]

I was disagreeing with MoS when he was trying to push for you. But when he put pressure on you, you didn't do so hot. Lets all vote CA for lurking and coming up with a lame excuse to do so. j/k.

[ryan]

What's the latest on FeRnAnDo?

[Mastermind of Sin]

Sorry people! i have 2 mid term this week and a project, i have no time to play, i post this in all my game and i didn't make any reading but i try to come back right after i finish with my mid terms.

QFT

[DeathSauce]

Lets all vote CA for lurking and coming up with a lame excuse to do so. j/k.

At first I didn't see the "j/k" and thought "Wow, that is majorly scummy." And then on second look I saw it and realized that I still think it's scummy, even with the "j/k".

HoS: TylerJ

[ChocolateAttack]

CA: I don't hold the same impression of CAs early play as my predecessor, it's almost always the subtle stuff from the random phase which helps, people who posture and stay under the radar rather people who stick out like sore thumbs need watching more a lot of the time.

unvote

That not true, town best defend is lay low, not just scum and beside, this game is goin slow because of the inactive players (which sometime including me because of my busy life and sorry about that) so i couldn't tell which is which so i decided to lay low.

[ChocolateAttack]

I was disagreeing with MoS when he was trying to push for you. But when he put pressure on you, you didn't do so hot. Lets all vote CA for lurking and coming up with a lame excuse to do so. j/k.

Wow! what should i do with this post? even noted the end with j/k, your post could really let me to an end. jk or not who know, may be you were intented to lead people into voting me. Also, you change your tone 360, you from reply to Ryan to shift every body attention to me.

MFOS

Tylerj

[ChocolateAttack]

I'm thinking it's ryan and vampyrusddg. I'll keep my vote where it was for now. Oh, and thanks for replacing. Welcome!

Why do you think both Ryan and Vampy are the scum pair?

[TylerJ]

wow, that's pathetic, you can't take a joke people. For now on don't joke, or else you might be FOS'ed, or worse, voted for.

I'm sorry guys that isn't scummy, thats down right rude. Thats so annoying, ruin the fun why don't you. CA I posted the exact same think in the other game we were playing. Not one person jumped on me for it. And its at the beginning when people make big deals out of everything.

By the way CA, are you done with your mid terms? I still wish you luck, even after being so rude.

[xyzzy]

I'm currently looking for a replacement for FeRnAnDo. On an unrelated note, go sign up for nanowrimo.

[xyzzy]

JDodge replaces FeRnAnDo.

[JDodge]

(insert generic "I'll reread later" thing here)

[TylerJ]

hey Jdodge, how goes it?

[Mastermind of Sin]

JDOUDGE IS HERE OUMGZ!

[vampyrusddg]

Welcome Jdodge

At the moment I'd say my prime suspects would be Ryan and Setael.

Ryan: I find his play very scummy, after replacing in a game with him in and replacing in another where he had already been lynched I find his general argumentitive style of play scummy, but just because he's always scummy doesn't stop him from being scum.

Setael: So far his posts can be divided into 2 categories, #1 defensive over very small mentions, #2 oppurtunistic early votes on wagons or attempts to start them over very minor things.

vote Setael

He looks like scum to me, Ryan to me is a 50/50 chance, but Setael looks scummy as hell

[ryan]

So arguing is scummy? Interesting take Vamp, wrong, but interesting.

[vampyrusddg]

So arguing is scummy? Interesting take Vamp, wrong, but interesting.

Arguing with one line retorts is, debating issues back and forth and putting your view of it across is another thing altogether, a lot of your posts fall into the former category which just encourage your target to come back with similar one liners and everyone else stays out of the way while it's going on, take a look back at your own posts and see how your quips stop the town communicating for a while, it's harmful to those who are scum hunting.

[ryan]

Hey I can't take credit for having a few people in this game who are just being assholes when it comes to reasoning for votes. Also if you notice I bring up failures to have cases on me with people who vote. I haven't stopped one town conversation in this entire game, the only thing that has stopped things are players who are lurking, players who don't present a case on why they vote, and useless responses like the one I felt compelled to respond to your "Ryan isn't scum hunting he's hurting the town by talking" if you want want less of me, I'm fine with posting once a week in this thread on what I've seen, say the word.

[TylerJ]

ryan I think everyone has come up with slightly good reasons to vote for you. Vamp, I like the fact that you mentioned he usually acts scummy, I might take another closer look at my assesment.

Back to you ryan, we don't want you to stop talking, that would be worse. We need you here.

[ryan]

I act scummy? Well that's a new one, I'll file that away in my "What a stupid freaking line and thanks for sharing" list of things. Seriously, I've attacked who I've felt needed attacking and now I'm scummy for doing it? Good lord is this gonna be a fun game to try and attack scum when I'm already looked upon as scummy, this will be REAL fun now.

[Setael]

Setael: So far his posts can be divided into 2 categories, #1 defensive over very small mentions, #2 oppurtunistic early votes on wagons or attempts to start them over very minor things.

Can you please quote some examples of this? I assume you're talking about my vote on Fernando but you said "votes". Were you just trying to exaggerate, or do you have further examples? Also, please quote this defensiveness over very small mentions.

[TylerJ]

your welcome for sharing.

[DeathSauce]

I'm happy with my vote.

MOD:Please note that I have unvoted and subsequently voted ryan