Mini 497 - Game Over

Flameaxe · Post Post #400 (ISO) » Wed Oct 17, 2007 8:27 am

HELLO TO YOU ALL, IT SEEMS THAT IM REPLACING INTO THIS HERE GAME, WHO ARE TEH SCUMZ?

kabenon007 · Post Post #401 (ISO) » Wed Oct 17, 2007 8:32 am

No, CKD, I just don't want to vote, have you at -1, and then have people who are suspicious of you, who could be scum, vote for the hammer. We need information, not just a lynch. A lynch is necessary, but information takes precedence. That being said, I am going to put you at -2. I am comfortable with that.

vote CKD

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #402 (ISO) » Wed Oct 17, 2007 8:38 am

kabenon007 wrote:No, CKD, I just don't want to vote, have you at -1, and then have people who are suspicious of you, who could be scum, vote for the hammer. We need information, not just a lynch. A lynch is necessary, but information takes precedence. That being said, I am going to put you at -2. I am comfortable with that.
vote CKD

that being said, are you comfortable with your voting partners thus far?

Sephiroth · Post Post #403 (ISO) » Wed Oct 17, 2007 8:45 am

curiouskarmadog wrote:my point is here, what you call "appeals to emotion" do not = scum.

correct. appeals to emotion = scummy. Multiple appeals to emotion in combination with other tells = scum.

Flameaxe wrote: HELLO TO YOU ALL, IT SEEMS THAT IM REPLACING INTO THIS HERE GAME, WHO ARE TEH SCUMZ?

try reading. I have recently presented my case on CKD, and Ckd also posted a case on me earlier.

Flameaxe · Post Post #404 (ISO) » Wed Oct 17, 2007 8:47 am

Try reading in 2 minutes. Maybe you didn't notice the fact that I sorta replaced IN THE LAST POST. /sigh.

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #405 (ISO) » Wed Oct 17, 2007 8:54 am

Sephiroth wrote:
curiouskarmadog wrote:my point is here, what you call "appeals to emotion" do not = scum.
correct. appeals to emotion = scummy. Multiple appeals to emotion in combination with other tells = scum.

you are wrong..again (yeah yeah yeah, when have you been wrong before)..Have you started preparing your Day 2 explanation yet?

I will enjoy the end game conversation...

kabenon007 · Post Post #406 (ISO) » Wed Oct 17, 2007 8:55 am

Does it matter? There opinions do not influence mine. I am my own person and fomulate my own opinions. What was the point in asking me this?

kabenon007 · Post Post #407 (ISO) » Wed Oct 17, 2007 8:56 am

Shit, I can't spell... there=their...

Sephiroth · Post Post #408 (ISO) » Wed Oct 17, 2007 9:01 am

curiouskarmadog wrote: you are wrong..again (yeah yeah yeah, when have you been wrong before)..Have you started preparing your Day 2 explanation yet?

these kind of comments sure arent helping you. In the time it took you to make this post you couldve easily have actually responded to some of my most recent attacks on you. But you make another appeal to emotion, and also once again just state your opinion without arguing you point. Anyways, I don't expect I'll need an explanation tomorrow, I think you're scum. Thats why my vote is on you.

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #409 (ISO) » Wed Oct 17, 2007 9:04 am

kabenon007 wrote:Does it matter? There opinions do not influence mine. I am my own person and fomulate my own opinions. What was the point in asking me this?

the answer might be important Day 2, since me/duster have been the only votes you have placed all game, I wanted the town have that input.

...I am going to try to help the town as much as I can until my last breath.

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #410 (ISO) » Wed Oct 17, 2007 9:05 am

Sephiroth wrote:
curiouskarmadog wrote: you are wrong..again (yeah yeah yeah, when have you been wrong before)..Have you started preparing your Day 2 explanation yet?
these kind of comments sure arent helping you. In the time it took you to make this post you couldve easily have actually responded to some of my most recent attacks on you. But you make another appeal to emotion, and also once again just state your opinion without arguing you point. Anyways, I don't expect I'll need an explanation tomorrow, I think you're scum. Thats why my vote is on you.

what is the point?..

Sephiroth · Post Post #411 (ISO) » Wed Oct 17, 2007 9:07 am

The point? You asked me a question. I answered it. Also, in light of your post claiming to try to help the town as much as possible, your post certainly doesnt help the town at all, simply once again assert that I'm scum. Also it's more evidence against you, and I dont see any point in NOT including it, so I did.

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #412 (ISO) » Wed Oct 17, 2007 9:07 am

it will take me a good hour to break it all down, and then you will go line by line again..it pyramid of words will be huge, and people wont bother reading it...

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #413 (ISO) » Wed Oct 17, 2007 9:08 am

what is the point of address the line by line of your "new" attacks.

JDodge · Post Post #414 (ISO) » Wed Oct 17, 2007 9:10 am

Vote Count

:

curiouskarmadog (5): vampyrusddg, -TinVision-, Sephiroth, joost, kabenon007
-TinVision- (2): destructor, OpposedForce
kabenon007 (1): Shanba
Sephiroth (1): curiouskarmadog
Atticus (1): Aimee
vampyrusddg (1): Atticus

not voting (1): Flameaxe

Seven to lynch.

Current Player List

:

Atticus
curiouskarmadog

(replaces dusterhan)

-TinVision-
destructor
joost
OpposedForce

(replaces Knuck)

kabenon007
Shanba

(replaces Nirp)

Sephiroth
Aimee
Flameaxe

(replaces SilverPhoenix)

vampyrusddg

(replaces Nekka-Lucifer)

joost · Post Post #415 (ISO) » Wed Oct 17, 2007 9:26 am

Yeah I think it's best to wait for input of others before starting a new Sephiroth-CKD discussion. I'm particularly interested in Destructors opinion.

Sephiroth · Post Post #416 (ISO) » Wed Oct 17, 2007 9:37 am

joost wrote:Yeah I think it's best to wait for input of others before starting a new Sephiroth-CKD discussion. I'm particularly interested in Destructors opinion.

Fine. I'll wait for a while.

kabenon007 · Post Post #417 (ISO) » Wed Oct 17, 2007 11:28 am

Just because my vote has only been on one person does not mean I think you/duster are the only ones I find scummy. It's just that you two have given me significant reasons to vote you, so why should I back down?

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #418 (ISO) » Wed Oct 17, 2007 11:58 am

I didnt ask you to back down. Excepted my fate (for the most part) I am asking you to comment Day 1 on who else you feel is scummy

Atticus · Post Post #419 (ISO) » Wed Oct 17, 2007 12:16 pm

I have not quite finished reading all the posts, I was not on yesterday.

However, after reading through page fifteen, I want to lynch CKD for being a total jackass.

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #420 (ISO) » Wed Oct 17, 2007 12:40 pm

drop whatever insults you need to, I dont take it personally...being a "jackass" does not say I am scummy. I am sure your vote will come with an explanation?..please tell me how I am being a jackass, as well

Atticus · Post Post #421 (ISO) » Wed Oct 17, 2007 12:48 pm

Eh, I didn't say being a jerk made you scummy. That's just one of the things I am constantly tempted to throttle people for.

Atticus · Post Post #422 (ISO) » Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:03 pm

joost wrote: - CKD's attempt to "discredit" Sephiroth by withholding information from him.
- CKD's appeal to emotion. I have not brought this up before but I agree with Kabenon and Seph on this.Townies should attack on arguments not on feelings.
- "ok if I am hung, and I come up town" We will see that when your dead, won't we? If you are hung and you come up town, I will reasses your posts. But I doubt you will.

I think this perfectly describes your jerkiness (decided to tone down language for childrens) even though I believe joost used it for another reason.

Flameaxe · Post Post #423 (ISO) » Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:25 pm

I don't really see how that makes him a jerk honestly...It seems more like scummy behavior to me.

destructor · Post Post #424 (ISO) » Wed Oct 17, 2007 3:26 pm

Wow, a lot's happened. I'm posting to say I'm here and still in. I'll give this all a read and post any thought's I have soon.

I did notice in my skim that OpposedForce and Aimee haven't posted in a long time. Some prods would be nice, I think, particularly on Aimee.