Garnasha wrote:waar seemed just to have looked back through the thread looking for a nice target.
No, I saw who I found the scummiest, explained my case, and voted. That's not scummy.
Battle Mage wrote:relentless and foolish bandwagonning. :p
It wasn't a bandwagon, I was the 3rd vote on curiouskarmadog and I unvoted when he got to 7 votes. That is by no means a bandwagon, and if that is your only reason for voting for me then there are much, much better targets.
Porochaz wrote:His reaction to CKD's "over reaction" seems forced, therefore
Hey he was the scummiest at the time so I stated my reason and voted for him. You should be thanking me for stabbing the retarded joke vote phase in the heart. I'm sorry if my reaction to curiouskarmadog seems forced, I don't know how to defend myself against that.
Garnasha wrote:So I voted the one who really got the BW going, that being waar.
You can't blame the first few people for a bandwagon, they don't control how other people vote. That's just ridiculous.
ChronX wrote: I very much agree with garnasha's rationale in post 188 for his vote on waar, he says it more succintly than I managed to last night.
Vote: Waar
for reasons posted in #174 (my post where I FoS him)
Is there a reason you aren't stating your case with the vote and just telling us what number post in the thread your reasoning is, without even a link to it? As far as I'm concerned the reason you gave for this vote is "yeah I agree" to somebody else.
Garnasha wrote:If he really thought it that suspcious he'd have reacted instantly.
Does evidence in Mafia have some sort of statute of limitations? I can't use something unless it's been a certain amount of time since it was posted? Noted.
In closing I feel that the votes against me have very weak arguments for the reasons I stated in this post.