Food Fight Mafia - WHO OWNS THE SCHOOL???

[Gorrad]

I'd assume people who have things like M&Ms or Peanut-butter Cookies have a good deal of them, as they come in packs. They could be our FoSs. People with less than five items probably have all big, so they can only vote. So as an FoS, throw small items, as a Vote, throw big ones. As it is:

Squish Gummy Bear on waar's head

. Way to be condicending, dude. Repeating memes is usually taken as funny in today's culture, so seriously, lrn2lol.

[Gorrad]

Given the size of the classic M&M container, the potential damage of the pellets, and the amount of sugar in an average lunch, I would postulate that skitzer's lunch box contains 15 M&Ms, with a margin of error of +- 5, depending on how cool his mom is.

[Gorrad]

Eww, that's gonna make a mess. A stinky, fish-smelling mess. Are you sure you should be flinging food like that so early?

[Gorrad]

You want to start scumhunting, go right ahead, I'll probably join you. For now, it seems the others are content to toss their cookies, and I'm trying to figure out some of the mechanics of the game.

[Gorrad]

Maybe the way it's used effects the amount of damage. Here, this is a test, and refects nothing upon personal FoSs. Please, no one pelt these people until the damage is listed:

Squish gummy bear in Battlemage's hair.

Flick gummy bear at Blight's shirt.

[Gorrad]

Gah! I've been pruned! Oh what a world, what a world...stupid prune ><. I've learned to generally trust mods to, when asked if can I do something, respond with 'try it and find out'. Blame it on a few years of having Eletriar DM for me, but I've learned not to fully trust moderators of a game.

[Gorrad]

i'm in. Now join the Gorrad wagon already. lol

Oh yeah, mindless bandwagoning. I'm sure that that is the ONLY way to win a food fight. No strategy should be used in a battle, as it will lead the town to failure 100% of the time. [/sarcasm]

Seriously, this is the closest thing to a scumtell I've seen this game so far. I'm going to

Unofficial Vote: Battle Mage

, I think the system is a good asset in this game. The time for random votes is over, and we have a good idea of the mechanics. Let's buckle down and start working. There is nothing to be gained at this point from a bandwagon on ANYONE at this point, except for an understanding of what kind of night actions we're going to have, and that's certainly not worth the lack of discussion/scumhunting.

BM, please explain yourself

[Gorrad]

GAH! ONIONS! Getemoffgetemoffgetemofff......phew, that's over. BM, it's not that I'm worried by your vote, I'm worried by the bandwagon aspect. I really dislike bandwagoning, and find it scummy as hell. If you had voted for me and NOT called it a wagon, I'd be fine. Heck, even in a game of no real votes, the idea of a wagon is a bad one, and I would have reacted the same way even if the wagon was on someone else. Feel free to vote however the heck you like, just don't frikkin' bandwagon!

[Gorrad]

Mod: Skitzer is hit a few posts before the count, but he shows up as clean on the list. Did the food not effect him, or was that thrown while the list was being compiled?

[Gorrad]

VOTE: Yamahako

Any reason?

[Gorrad]

Gods, ok, this is a bandwagon with votes that DO count! Seriously, Bandwagoning = BAD! Yamahako's food flinging is scummy to me too, but that doesn't warrant a bandwagon!

*sigh* at least this will shed some light on the mechanics.

[Gorrad]

Gods, ok, this is a bandwagon with votes that DO count! Seriously, Bandwagoning = BAD! Yamahako's food flinging is scummy to me too, but that doesn't warrant a bandwagon!

aren't we supposed to be trying to wagon scummy players????

i mean i get that the damage is irrevocable (sp?), but the goal is to try and lynch scum still...

Lynch, yes, wagon NO! If you're gonna throw something, throw it, but give a reason! Otherwise scum can throw all their food one one person, give no explanation, and have no one question their motives. Even if you aren't wagoning, not giving explanations earns you a gummy bear.

Blowgun gummy bear at Pickem

[Gorrad]

I'm fine with throwing. Throw all you want. What I DON'T want is a mindless bandwagon. Mindless bandwagoning happens when people don't say WHY they're tossing their cookies. That's why I dodn't like Yama's throws, because he often (although not always) don't explain why he's doing it. It's why I didn't like the mashed potatoes or 7-up! No explanation as to why. I agree he's scummy, but I want an explanation when you throw. You do that, I'm happy.

[Gorrad]

I didn't say he didn't. I'm asking you to clearly state a reason when throwing. Even if the reason seems to you to be obvious. It's good for future reference, helps prevent the twisting of words, and can stop bandwagons.

[Gorrad]

That last post was in reference to JDodge. And Erg0's point helps mine. I didn't remember 139, and if JDodge had quoted it or referenced it in any way, I would have been satisfied. There's a good reason I'm asking for reasons- order is the way to go! This is a logical game, so I ask for logical actions.

Live long and prosper.

[Gorrad]

I think the votes are self explainable.

Think

what you may have done which would have caused me to vote you. Clearly, this is not as hard as playing shogi.

I actually can't say. Nor would i say even if i did know, because that would allow you to throw suspicion around without doing any of the work yourself. So please, drop the lazy gene, and tell us what you're thinking.

Good Posting!

QFT. Posting without giving reasons just gives room for misinterpretations. We don't need any of that here.

[Gorrad]

I see the merit in testing. Yama, the vote count has backed up your points.

Unvote: Yama

In fact, it's a pretty good idea to know exactly how much our stuff does d1.

Peel Banana, squash it in Sir Tornado's hair, and carelessly discard peel on floor

. I really didn't like the four undescriptive votes followed by refusal to explain. Please, no one throw at him until the next count.

[Gorrad]

Whoops, I didn't see the prune. Also, while my description doesn't specifically state nerd, and I have no post restriction, it does fit the assigned character. Besides, RPGs are fun.

[Gorrad]

Yeah, that was me being stupid. When I posted, I was looking at the bottom of page nine, and hadn't seen page 10 yet. Hence why I also added on the talk of roles and RP.

[Gorrad]

Hey, just a heads up: My monitor's broken, so posting will be sporadic for a short period. Sorry for any inconvenience.

[Gorrad]

Well, I'm back, but have very little time to make a thorough post. I should be able to do so this evening though. A summary of my thoughts so far:

Jester- unlikely, unless they can't self-vote.

Bad Behavior Notes- if they ARE NK-items, then perhaps the hall monitors are weeding out the rowdy kids.

Scum- I'm thinking a BM-Sir T pairing isn't out of the question. They could quite well be distancing, and the whole idea of BM ignoring SirT even though he thinks scum/jester screams scumbuddies.

Silent Speaker- good last post! Do you think you could add quantities thrown to those figures? I have a feeling that'll help later.

I'm really not seeing Skruffs as scum. His play seems to be in-line with his normal town play.

That's a summary. I'll give y'all the day to think about/respond to this, then post some more this afternoon.

[Gorrad]

Jester- unlikely, unless they can't self-vote.

You mean throw food on themselves ?

Yeah, of course. Y'know, it wouldn't hurt to see if you could do that.

squish gummy bear on own nose

. Please don't go 'OMG self-vote scumtell!!!!1', this is purely for experimentation.

As for Aimee, my gut says town. I admit I wasn't paying close attention to her during my readthrough, and I don't think she's posted a lot, but the vibes are town so far.

Grr, I meant for this to be longer, but it turns out I don't really have anything more to say . Maybe tommorow.

[Gorrad]

Gah! Onions! They make me cry on the inside (and outside if they're chopped). Where's the love for the lobsterfrogman?

(Bonus points if you get the reference)

[Gorrad]

Ok, the onions kinda screwed up my test, but, just eyeballing it, it looks like you can indeed throw food at yourself. Y'all may want to see for y'all's selves though. I'm not sure how accurate my eyeballing is.

[Gorrad]

It doesn't look like the BB note does anything noticable, else DGB would have said so last post. That said, I'm thinking that BM's note could be one of the fake ones, hence why no mention as made, and that combined with the cream pie (stupid move IMHO) makes me fairly confident that this will hit scum.

Splatter Mock Chicken Sandwich on Battle Mage

.

Well, that's all my food except some more bears.

[Gorrad]

It doesn't look like the BB note does anything noticable, else DGB would have said so last post. That said, I'm thinking that BM's note could be one of the fake ones,

hence why no mention as made

, and that combined with the cream pie (stupid move IMHO) makes me fairly confident that this will hit scum.

Splatter Mock Chicken Sandwich on Battle Mage

.

Well, that's all my food except some more bears.

erm, i dont get this post. Please explain the bit in italics-your grammar confounds me. I'd also like you to explain why me throwing fake food to get a reaction off Skruffs (which was remarkably successful) was a 'stupid move'.

BM

Hence why no mention was made by DGB. I was shocked that there was no content attached to it, and assumed that there would be for a real one. Of course, then Pickem quoted the rules...I didn't remember the part about the secret count.

As for the cream pie, while you did get a reaction, you lied big time to do so. It was NOT obvious that you were joking, not even kinda obvious. A cream pie, in my opinion, would not be out of place in an incontinent German's lunch box- it's soft (easily digestable) and fattening. What we need in an odd setup like this is honesty. We need to know how much effect items have, we need all actions explained and supported, and we do NOT need lies! It may be ok in a normal set up to lie, but here we're all kinda in the dark, especially pro-town. The more we figure out, the more likely we are to suceed- your 'cream pie' hampered that! Town doesn't need to keep people in the dark, except about roles. Scum do.

Therefore, you lie-you're scummy!

[Gorrad]

...Skruffs, can I quote that third line there?

[Gorrad]

Is that fo' reals? Either Skruffs pulled a BM and lied about his throws, or he has some weak food!

[Gorrad]

Ha! Lunchlady, that's hilarious. Well, I'm still convinced at BM's scumminess, this only supports my case. BM, you're scummy as hell, probably because you're scum.

Dumps all remaining gummy bears on Battle Mage

.

[Gorrad]

I believe Skruff's claim. Senile and old = a weak digestive system. Also, there's probably a mix of adults/students that are trying to take over (two groups, perhaps?) so we can't take age as a scumtell.

As for your claim, I fail to see why the librarian would be in the lunchroom at all! At all the schools I've been to the library was open during lunch. The librarian ate lunch there, and didn't go to the cafeteria. So if anything, your claim would be the one I'm suspicious of.

I also don't see where in the quote of Skruffs you gave he said that being an adult was scummy. He just said you were an adult. I didn't think there would be any adults in this game, so the fact that he did makes me think that he knew there were, because he was one.

[Gorrad]

Not the onions again :*(. I said it only helps my argument because I completely believe Skruff's claim. The fact that he's pro-town implicates BM to a degree, which stacks on all the other reasons I suspect BM.

[Gorrad]

Skruffs said that

not all

of his BB notes were real. That makes me think some of them were, supporting his claim. Also, there's probably some kind of safety patrol that can issue them.

[Gorrad]

I believe Skruff's claim. Senile and old = a weak digestive system

Erm, what? This is a food FIGHT, not an eating contest. Our digestive systems have nothing to do with it. Skruffs is claiming that his old, senile, resilient dinnerlady has some kind of special weakness to

food

. Do you see now why i find this so utterly and plainly ridiculous?

BM

I'm saying this by the same reasoning that anorexic = sesitive.

Also, lunch ladies eat the food they make, right? That food is bloody awfull, and usually squishy! So yes, I believe that there's a weak digestive system, so that hard foods do more damage than soft.

[Gorrad]

I'm kinda doubting that many adults other than the lunch lady would be very pro-student, and her only because she's senile. Yes, BB notes could be scummy, but that doesn't mean that a senile person who is in a position of power couldn't have them to help the town. Skruffs, any light you could shed on those notes would be helpful.

[Gorrad]

Ok then. Old = physically weak, how's that? Even one with experience defending would still get hit! Picture a lunchlady, one old enough to be senile, getting hit with a hotdog. Even if her extra-slow reflexes could allow her to, say, pull up a tray to defend herself (which they probably wouldn't), she'd still have the shock of the hotdog on the tray to hold up against. If she dodged, she'd probably fall to the ground!

[Gorrad]

I might as well clarify, I DID dump all remaining items on you, BM. You've been the recipient of everything but the banana. And the Roast Ox? BM, meet your Petard- let the hoisting begin. Your picture of a lunchlady differs radically from mine- the ones at my school were nice! Librarians hate roughhousing and would want to put a stop to it by almost any means neccesary. The fact that you're saying one would actually throw food back, though, is ludicrous. A senile Lunch Lady- that I can believe.

[Gorrad]

AH! The pudding! It burns, it burns, it's...chocolate ><. Never mind. Tar, can you tell us which of those are real? I'm not asking you to do it now, you probably have reasons for keeping them secret, but I'd like to know purely for data purposes.

BAttle Mage, when you are wrong, and you sabotage a game (like you are trying to do in this game) do you ever actually consider "Hmm. Maybe I should reconsider my 'BM is right despite the influence of logic and reality on my assumptions' playstyle, it really doesn't seem to help anyone but scum. Like. Ever." and then maybe edit your playstyle to tone it down? Because I called out this method of playign already:

QFT

[Gorrad]

BM, there is a VERY good reason I want to know which of those foods was real. Y'all will understand later, but for now y'all have to trust me.

[Gorrad]

Gorrad voted BM over what looks like OMGUS. He added:

I think the system is a good asset in this game. The time for random votes is over, and we have a good idea of the mechanics. Let's buckle down and start working. There is nothing to be gained at this point from a bandwagon on ANYONE at this point, except for an understanding of what kind of night actions we're going to have, and that's certainly not worth the lack of discussion/scumhunting.

1. By "the system is a good asset" do you mean the food throwing can be used to get scum? If so, a) duh. and b) why are you not using it?
2. How, exactly, do you propose we "buckle down and start working"

without

casting votes, or equivalently food?
3. What do you mean, nothing to be gained from a bandwagon on anyone? Aren't you looking for reactions from people?
This post does

not

fill me with confidence in Gorrad.

1. The system reffered to was the vote system, which unfortunately seems to have fallen out of use. Also, I'd like to add that if you'd actually read the latest posts, I HAVE been using food...I have none left!

2. The first point negates this. I wanted people to start voting with reasons. Some people were still goofing off.

3. A bandwagon is one person saying 'hey, this guy is scummy, lynch!' and others hopping on with no reason other than that the first guy said so. This is a BAD IDEA! This is a game of logic. Therefore, we should USE logic.

Seriously, dude. Read what's been going on, not what has been. You completely misinterpretted this post, showed that you were not up to date by asking why I wasn't throwing food, and called a very scummy manuever OK.

Vote: TSS

[Gorrad]

Nope, no restriction, as I stated earlier. I do most of my reactions because they fit the role I was given, not because there was a given restriction.

[Gorrad]

so you are breadcrumbing an OMGUSsy teenager?

Oh ha ha. I meant the talks of data, the reactions towards food, and my need to know what Tar actually threw.

[Gorrad]

Maybe that's why the peas did nothing- no way for them to stick.

[Gorrad]

Yeah, my PM has nothing but a name and that I'm a student (and one more thing I'm not saying yet). No win conditions, no alignment (other than student), no nothing.

[Gorrad]

Ewwwwww, there's no way that human flesh can be good for the human body, we'd all get a rash!

I'm willing to think that, with the amount of creativity available in flinging food, that it's not out of the question to think NKs could be the same way. This could very well be an attempt at framing Skruffs, someone else could have used the cauldron, or it's just DGB's renowned...creativity.

Also, there were two seperate NKs. You claim that Skruffs is scum because he works where the murder occured. Does this mean you think that there's two scum groups? I think that we have the Aministration-scum and an SK or Vig from the way the murders were described. This would, by your reasoning, make Skruffs NOT scum, but still have an NK.

Do you think of Lunch Ladies as admins? I sure don't. Librarians, on the other hand, are hired for being neat, orderly, and proper, as well as for literary knowledge. It's a much more dignified position that Lunch Lady, which requires much less administrative skill.



Here are points I'm almost sure of from last night:

1. The administration is out to get us, and is probably enlisting help from brownnosing students.

2. There is at least one mafia group (administration) which is trying to expell and fire those in their way. I think the odds of another group are not large.

3. There is an SK or Vig who is killing their victims.

4. Not all adults are bad guys, even if they work in administrative positions.


Nothing has come up since yesterday that has changed my opinion- let he who is without sin

Cast the first Banana at BM

[Gorrad]

The way I see it, the first kill was made by the administration-mafia. Administration is used in the literal sense here. There's usually a group of high-ups in the school called the administration- this includes principal, vice-principals, department heads, and other people who don't teach but handle administrative affairs. This would sometimes include the librarian, but never the lunch lady. In this scenario, they are getting rid of students- probably budget cuts or something (http://www.scarygoround.com/index.php?date=20051011).

[Gorrad]

Given the flavor behind the second kill and something I spotted shortly before yesterdays lynch (but didn't have time to comment on) that makes me less certain that Battle Mage is guilty, Skruffs is currently higher on my scumdar.

Care to elaborate?

[Gorrad]

Okay.
"1. The administration is out to get us, and is probably enlisting help from brownnosing students. "

Gorrad, where did you form this hypothesis - with the brownnosing students corollary?

If it was purely adults, we could lynch every adult and win, despite some being pro-town. There has to be a mix, otherwise it would be too easy. Do you really think there would be a game- a DGB game at that- where rolenames would be dead givaways?

Also, erg0, Sir T has it right. The secretary was a renegade.

[Gorrad]

Tar, I find your withholding information infuriating. I'm trusting you, even though you did not trust me earlier, but I find your uncooperativeness scummy. Scum have more to hide than town.

[Gorrad]

The only information I REALLY want is your food, because what you threw earlier poses a direct threat to my health. Otherwise, it's up to you to claim or not, but if your claiming gives us more insight, I don't know why you wouldn't. That's why I'm trusting you, because I don't know your role, and you do.

[Gorrad]

Allergy.

[Gorrad]

Yes. Thank you. I didn't want to specify, as now scum have a weapon against me, but that was my concern.

[Gorrad]

I don't understand the question, Skruffs. Why would I use the allergy to not scumhunt? I'm pro-town, scumhunting is kinda what I'm supposed to do.

[Gorrad]

I have no known connection to Aimee.

[Gorrad]

I'm not willing to count out Godfather, but I'll hold my fire for now. Thanks, Tar- that information is very useful. BM, it seems I *may* owe you an apology. However, I still think Skruffs is town. Your points against him have been poor, and I think y'all need to bury the hatchet- in scum.

[Gorrad]

No, in fact I am saying the exact opposite. The ONLY reason I'm not still fighting BM is the cop result, although your sanity point is valid (especially considering cheerleaders). I find you town. I have not said otherwise. In fact, I said in my last post 'However, I still think Skruffs is town.' I believe one of these to be true, on order of likelyhood (most to least).

1. Bad read on Tar's part
2. Skruffs and BM both townies
3. BM Godfather
4. Skruffs is scum

I'm more than willing to put that down as a misread on your part, Skruffs. There's no way you could twist what I said to mean what you meant, so you misread.

[Gorrad]

Huh, that's interresting, Jordan. TSS's role would support that to an extent, but how would you explain how he would protect against kills like the boiled-alive? He seems to me more like a Doc against only one type of kill, meaning another Doc would be existant for the other kind.

[Gorrad]

Erm, Tar, you keep talking about breaking the setup in half...care to elaborate what that entails?

[Gorrad]

That's your call and yours alone.

[Gorrad]

I was worried due to an allergy, I thought we had cleared that up already. I think the bickering's either between two townies, or, more likely, BM is scum who avoided detection (I figure if anyone could do that, it's be a librarian or a principal). Either way, he has been majorly rolefishing, and I'm confident that he's been lying about BB notes. Plus, would you really trust a cheerleader's gossip?

Throw five gummi bears at BM

. I'll keep some still for later.

[Gorrad]

GAH!!!! Fish in hair! Do you know how long I'll have to scrub to get this stuff out? Why?!?!? What have I done? You give no reasons!

Flail gummy bear at mneme

Oh, also, I'm pretty much convinced on the BM is scum front. Deadline's approaching, and I want this sorted out once and for all.

Hurl Mock Chicken Sandwich at Battle Mage

[Gorrad]

Have you not been reading the arguments? BM's case is full of shit, he's claiming different BBN rules than Skruffs, and he said he had a win condition when others, myself included, did not. I don't care what Tar said, the logic against him is just too overwhelming. He could be insane, he could be scum, he could have been mixed up. Any of those I would not be surprised to be true of a cheerleader. Plus, cheerleader/mason? That's a pretty OP role, I'd expect a limitation. There are too many factors for me to be sure of Tar's accuracy. I stand by my BM-is-scum statement.

[Gorrad]

Ikura are salmon eggs, gorrad. Not all sushi are fish; the only constant is rice and nori.

I don't need to "give a reason" -- you've given us enough of them. Your OMGUS included.

sends a grape-jelly and cabbage sushi roll spinning into Gorrad's face

Yes, you do. If no one gave reasons, the scum could run wild and there'd be nothing to stop them. It's a game of logic, so use it!

[Gorrad]

Excellent!

[Gorrad]

ABR, you're either jester or incredibly stupid scum, and either way you're a detriment to the town.

Sprinkle remaining gummy bears on the food pile that is ABR.

[Gorrad]

Look in the proverbial mirror.

[Gorrad]

That's not a pun, it's a reference. And pardon me for looking at what someone posts rather than what they sign.

[Gorrad]

My role links me to no other players, you very clearly stated that you had a win condition, and I put Tar-scum as only one of the options. Furthermore, if you think ABR's claim is BS, why the hell would he be town! Seriously, there's no way you're not scum!

[Gorrad]

Ok, anyone want to back this up? You're right, I've only played one game with ABR, and that one had no roles to claim. If others can back you up on this, I'm willing to let that point against you and him drop, but my other points are more than enough for me to recognise you as scum.

[Gorrad]

1. The difference in BB notes

2. The win condition

3. The craplogic/ad hominem attacks

4. You say 'I'm not exactly convinced of Fonz being scum either, but of the two, he is a better play.' If you think ABR's a bad player, why do you agree with him about Fonz? So far, all I can see against Fonz is that ABR counterclaimed, which you yourself said was BS.


I have more, but those are off the top of my head. I've been arguing against you for pages, far before the Tar claim even came up. You're by far the scummiest player here. If you aren't lynched tommorow (since it's fairly obvious people agree with me about ABR today) I will be sorely disappointed.

[Gorrad]

Ok, BM, I did what you reccomended. I waited a while and reread. Now, honestly, with you clarifying the BB note rules with DGB, as well as a cop clearing both you and Skruffs, I'm willing to believe a lot more that you both are town. ABR, now that Fonz is dead and telling the truth, would you care to elaborate on your claim? The ferocity with which you attacked him, as well as your counterclaim, makes you top of my list now.

Also, it looks like we have two scumgroups (soup and admins), as well as an SK. The SK gave the head injury, the soup boiled then bashed (makes sense that they would kill Fonz. Human flesh is a strange ingrediant.), and the admins fired then expelled. The SK N1 must have failed to get through.

Chuck single gummy bear at ABR.

I'll throw more soon, but I want to see their damage today. Also, on similar lines, maybe the reason for the 100 peas is that, once he's dead, the amount of food will drop dramatically and the rest of the food will do more damage. Just a thought.

[Gorrad]

Ok, BM, I did what you reccomended. I waited a while and reread. Now, honestly, with you clarifying the BB note rules with DGB, as well as a cop clearing both you and Skruffs, I'm willing to believe a lot more that you both are town. ABR, now that Fonz is dead and telling the truth, would you care to elaborate on your claim? The ferocity with which you attacked him, as well as your counterclaim, makes you top of my list now.

Also, it looks like we have two scumgroups (soup and admins), as well as an SK. The SK gave the head injury, the soup boiled then bashed (makes sense that they would kill Fonz. Human flesh is a strange ingrediant.), and the admins fired then expelled. The SK N1 must have failed to get through.

Chuck single gummy bear at ABR.

I'll throw more soon, but I want to see their damage today. Also, on similar lines, maybe the reason for the 100 peas is that, once he's dead, the amount of food will drop dramatically and the rest of the food will do more damage. Just a thought.

I was clearly only following Tar because he looked like he knew wtf he was doing.

Interresting. I thought you were going after him because y'all had the same flavor. Care to clarify?

[Gorrad]

ABR, here. I think I may not have been clear. Did you lie about your flavor?

[Gorrad]

Ok, I'm willing to believe you more now. We know there are multiple mason-cops, so several fat-cops is a distinct possibility. I didn't know that Tar's partners were ALSO mason-cops yesterday, or I wouldn't have been so hard on you.

Mod:

Did you count my gummy bear at ABR in your foodcount?

[Gorrad]

Who have you used this ability on and why?

[Gorrad]

Ok, I'm back from my vacation and ready to catch scum again. Just from reading over the last few days, I've got a few comments to make.

1. Totally agree with Yama on a few points. First, personal attacks are uncalled for in any scum scenario. Keep it logical, people. Also, while I think 100 peas was a bit of an overreaction, ABR does seem to be lurking. ABR, can you give your opinion of recent going-ons?

2. Flame, I think you're being WAY too hard on Korlash. Seriously, can you just spell out what you meant earlier? It'd be a lot more helpful than insults.

3. I'd rather not off a claimed cop tonight. Despite the fact that insanity and scum are likely among them, I'd rather wait a day or so before testing those waters. That being said, I think a ckillor lynch is just fine. I do NOT like that claim. The two people I could see as children in the administration mafia would be safety patrollers and student council members. As I have already stated that I think there's a mixed bag of students and adults in each mafia, I have a big

FoS: ckillor

That's all for now.

[Gorrad]

Oh yes. That's already been proved with TSS, if you'll recall.

[Gorrad]

I honestly have no clue about a ratio. I figure as both Admins and Soup Scum are professions, there will be a tendancy towards adults being scum, but we shouldn't let that be too strong of a tell. Here, role (flavor and mechanics) will be much more of a tell than age in my opinion.

[Gorrad]

I don't think they're at war with each other specifically, they just both want to be at the top, so they're both at war with the students. As for Death Note, if both of y'all send me a PM, I'll add y'all as /in. It won't be for a bit though, I've got to mod an open game first and that could be a few months.

[Gorrad]

Wow, glad people are into Deathnote here. ABR, vollkan, just send me a PM. I'll completely forget if you don't.

[Gorrad]

I'm waiting until the last day for my food. If CKillor still has no response, or a bad one, he gets it all. If was just stalling, I'll probably count it as a bad response. I'm not ruling out that he has a legitimate reason for not posting, though, so if he has one, I'd rather my food go elsewhere.

[Gorrad]

We're waiting soley on Hasdgfas

[Gorrad]

I'm not willing to believe that DGB would allow the game to be so easily broken. Moreover, I think Hasd's claim of RBing Yama is crap. Vollkan is right, ckillor wouldn't RB someone he had no reason to.

Stuff all remaining food in Hasdgfas' left ear

[Gorrad]

So now if Hasd is scum, Gorg is cleared?

Here's an idea - how about we lynch the people being scummy.

QFT

[Gorrad]

Or, y'know, it could end up being coincidence.

[Gorrad]

You said that it is coincidence that you and Lowell are next to each other, rather than that it would be coincidence. This implies that you're admitting to being scum.

[Gorrad]

Very fun game, DGB! Bah, go town!

[Gorrad]

And I'm dead...AGAIN! Bah, /in to replace

[Gorrad]

Yo. This is Gorrad's alt.

[Gorrad]

Finally, you're saying that there are scumbuddies left. Four people are left alive. If ANY group had more than one, we'd have lost. Or do you have an explanation for that too?

It is my understanding one scum group can't win if another oen exists. Is that not true?

Iunno, I thought it was majority

[Gorrad]

Two things

One: Win Condition and Allignment are not synonymous

Two: You forgot your 'PR' in that last post, Mneme

[Gorrad]

Man, three shots to win and I still lost. But didn't I say BM-scum from the start? Can we see Role PMs please?

[Gorrad]

My last incarnation was NK immune. What I don't get is why it wasn't a tie at the end. Was there a pre-set rule that Soup loses when all students are killed? If so, why wasn't the librarian subject to that same rule?

[Gorrad]

Soup already had a failure against BM