Food Fight Mafia - WHO OWNS THE SCHOOL???

[skitzer]

No. And BTW, were not townies. I was just saying that one of you could be. You just seem to be arguing voraciously at the moment.

[Blight]

Vote: Jordan

I don't like how a wagon was already started on Lurker so early in the game, especially since these "votes" can't be taken back...and, at the time, we didn't know how much votes someone can take before they have to go home. Actually, we still don't know this.

[JordanA24]

Vote: Jordan

I don't like how a wagon was already started on Lurker so early in the game, especially since these "votes" can't be taken back...and, at the time, we didn't know how much votes someone can take before they have to go home. Actually, we still don't know this.

String Cheese is my smallest item, I highly doubted it would do much damage (and it didn't), so it was more like a random vote, or a random bandwagon. So, voting someone solely based on putting the second vote on a "bandwagon" that was highly unlikely to result in anything near a lynch is pretty weak.

[Tarhalindur]

wait, since unofficial votes aren't real, can we cast TWO?

If so,

Unofficial Vote: Battle Mage and Gorrad

. Both you are very against each other, so I only think one is the scum. I won't throw anything yet, because it may be a waste.

That's how it worked in Kingmaker... but then again, from what I saw, Kingmaker suspicion lists got very confusing very quickly.

Meh. I'll count them for now.

Unofficial Vote Count:

Pickemgenius (1) - Tarhalindur
Gorrad (3) - Battle Mage, VitaminR, skitzer
Battle Mage (1) - Gorrad, skitzer
waar (3) - JordanA24, pickemgenius
JordanA24 (1) - Blight

[Yamahako]

wait, since unofficial votes aren't real, can we cast TWO?

If so,

Unofficial Vote: Battle Mage and Gorrad

. Both you are very against each other, so I only think one is the scum. I won't throw anything yet, because it may be a waste.

Force Peas in Skitzers eyes

[Blight]

Vote: Jordan

I don't like how a wagon was already started on Lurker so early in the game, especially since these "votes" can't be taken back...and, at the time, we didn't know how much votes someone can take before they have to go home. Actually, we still don't know this.

String Cheese is my smallest item, I highly doubted it would do much damage (and it didn't), so it was more like a random vote, or a random bandwagon. So, voting someone solely based on putting the second vote on a "bandwagon" that was highly unlikely to result in anything near a lynch is pretty weak.

You were the third, and a baby carrot + chocolate chip cookie + string cheese was enough to get Lurker up as high as he is.

And, no, I don't think all three food were enough to get a lynch, but the fact that we can't withdraw the food and we don't know how much it takes for someone to be eliminated (especially at that early stage when we weren't shown the graph) makes it a bad choice.

[JordanA24]

Vote: Jordan

I don't like how a wagon was already started on Lurker so early in the game, especially since these "votes" can't be taken back...and, at the time, we didn't know how much votes someone can take before they have to go home. Actually, we still don't know this.

String Cheese is my smallest item, I highly doubted it would do much damage (and it didn't), so it was more like a random vote, or a random bandwagon. So, voting someone solely based on putting the second vote on a "bandwagon" that was highly unlikely to result in anything near a lynch is pretty weak.

You were the third, and a baby carrot + chocolate chip cookie + string cheese was enough to get Lurker up as high as he is.

And, no, I don't think all three food were enough to get a lynch, but the fact that we can't withdraw the food and we don't know how much it takes for someone to be eliminated (especially at that early stage when we weren't shown the graph) makes it a bad choice.

No, I was second after ckillor, waar was just after me with his cookie.

I think you are overreacting somewhat to what is just a small early game bandwagon. That's all it was. Just 3 items is probably enough to get someone to about 15-20 at most, which is hardly lynch territory, it's nowhere near.

Vote: Blight, Vote: SL

[DrippingGoofball]

[Aimee]

Both you are very against each other, so I only think one is the scum.

Obviously, this is an exaggerated oversimplification.

[Tarhalindur]

Guys, stop throwing food NOW.

In case you hadn't noticed (I hadn't until just now), DGB's comments in the signup threads make it pretty clear that this game has a permavote mechanic. Unless I am very much mistaken, not only can we not take back thrown food,

thrown food is not removed at night

. In other words, Skruffs will have at least 10% damage on him FOR THE REST OF THE GAME.

The next person to disregard this warning is helping the scum and needs to die. Understood?

[Yamahako]

Both you are very against each other, so I only think one is the scum.

Obviously, this is an exaggerated oversimplification.

Is this condemnation or a defense?

flings peas at Aimee

[Yamahako]

Guys, stop throwing food NOW.

In case you hadn't noticed (I hadn't until just now), DGB's comments in the signup threads make it pretty clear that this game has a permavote mechanic. Unless I am very much mistaken, not only can we not take back thrown food,

thrown food is not removed at night

. In other words, Skruffs will have at least 10% damage on him FOR THE REST OF THE GAME.

The next person to disregard this warning is helping the scum and needs to die. Understood?

I think this goes against the spirit of the game, and I refuse to go along with it. Any attempt to "lead" the town toward lynches in this manner seems scummy to me.

Flick Peas at Tarhalindur

.

Its the same as taking notes and noticing the scummy things people say and keeping a count of how scummy you think someone is. You've got your mini-foods to show FoS's, and for full on Votes you've got your big food. If someone is tossing their big food around, mayhaps they would be suspicious - but it would take 100 (I'm guessing) small foods to lynch someone. 100 FOS's is a lot.

[DrippingGoofball]

Note on the rules:

You guys take showers every night. Therefore, the next day, you show up to the caf squeaky clean, your shirts tucked and your hems straight.

You can't take away the food you've throw during any given day, but every day begins with a clean slate.

[JDodge]

The next person who throws food without a reason gets a soda bottle to the head. I'm not kidding.

[foolinc]

Guys, stop throwing food NOW.

In case you hadn't noticed (I hadn't until just now), DGB's comments in the signup threads make it pretty clear that this game has a permavote mechanic. Unless I am very much mistaken, not only can we not take back thrown food,

thrown food is not removed at night

. In other words, Skruffs will have at least 10% damage on him FOR THE REST OF THE GAME.

The next person to disregard this warning is helping the scum and needs to die. Understood?

It doesn't work like that, but we are far enough in the game to stop randomly throwing food.

[foolinc]

The next person who throws food without a reason gets a soda bottle to the head. I'm not kidding.

I got a taco ready to lunch. Make my day por favor.

[foolinc]

>_< launch not lunch. El d'oh!

[ShadowLurker]

Looks like we have 40%-50% of damage out.

It requires 100% to lynch someone.

If 100% is half, we already must get 3/4th of the remaining items to agree.

Am I still overreacting? It seems more likely that Yamahako and JordanA24 don't want us to lynch someone today.

[JordanA24]

JordanA24 don't want us to lynch someone today.

What on Earth gave you this impression?

[foolinc]

Looks like we have 40%-50% of damage out.

It requires 100% to lynch someone.

If 100% is half, we already must get 3/4th of the remaining items to agree.

Am I still overreacting? It seems more likely that Yamahako and JordanA24 don't want us to lynch someone today.

I'm pretty sure that 100% isn't half of all the food in this game. Since votes can't be taken back and the fact each food item hits people differently, I can't see this being the case.

That said, I am still in the agreement that saving our food right now is the correct move (no matter how I want to just randomly throw food in satify the flavor of the game).

[Gorrad]

Mod: Skitzer is hit a few posts before the count, but he shows up as clean on the list. Did the food not effect him, or was that thrown while the list was being compiled?

[Nightfall]

VOTE: Yamahako

[Gorrad]

VOTE: Yamahako

Any reason?

[Blight]

You guys take showers every night. Therefore, the next day, you show up to the caf squeaky clean, your shirts tucked and your hems straight.

Maybe

you

take a shower every night.

Vote: Jordan

I don't like how a wagon was already started on Lurker so early in the game, especially since these "votes" can't be taken back...and, at the time, we didn't know how much votes someone can take before they have to go home. Actually, we still don't know this.

String Cheese is my smallest item, I highly doubted it would do much damage (and it didn't), so it was more like a random vote, or a random bandwagon. So, voting someone solely based on putting the second vote on a "bandwagon" that was highly unlikely to result in anything near a lynch is pretty weak.

You were the third, and a baby carrot + chocolate chip cookie + string cheese was enough to get Lurker up as high as he is.

And, no, I don't think all three food were enough to get a lynch, but the fact that we can't withdraw the food and we don't know how much it takes for someone to be eliminated (especially at that early stage when we weren't shown the graph) makes it a bad choice.

No, I was second after ckillor, waar was just after me with his cookie.

I think you are overreacting somewhat to what is just a small early game bandwagon. That's all it was. Just 3 items is probably enough to get someone to about 15-20 at most, which is hardly lynch territory, it's nowhere near.

Vote: Blight, Vote: SL

You were third. Your first attempt didn't count.

Also, considering we can't take back our thrown food, ganging up on someone is a lot more dangerous than you're making it out to be. Add to that the fact that we don't know where lynch territory is. It could be when someone reaches 20, 30, 50, 70...we don't know, and we had even less of an idea before the graph was given.

It might be a bit of an overreaction, but, so far, I like my vote best on you.

[the silent speaker]

I don't think I've posted yet. That's because I don't want to use up my food before I have a good sense of where I want it to stay thrown, but I am here and reading.