Mini 497 - Game Over


User avatar
Atticus
Atticus
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Atticus
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1720
Joined: January 8, 2006
Location: MO, USA

Post Post #450 (ISO) » Sun Oct 21, 2007 8:04 am

Post by Atticus »

Not when I was typing that. But he's not.
"There is nothing more exhilarating than to be shot at without result." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
joost
joost
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
joost
Goon
Goon
Posts: 254
Joined: August 12, 2007
Location: Holland

Post Post #451 (ISO) » Sun Oct 21, 2007 10:06 am

Post by joost »

Actually he is. Why do you think he isn't?
[i]You're[/i] a towel!

"We must hang together, gentlemen...else, we shall most assuredly hang separately." - Benjamin Franklin
User avatar
Atticus
Atticus
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Atticus
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1720
Joined: January 8, 2006
Location: MO, USA

Post Post #452 (ISO) » Sun Oct 21, 2007 12:56 pm

Post by Atticus »

Because vampyrus has never voted.
"There is nothing more exhilarating than to be shot at without result." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
curiouskarmadog
curiouskarmadog
This Space for Rant
User avatar
User avatar
curiouskarmadog
This Space for Rant
This Space for Rant
Posts: 14229
Joined: June 17, 2007
Location: Roanoke, Va

Post Post #453 (ISO) » Mon Oct 22, 2007 3:06 am

Post by curiouskarmadog »

you need to follow the game a little better.

vamp and tin never unvoted when I replaced.
JDodge wrote:
Vote Count
:

curiouskarmadog (5): vampyrusddg, -TinVision-, Sephiroth, joost, kabenon007
-TinVision- (2): destructor, OpposedForce
kabenon007 (1): Shanba
Sephiroth (1): curiouskarmadog
Atticus (1): Aimee
vampyrusddg (1): Atticus

not voting (1): Flameaxe

Seven to lynch.

Current Player List
:

Atticus
curiouskarmadog
(replaces dusterhan)

-TinVision-
destructor
joost
OpposedForce
(replaces Knuck)

kabenon007
Shanba
(replaces Nirp)

Sephiroth
Aimee
Flameaxe
(replaces SilverPhoenix)

vampyrusddg
(replaces Nekka-Lucifer)
NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE
User avatar
joost
joost
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
joost
Goon
Goon
Posts: 254
Joined: August 12, 2007
Location: Holland

Post Post #454 (ISO) » Mon Oct 22, 2007 3:19 am

Post by joost »

vampyrusddg wrote:How would his vote be OMGUS when he's presenting a case against you? OMGUS refers to a knee jerk action directed back at someone who just attacked you with no case behind it.
As it is Sephiroth has presented an eloquent well thought out case against you and you started off defending yourself fairly well, but it's now obvious your scum going to pieces over 1 vote, an FOS, and an old vote left by me which if I'd realised was there would probably have removed.

But at least that saves me the trouble of moving it
Here he confirms his vote.
[i]You're[/i] a towel!

"We must hang together, gentlemen...else, we shall most assuredly hang separately." - Benjamin Franklin
User avatar
Atticus
Atticus
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Atticus
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1720
Joined: January 8, 2006
Location: MO, USA

Post Post #455 (ISO) » Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:22 am

Post by Atticus »

Ah, I was just skimming.
"There is nothing more exhilarating than to be shot at without result." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
curiouskarmadog
curiouskarmadog
This Space for Rant
User avatar
User avatar
curiouskarmadog
This Space for Rant
This Space for Rant
Posts: 14229
Joined: June 17, 2007
Location: Roanoke, Va

Post Post #456 (ISO) » Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:27 am

Post by curiouskarmadog »

and I am the guy that is close to a lynch...maybe I should have ignored this game and coast too..seems like a good tactic.
NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE
User avatar
Atticus
Atticus
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Atticus
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1720
Joined: January 8, 2006
Location: MO, USA

Post Post #457 (ISO) » Mon Oct 22, 2007 2:22 pm

Post by Atticus »

Mighta worked.
"There is nothing more exhilarating than to be shot at without result." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
destructor
destructor
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
destructor
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2017
Joined: July 3, 2007

Post Post #458 (ISO) » Tue Oct 23, 2007 2:36 am

Post by destructor »

Sorry guys, I'm really busy at the moment. I'm still very interested in this game and I'll get right into it sooner than later.

Having a quick read of the previous few posts, I think Atticus is lynch-worthy on account of him being so anti-town! He seems to have an aversion to scum-hunting to boot. :roll:
.::][:::::][:::::][:::::][::.
User avatar
curiouskarmadog
curiouskarmadog
This Space for Rant
User avatar
User avatar
curiouskarmadog
This Space for Rant
This Space for Rant
Posts: 14229
Joined: June 17, 2007
Location: Roanoke, Va

Post Post #459 (ISO) » Tue Oct 23, 2007 7:04 am

Post by curiouskarmadog »

right, but would scum act so blatantly disinterested?
NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE
User avatar
Atticus
Atticus
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Atticus
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1720
Joined: January 8, 2006
Location: MO, USA

Post Post #460 (ISO) » Tue Oct 23, 2007 3:02 pm

Post by Atticus »

Explain what makes me anti-town, destructor. After your read, that is.
"There is nothing more exhilarating than to be shot at without result." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
vampyrusddg
vampyrusddg
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
vampyrusddg
Goon
Goon
Posts: 213
Joined: February 20, 2007
Location: U.K.

Post Post #461 (ISO) » Wed Oct 24, 2007 12:10 am

Post by vampyrusddg »

Atticus wrote:Explain what makes me anti-town, destructor. After your read, that is.
I'll do it for him, you've been lurking in plain sight pretty much the whole game, by which I mean you've been actively posting, but mostly with no content or suspicions which are very shaky.
"So we're going to die then"
"Yes... Hang on a minute what's this?"
"Where"
"Only kidding, we're going to die after all..."
User avatar
Atticus
Atticus
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Atticus
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1720
Joined: January 8, 2006
Location: MO, USA

Post Post #462 (ISO) » Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:12 am

Post by Atticus »

Not necessary. Your scumbuddy is plenty good at bringing up reasons for suspecting people.
"There is nothing more exhilarating than to be shot at without result." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
Shanba
Shanba
So win
User avatar
User avatar
Shanba
So win
So win
Posts: 4072
Joined: January 3, 2007
Location: Up a Tree

Post Post #463 (ISO) » Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:22 am

Post by Shanba »

curiouskarmadog wrote:right, but would scum act so blatantly disinterested?
Yes. 100% they would.
(10:50:24 PM) xcaykex: GODDAMNIT I DONT WANNA GET RID OF MY TENTACLE RAPE PORN

Ribbit.
User avatar
-TinVision-
-TinVision-
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
-TinVision-
Goon
Goon
Posts: 426
Joined: April 24, 2007

Post Post #464 (ISO) » Wed Oct 24, 2007 5:42 am

Post by -TinVision- »

I've been without Internet for a few days, so I need to catch up. I'm second-guessing myself on curiouskarmadog, but I always do that. Sigh... rereading.
lol objective morality
User avatar
destructor
destructor
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
destructor
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2017
Joined: July 3, 2007

Post Post #465 (ISO) » Wed Oct 24, 2007 3:38 pm

Post by destructor »

Post 79.
Atticus wrote:On Random Votes:

The point of random votes is to gain early vibes and suspicions of people. To give a truly random vote, say from random.org, you can get no reaction from the votee, and thus, no vibe or suspicion. To give a reason for a random vote is fueling this activity, increasing its productivity. To truly suspect someone for a random vote, random FoS, or random vote reason, is degrading to the information process. To
react
to the such things, however, helps the town.
I was having a skim of some of the early pages and this post stuck out to me. It makes no sense. How on earth can a player of the uninformed majority ever claim to give a 'reason' to a random vote that can be considered even slightly legitimate and so 'increase its productivity'?

The sentiment behind this post resembles TinVision's reasoning back here (280):
-TinVision- wrote:Not much pressure can hope to be applied, but at the beginning of the game, you take what you can get. As to your second question, it's not necessarily better. However, it's a part of an early game strategy to maximize that pressure. People pretty much ignore the first vote completely. The second vote however, as we can see clearly in this game, can get people riled. If a scum gets a vote stuck on them early that they can't be sure is random, it may shake them and lose their composure, revealing something to the town.
HOS: Atticus

Until I finish reading, my vote on Tin stands.
.::][:::::][:::::][:::::][::.
User avatar
Shanba
Shanba
So win
User avatar
User avatar
Shanba
So win
So win
Posts: 4072
Joined: January 3, 2007
Location: Up a Tree

Post Post #466 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2007 4:13 am

Post by Shanba »

I am disappointed in the lack of kabenon votes.
(10:50:24 PM) xcaykex: GODDAMNIT I DONT WANNA GET RID OF MY TENTACLE RAPE PORN

Ribbit.
User avatar
Atticus
Atticus
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Atticus
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1720
Joined: January 8, 2006
Location: MO, USA

Post Post #467 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2007 9:21 am

Post by Atticus »

destructor wrote:Post 79.
Atticus wrote:On Random Votes:

The point of random votes is to gain early vibes and suspicions of people. To give a truly random vote, say from random.org, you can get no reaction from the votee, and thus, no vibe or suspicion. To give a reason for a random vote is fueling this activity, increasing its productivity. To truly suspect someone for a random vote, random FoS, or random vote reason, is degrading to the information process. To
react
to the such things, however, helps the town.
I was having a skim of some of the early pages and this post stuck out to me. It makes no sense. How on earth can a player of the uninformed majority ever claim to give a 'reason' to a random vote that can be considered even slightly legitimate and so 'increase its productivity'?

The sentiment behind this post resembles TinVision's reasoning back here (280):
-TinVision- wrote:Not much pressure can hope to be applied, but at the beginning of the game, you take what you can get. As to your second question, it's not necessarily better. However, it's a part of an early game strategy to maximize that pressure. People pretty much ignore the first vote completely. The second vote however, as we can see clearly in this game, can get people riled. If a scum gets a vote stuck on them early that they can't be sure is random, it may shake them and lose their composure, revealing something to the town.
HOS: Atticus

Until I finish reading, my vote on Tin stands.
So you think that because I, in a way, try and enforce TV's ways, that I am above the finger of suspicion level?
"There is nothing more exhilarating than to be shot at without result." - Winston Churchill
User avatar
JDodge
JDodge
Accept it
User avatar
User avatar
JDodge
Accept it
Accept it
Posts: 5926
Joined: May 6, 2005
Location: Atop my cloud

Post Post #468 (ISO) » Fri Oct 26, 2007 8:33 am

Post by JDodge »

Vote Count
:

curiouskarmadog (5): vampyrusddg, -TinVision-, Sephiroth, joost, kabenon007
-TinVision- (2): destructor, OpposedForce
kabenon007 (1): Shanba
Sephiroth (1): curiouskarmadog
Atticus (1): Aimee
vampyrusddg (1): Atticus

not voting (1): Flameaxe

Seven to lynch.

Current Player List
:

Atticus
curiouskarmadog
(replaces dusterhan)

-TinVision-
destructor
joost
OpposedForce
(replaces Knuck)

kabenon007
Shanba
(replaces Nirp)

Sephiroth
Aimee
Flameaxe
(replaces SilverPhoenix)

vampyrusddg
(replaces Nekka-Lucifer)


Prodding kabenon, Sephiroth, Aimee and Flameaxe.

In addition I am going to set a
deadline
for 3:30 PM EDT, November 9th.
User avatar
kabenon007
kabenon007
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
kabenon007
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1186
Joined: April 19, 2007
Location: Cannot be disclosed, as it would jeapordize my mission

Post Post #469 (ISO) » Fri Oct 26, 2007 10:37 am

Post by kabenon007 »

Hey, sorry about my absence. I really have no excuse, I just forgot to check on this one. Um... my vote on CKD still stands, he hasn't defended himself well enough IMO.
I put the "laughter" in manslaughter.
User avatar
curiouskarmadog
curiouskarmadog
This Space for Rant
User avatar
User avatar
curiouskarmadog
This Space for Rant
This Space for Rant
Posts: 14229
Joined: June 17, 2007
Location: Roanoke, Va

Post Post #470 (ISO) » Fri Oct 26, 2007 5:12 pm

Post by curiouskarmadog »

kabenon007 wrote:Hey, sorry about my absence. I really have no excuse, I just forgot to check on this one. Um... my vote on CKD still stands, he hasn't defended himself well enough IMO.
lol, have you presented a case?

look I am just a vanilla townie..so I would rather you lynch me than a power role..that being said, I would rather you lynch scum instead of me...but do what you got to do...maybe if I am dead you might look at Seph and joost a little more closely...
NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE
User avatar
vampyrusddg
vampyrusddg
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
vampyrusddg
Goon
Goon
Posts: 213
Joined: February 20, 2007
Location: U.K.

Post Post #471 (ISO) » Fri Oct 26, 2007 6:02 pm

Post by vampyrusddg »

curiouskarmadog wrote:maybe if I am dead you might look at Seph and joost a little more closely...
no offense CKD, but if we did lynch you and it proved your VT claim then why would we be any more inclined to believe you? It would just prove that you knew as little as every other VT/non-investigative town role in this game. All it would prove is that there was no mallicious intent behind your accusations
"So we're going to die then"
"Yes... Hang on a minute what's this?"
"Where"
"Only kidding, we're going to die after all..."
User avatar
joost
joost
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
joost
Goon
Goon
Posts: 254
Joined: August 12, 2007
Location: Holland

Post Post #472 (ISO) » Fri Oct 26, 2007 6:19 pm

Post by joost »

I'll be away till Wednesday.

I'll keep my vote on CKD.
[i]You're[/i] a towel!

"We must hang together, gentlemen...else, we shall most assuredly hang separately." - Benjamin Franklin
User avatar
curiouskarmadog
curiouskarmadog
This Space for Rant
User avatar
User avatar
curiouskarmadog
This Space for Rant
This Space for Rant
Posts: 14229
Joined: June 17, 2007
Location: Roanoke, Va

Post Post #473 (ISO) » Sat Oct 27, 2007 2:04 am

Post by curiouskarmadog »

vampyrusddg wrote:
curiouskarmadog wrote:maybe if I am dead you might look at Seph and joost a little more closely...
no offense CKD, but if we did lynch you and it proved your VT claim then why would we be any more inclined to believe you? It would just prove that you knew as little as every other VT/non-investigative town role in this game. All it would prove is that there was no mallicious intent behind your accusations
have you seriously looked at joost and Seph? IF so, what do you think my case is against them?
NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE
User avatar
curiouskarmadog
curiouskarmadog
This Space for Rant
User avatar
User avatar
curiouskarmadog
This Space for Rant
This Space for Rant
Posts: 14229
Joined: June 17, 2007
Location: Roanoke, Va

Post Post #474 (ISO) » Sat Oct 27, 2007 2:05 am

Post by curiouskarmadog »

joost wrote:I'll be away till Wednesday.

I'll keep my vote on CKD.
of course you will, myabe if you get lucky, I get hung
NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE

Return to “Completed Mini Normal Games”