Well, you're cool, so Nero eventually decided he wanted you to win too.In post 8541, dramonic wrote:I dunno why I won, but yay?
Seriously though, you've got Rach to thank for that.
Well, you're cool, so Nero eventually decided he wanted you to win too.In post 8541, dramonic wrote:I dunno why I won, but yay?
You did well, but outing your entire PT was a bad move. Still, catching SS was kind of a compensation for it, so you can say you still deserved to win at the end.In post 8542, Luna Fox wrote:Kinda funny now that i think about it:Also my 4th post in undead thread:In post 103, Luna Fox wrote:I think that Tim's scum, and BBMolla's town.
Which bring back the eternal debate between "town have no reason to lie" vs "town are prone to tell lies as much as scum are, bc this is a game of LIES AND DECEIT". The only difference is what lies are you telling and to what purpose.In post 8543, ActionDan wrote:BBM was lying though.
Actually that was a good vig, and a well-timed one too. Emotions aside, it would have been MUCH harder for us to ratify the treaty with Expedience alive.In post 8544, RachMarie wrote: NERO YOU SHOULD NOT HAVE KILLED MY GF GRRRRRR
Not exactly. What I thought was we needed to kill scum (and at the time I considered non-human = scum), and IF THE GAME DIDN'T END by then, then maybe the champions needed to settle it between themselves as they would be considered "threats" to eachother, but not to other humans.In post 8589, Nero Cain wrote:I swore Mastin said in the dead thread you thought you needed to kill me.In post 8579, Almost50 wrote:bc I didn't want to kill the other Champions either.
also sorry Titus
I was playing the game solo since day 1. its really brutal to talk about me like that , yes my teammates all deserved to loose for lurking.In post 8608, Cerberus v666 wrote:Cult deserved to lose because lurksacks shouldn't win, so Nosferatu REALLY deserved to lose, and they screwed up their defense against the guilty that existed on them from D3, AND for recruiting/killing the wrong people, AND for ASOIAF's ridiculous "this claim is clearly designed to counteract any potential guilties against my slot" claim
In post 417, Cerberus v666 wrote:Word. Now everyone is mainly having trouble solidly putting things together to understand what actually occurred.In post 416, Nahdia wrote:the people parsing all the flood of information we got all died last night lmao.
I mean, I'm not being too harsh on them, right? I do have insider information etc, but I THINK from the information they have they should be able to put all the pieces together.'
Bacde watched Luna
Toogeloo BG'd luna.
Bacde saw Nosferatu and himself visit Luna, and did not see Toogeloo.
Luna died.
Nosferatu claims he visited Stormblade with his role.
Stormblade died.
Luna dying through protection means: Toogeloo is lying scum, was redirected, or was roleblocked. The first two are unlikely because luna was a high priority watcher target, and toogeloo was a low priority redirect target.
Bacde not seeing Toogeloo means: Toogeloo is lying scum, was redirected, was roleblocked, or Bacde himself was redirected. We already established the first two as unlikely, so Toogeloo was roleblocked, or Bacde was redirected.
No reason to assume two redirectors. Most likely that one of Bacde or Nosferatu was redirected.
If Bacde was redirected, and Nosferatu was not, he saw Nosferatu alone visit a corpse. Nosferatu guilty.
If Nosferatu was redirected, and Bacde was not, he saw Nosferatu alone visit a corpse. Nosferatu guilty.
These hold true regardless of whether Toogeloo was roleblocked or not, but not seeing toogeloo makes it more likely that Bacde was redirected than Nosferatu.
That's where they should be at, right? I'm not using any information they're not privy to. They're just not seeing it.
actually 2 of you would live. but neither would have a vestIn post 8592, Almost50 wrote:What if -on N1- NR visited Titus (and they did), and I decided to pay NR a visit myself, and then some scum faction decided to call my bluff and shoot me?? Do you think the town would have still had any realistic chance to win if all 3 Champs got killed on N1??
Good question.In post 8619, Frozen Angel wrote:what was a better claim for me then cerb?
I was basically a mod confirmed cult at that point
Rb claimed miller. Definite mistake that. I can guarantee it would not have mattered. Same difference with shooting Rach vs Wake. I maintain that not being a mistake at the time anyway.In [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=8303486#p8303486]post 8609[/url], Cerberus v666 wrote:Wulden deserved to lose because Tim hung himself with miller claim or whatever, and for not killing rach over wake