STEVEN UNIVERSE 2 - GAME OVER

Shiro · Post Post #6575 (ISO) » Sat Oct 01, 2016 7:34 am

Farside, me and Titus should Def ally. How many people can be in an finale alliance?

Titus · Post Post #6576 (ISO) » Sat Oct 01, 2016 7:36 am

@RR, You said I am good at Suikodening things. I am NOT worried about the lack of voters at the moment.

@Shiro, I am not wanting to discuss our third ally until beach claims.

Almost50 · Post Post #6577 (ISO) » Sat Oct 01, 2016 7:40 am

Catching up, but have this "naive" question regarding the Finale allying process:

Do we have confirmation it would be a 3-way PT or could it be TWO separate PTs?

In other words.. if I submit X & Y, does X also have to ally with Y? Because I was thinking maybe:

A allies with B & C

B allies with A & D

C allies with A & D

as a simple example of making it a 4-way exchange of info. We could even expand on that to get it to 6 or 7 players passing the info to eachother (but that will be quite hard to agree on considering nobody trusts others reads, so whom I think is town you might not and if you did the 3rd person might not and so on).

Titus · Post Post #6578 (ISO) » Sat Oct 01, 2016 7:42 am

Finales are large hoods.

Reasonably Rational · Post Post #6579 (ISO) » Sat Oct 01, 2016 7:43 am

In the first SU game, the larger finale alliances were all in one PT.

~Drixx

P.S. - Titus: please consider what I said about your advice to me on leading town. You're IC now so we're going to slipstream with you. We know some things you really need to know. Unless you have some really compelling need to ally elsewhere, keep that in mind. Who has the popcorn atm?

farside22 · Post Post #6580 (ISO) » Sat Oct 01, 2016 7:45 am

Let me get this straight, you wanted me to claim a negative utility role and hope when I say hey you target me and I'll get bonus even though it's negative and know in my heart of hearts no one would target me.
Sadly the only reason Titus knows she was blocked by me was because she targetted me.
A noisy ascetic for scum is awful.
But hey who cares, right Titus.

Awwww Shiro are you buddying me? If you haven't noticed I'm not a buddying type.

Titus · Post Post #6581 (ISO) » Sat Oct 01, 2016 7:46 am

@Drixx, Understood.

Do you mind allying with Shiro?

Reasonably Rational · Post Post #6582 (ISO) » Sat Oct 01, 2016 7:48 am

In post 6581, Titus wrote:@Drixx, Understood.

Do you mind allying with Shiro?

I'll go through the ISO and make sure there's nothing inconsistent or fake. I have no gut objections.

~Drixx

Titus · Post Post #6583 (ISO) » Sat Oct 01, 2016 7:49 am

Dgb has popcorn.

Yume · Post Post #6584 (ISO) » Sat Oct 01, 2016 7:52 am

I am gonna ally with Magna and someone else if Magna says yes.

farside22 · Post Post #6585 (ISO) » Sat Oct 01, 2016 7:56 am

In post 6480, farside22 wrote:Please state whom you picked for beach prize at the start of day 3 in order given.

kraskaesque - claimed
SnarkySnowman - claimed
DrippingGoofball
randomidget
Not Chara
Shadow_step
Reasonably Rational - claimed
Shiro - claimed
Xkfyu
farside22 - claimed
TheFuzzylogic
TheWayItEnds
Skybird
MagnaofIllusion
Creature - claimed
Firebringer - claimed
Almost50
grapes
McMenno
Yume
mastina
Titus

Yume · Post Post #6586 (ISO) » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:05 am

@RR No, not doing it.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #6587 (ISO) » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:19 am

In post 6583, Titus wrote:Dgb has popcorn.

Ascetic

I control my ally's vote for the day which sucks balls I'd rather not

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #6588 (ISO) » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:19 am

I'll popcorn MoI

Titus · Post Post #6589 (ISO) » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:21 am

Dgb we're popcorning who we voted in the event.

Who is your ally?

Titus · Post Post #6590 (ISO) » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:21 am

But it's more like a popcorn down a fixed order.

Reasonably Rational · Post Post #6591 (ISO) » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:22 am

In post 6586, Yume wrote:@RR No, not doing it.

I understand the hesitation but I don't see the long term upside. Better to get it over with, imo. It's your call but just consider what happens going into the future one way and the other. I think you'll agree it's best just to get it done with.

In post 6587, DrippingGoofball wrote:
In post 6583, Titus wrote:Dgb has popcorn.
Ascetic

I control my ally's vote for the day which sucks balls I'd rather not

Ummm... okay. It was obvious you were a vote stealer since day one. Did you really misunderstand what you were being asked to claim?

~Drixx

MagnaofIllusion · Post Post #6592 (ISO) » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:22 am

In post 6580, farside22 wrote:Let me get this straight, you wanted me to claim a negative utility role and hope when I say hey you target me and I'll get bonus even though it's negative and know in my heart of hearts no one would target me.
Sadly the only reason Titus knows she was blocked by me was because she targetted me.
A noisy ascetic for scum is awful.
But hey who cares, right Titus.

This is so awful that I can't begin to think Farside is Town spouting this drivel. I mean peddling that it is Pro-Town to hide an Ascetic role with the intent purpose of negating the use probably multiple Town roles simply to boost a single role (her own)? Not smart in the least.

And then the WIFOM "Oh, my role would be terrible for scum" and the whole earlier junk level AtE (How many Town must we lynch when we've had exactly 2 lynches and only 1 mislynch) and you get a recipie for scum.

I'll vote her the minute I have the OK.

In post 6584, Yume wrote:I am gonna ally with Magna and someone else if Magna says yes.

Absolutely. Anyone else you have in mind?

MagnaofIllusion · Post Post #6593 (ISO) » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:23 am

In post 6587, DrippingGoofball wrote:
In post 6583, Titus wrote:Dgb has popcorn.
Ascetic

I control my ally's vote for the day which sucks balls I'd rather not

Oh look another Ascetic claim ...

MagnaofIllusion · Post Post #6594 (ISO) » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:24 am

In post 6591, Reasonably Rational wrote:I understand the hesitation but I don't see the long term upside. Better to get it over with, imo. It's your call but just consider what happens going into the future one way and the other. I think you'll agree it's best just to get it done with.

If she says no stop badgering her on it.

Titus · Post Post #6595 (ISO) » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:24 am

@RR, I concur.

@MoI, You have the ok. We just are not lynching ANYONE until the beach claims resolve, no matter how right I am convinced I am. We need to do the math.

Creature · Post Post #6596 (ISO) » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:26 am

Oh wait, it's a popcorn.

MagnaofIllusion · Post Post #6597 (ISO) » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:26 am

In post 6595, Titus wrote:@MoI, You have the ok. We just are not lynching ANYONE until the beach claims resolve, no matter how right I am convinced I am. We need to do the math.

Ok sounds good.

VOTE: Farside

Yume · Post Post #6598 (ISO) » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:27 am

@RR I am not having

them

find that thing out.

@Magna Maybe Almost50? Or Skybird?

Reasonably Rational · Post Post #6599 (ISO) » Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:28 am

In post 6594, MagnaofIllusion wrote:
In post 6591, Reasonably Rational wrote:I understand the hesitation but I don't see the long term upside. Better to get it over with, imo. It's your call but just consider what happens going into the future one way and the other. I think you'll agree it's best just to get it done with.
If she says no stop badgering her on it.

Politely see your way out of the conversation. I'm fairly certain you don't know what we're talking about and thus have no reason to interject.

~Drixx

P-Edit: Okay. I think it's inevitable but your call on the timing I guess.