Mafia 73: NEGWLTWWWTKY - Abandoned!

[schismatized]

vote peers

again. This post irks me:

Vote: JordanA24

Reason: He's had four posts so far, two of them were votes with no other content. He has not explained his reasons for his current vote, which started a bandwagon on that player, and has tried to spin an apology the person he voted for made as 'backtracking', which feels like trying to retroactively justify his vote.

My other two of the 'requested list'...

Panzerjager, for the following, which feels like he's bandwagoning for the sake of bandwagoning, or trying to convince those who're voting otherwise to pick one of us:

So, are we lynching hasd or peers?

And #2, Sikario, which is more due to all the arguing about him than anything else giving much more to think about. I've seen plenty of town mislynches, especially day one, and they all seem to follow the same patterns as today, but I haven't played with a lot of this game before -- they could work differently as a town and be seeing something I don't.

First of all, if you haven't noticed, I have been acting the same way as panzerjager the whole game. Why no vote for me? A little hypocritical.

Second, I have never really agreed with voting someone for lurking. Always ask for a mod prod/replace.

[Mastermind of Sin]

Unvote, Vote: Toaster Strudel

Metagame policy to lynch TS in every game until I see some useful posts instead of random ranting that doesn't even contain logic.

[Toaster Strudel]

Unvote, Vote: Toaster Strudel

Metagame policy to lynch TS in every game until I see some useful posts instead of random ranting that doesn't even contain logic.

Any player that reads the above post ought to selectively read MoS's posts in this game, and compare to mine.

I guarantee you're going to laugh.

Just to make it easier, let me post the ENTIRETY of MoS's contribution to this game (7 tiny, meaningless posts):

Original Roll String: 1d19 (STATIC)

1 19-Sided Dice: (8) = 8

Vote: Zu_Faul

Your expecting me to react to a vote in the random voting stage?

You just did.

Congrats schizy =P

Kaleidopoop?

Hi.

Unvote, Vote: Toaster Strudel

Metagame policy to lynch TS in every game until I see some useful posts instead of random ranting that doesn't even contain logic.

MoS's lack of reading the game (if he read the game he would not have dismissed my contribution so lackadaisically), combined with his own near complete lack of participation, and sudden attempt to distract from the Peers wagon leads me to believe that we might be on to something with the Peers wagon.

Also, my theory that either Jordan or Panzer may be scum with Peers, *might* be correct - and *if* it is correct, there is a strong probability that MoS would be another buddy.

[Albert B. Rampage]

LOL

you rock TS ^5

[PJ.]

If peers wasn't scum I'd switch my vote.

[Peers]

Peers isn't scum. Peers is very much not scum.

[zu_Faul]

^wrong

vote: peers

[Mastermind of Sin]

Unvote, Vote: Toaster Strudel

Metagame policy to lynch TS in every game until I see some useful posts instead of random ranting that doesn't even contain logic.

Any player that reads the above post ought to selectively read MoS's posts in this game, and compare to mine.

I guarantee you're going to laugh.

Just to make it easier, let me post the ENTIRETY of MoS's contribution to this game (7 tiny, meaningless posts):

Original Roll String: 1d19 (STATIC)

1 19-Sided Dice: (8) = 8

Vote: Zu_Faul

Your expecting me to react to a vote in the random voting stage?

You just did.

Congrats schizy =P

Kaleidopoop?

Hi.

Unvote, Vote: Toaster Strudel

Metagame policy to lynch TS in every game until I see some useful posts instead of random ranting that doesn't even contain logic.

MoS's lack of reading the game (if he read the game he would not have dismissed my contribution so lackadaisically), combined with his own near complete lack of participation, and sudden attempt to distract from the Peers wagon leads me to believe that we might be on to something with the Peers wagon.

Also, my theory that either Jordan or Panzer may be scum with Peers, *might* be correct - and *if* it is correct, there is a strong probability that MoS would be another buddy.

Let this post serve as case in point for my meta-vote. I will continue to policy lynch someone who comes up with such ridiculous conspiracy theories left and right. We're only on page 10, for fuck's sake. There's nothing overly important going on. I don't even know what the peers wagon is about.

[schismatized]

MoS chill out.

[Toaster Strudel]

Just to offer one more conspiracy theory and some meta-gaming...

MoS might be really angry that I cracked his whole scum team so early in the game!

And really angry that Peers screwed up, maybe, too! Maybe Peers really did give out his scumbuddy Jordan/Panzer on a silver platter It's not impossible you know. It won't be the first time I've seen scum caught early.

Any reasonable player will wonder the

real reason

why MoS has kept so uncharacteristically silent in this game (that's the meta-gaming bit), and is now so-oo-oo-o-o cross. And why so cross with me, when there are plenty of other players that have contributed little, like, say, himself? Why me? Let every player answer this question for himself, and come to their own conclusion.

(Peers / MoS) or (Jordan / Panzer) = good lynches for today.

[Albert B. Rampage]

TS you are getting carried away. Peers is scum with BM.

[Albert B. Rampage]

Can we vig MoS tonight ?

[Quagmire]

Just to offer one more conspiracy theory and some meta-gaming...

MoS might be really angry that I cracked his whole scum team so early in the game!

And really angry that Peers screwed up, maybe, too! Maybe Peers really did give out his scumbuddy Jordan/Panzer on a silver platter It's not impossible you know. It won't be the first time I've seen scum caught early.

Any reasonable player will wonder the

real reason

why MoS has kept so uncharacteristically silent in this game (that's the meta-gaming bit), and is now so-oo-oo-o-o cross. And why so cross with me, when there are plenty of other players that have contributed little, like, say, himself? Why me? Let every player answer this question for himself, and come to their own conclusion.

(Peers / MoS) or (Jordan / Panzer) = good lynches for today.

MoS is absolutely right.

unvote, vote toaster strudel

[Battle Mage]

policy lynches are ridiculously dumb. MoS knows this really.

[Toaster Strudel]

Peers isn't scum. Peers is very much not scum.

You're at lynch -3.

[Toaster Strudel]

MoS is absolutely right.

My, the cattle is practically herding itself to the slaughterhouse! Don't miss tomorrow's BBQ, we're serving juicy Vig Meat burgers.

[Toaster Strudel]

Peers isn't scum. Peers is very much not scum.

You're at lynch -3.

EBWOP: That would be -2, I missed schiz's vote at the top of the page.

[JordanA24]

I am here, and still very happy with my Peers vote, he's not providing good defenses, he's still buddying up, and voting lurkers is never a great thing to do.

I agree with TS that if Peers turns up scum, Panzer is a very good person to go after.

I am also wary of MoS's Post 232, that was way too overdefensive for my liking.

[Albert B. Rampage]

Unvote Sikario, vote Peers

Time to claim Peers.

[Peers]

Okay, you got me. It's time for me to claim... and I'm a vanilla townie. Whoo-hoo, the secret is out...

[Battle Mage]

got any flavour with that?

[Albert B. Rampage]

What's your flavor Peers ?

[Battle Mage]

What's your flavor Peers ?

dude, stop stalking me.

[Albert B. Rampage]

Why did you ask that, anyway ?

[Battle Mage]

Why did you ask that, anyway ?

You dont understand why i asked it, and yet you asked it yourself?

Unvote, Vote: ABR