Well I don't. I know your character. I know what your event is. I know that you have a killing power, which was conveyed to me as being something incredibly weak. That's it.
Sometimes scum act scummy.
Yes, sometimes.
But the vast majority of scummy actions come from town.
Scummy actions, in of themselves, cannot be read.
You need to look deeper than surface-level play and take into consideration other factors. Who the player is. (Me making a surface-level scummy play is different from Titus making a surface-level scummy play is different from Thefuzzylogic making a surface-level scummy play is different from......) What the driving motivator behind their actions was. Does it fit into a plan, or does it not?
And your failure is that you've failed to connect the dots between "this is farside's plan" and "these are farside's actions". You've done those individually. But you haven't connected them. That's what I do, because it's what I'm good at, and yet I can't figure out a connection. I can't do it on my own, and even knowing what your logic is, "these are farside's actions" to "this is farside's plan", trying to do your work for you and fill the gap, create a line between the two,
I can't
, because it doesn't exist.
The two are entirely unconnected, and that's my point. If farside were scum, then the plan would have a clear tie to the actions. Yet the disconnect between farside's actions and what you say is her plan (which doesn't even make that much sense as a plan anyway!) means I quite literally can't see her as scum.
There's no foolproof objective evidence nor is there likely to be because Varsoon despises cops and mechanical guilties and wants people to PLAY the game.
And this is a very un-RR thing to say. From either head, though I'd be instantly lynching you if that were Cerb speaking. RR specializes in turning things V has made--which he makes in an attempt to force people to play the game--into things that CAN break the game mechanically. See also, the first Steven Universe game with your game-winning plan among other spots. You know it to be true.
So tell me. Why are you insisting now that there is no objective evidence? Why are you insisting on discarding the mechanical evidence which strongly indicates that farside is town? Yes it's not evidence based off of play, but it's evidence which should be near-foolproof, requiring an incredible stretch in logic.
To say that we haven't seriously pushed Farside just tells me you haven't been reading.
No, no!
Quite the opposite.
I've said you've done
plenty
of serious pushing on farside.
I'm calling the push an absolute pile of shit.
And no ... I won't just "dealwithit" that you just compared me to Donald Trump. (For the record: I would feel the same way if you compared me to Hillary Clinton).
Not taking that back, sorry.
It means nothing about you as a person.
It means everything about your play in this game.
This is the difference between calling you stupid, and calling your actions stupid. I'm doing the latter.
...For what it's worth, though: inherent to that statement is a comparison to my own scumgame so it's explicitly me saying nothing I wouldn't also say of myself. And on that subject, I could also compare
myself
to Hillary Clinton...and I have gone on record multiple times about my belief that she's even worse than Trump is. (I'm firmly in the camp that no matter which of them wins, we all lose.) But that's politics. Back to the game!
In post 9995, Reasonably Rational wrote:The one thing that makes me pause a little on Creature is that I can't think of any motivation that makes sense for the things he's said. I don't see what he could possibly be trying to gain.
Like this.
There are many words I would like to use for this.
But I'll keep it to a simple one: hypocrite.
You can't shit on me saying this for farside and then turn around to use it on Creature yourself.
Seriously, mate. You don't vote in events and you don't get into alliances (you only managed to ally once in 4 episodes reigning over the slot!). 
