Newbie 515-Abandoned = |

[Hang 'em High]

Original Roll String: 1d6

1 6-Sided Dice: (6) = 6

[Hang 'em High]

Vote: JDGA

The dice say you're scum -- who am I to argue?

[Hang 'em High]

Day 1 is go! With 7 alive it's 4 to lynch!

4 alive? Who did you modkill already?

imeenwut?

[Hang 'em High]

*me shakes fist at Mod with editing powers*

[Hang 'em High]

Obviously you misread -- the name isn't Hang

Me

High. Obviously I'll be expecting your unvote momentarily.

[Hang 'em High]

I just pointed out the L-2 to try and avert suspicion.

I didn't read much JDGA's vote on me, since L-2 is relatively safe. Nobody except the most naive player (whether town or scum) would add a third vote this early and I can't see any reasonable player hammering yet. So, the vote itself didn't mean anything to me. However, the above quote does interest me.

@JDGA

: I didn't find your vote suspicious, but the above quote implies that you thought it would be suspicious. If so, why did you make it?

[Hang 'em High]

Also, given the town is getting suspiscious about JDGA's overly defensive nature, it makes me wonder why Hang 'em High is trying to give JDGA an opening to defend himself against the accusation which could then be taken to defend himself without suspiscious. Hence, a minor

FOS:Hang 'em High

.

I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you find suspicious. Could you please clarify what concerns you and I'll be happy to address it.

[Hang 'em High]

Thanks for the clarification. I wasn't trying to defend him at all -- actually to the contrary I find his actions a bit suspicious. His vote of me wasn't the issue -- to me that was no big deal. But

he

obviously thought placing the vote was suspicious and yet he placed it anyway. He anticipated his vote would open him to criticism and yet he still voted. I don't understand why he would do something he thought would appear scummy. To be fair, I don't think his actions are ridiculously scummy -- but they are odd so I'd like to hear his explanation.

[Hang 'em High]

The case against JDGA is minor (at best) and since my vote was random, I'm going to:

Unvote: JDGA

Unfortunately, there really isn't much of a case against anyone at the moment. However, this quote stuck out at me:

jmar's posted to MS today, yesterday, and the day before, but hasn't posted anything to this game since the 28th. Lurkers make it harder to hunt scum, so

Unvote Sudo_Nym; Vote jmar

.

This isn't much of a case either, but trying to start a lurker wagon this soon is a bit much. Therefore:

Vote: Chris Cutpurse

[Hang 'em High]

Good response -- and I actually agree with you. I didn't really have any issue with your vote at all. My real reason for voting was to see how you would react, and your response was reasonable and not overly defensive. Therefore:

Unvote: Chris Cutpurse