Mafia 73: NEGWLTWWWTKY - Abandoned!

[KaleiÐoscøpe]

Happy Birthday vote: Sikario8

[Sikario8]

YAY! You're here! What motivated you to become scum...?

[KaleiÐoscøpe]

It's not a choice. It's a way of life. You should know that by now.

[Erg0]

Peers: looks like your strategy worked.

Strategy? What strat... erm, I mean... of course it did, it was brilliantly conceived, planned, and executed by myself, so naturally it worked... uh... pssst, what exactly did I do, again?

That would be the one where you stopped reacting to things and waited it out until people got bored with your wagon.

[Toaster Strudel]

Peers: looks like your strategy worked.

Strategy? What strat... erm, I mean... of course it did, it was brilliantly conceived, planned, and executed by myself, so naturally it worked... uh... pssst, what exactly did I do, again?

That would be the one where you stopped reacting to things and waited it out until people got bored with your wagon.

Never claimed, either. Peers is a clever one.

[Mastermind of Sin]

We need more pressure on Jordan.

[Elmo]

^ correct

[Sikario8]

We need more pressure on Jordan.

unvote Kscope

[Mastermind of Sin]

You forgot to vote Jordan.

[Shanba]

Vote Count:
6: Peers

(hasdgfas, Mert, Erg0, Panzerjager, TS, schismatized)

4: Sikario8

(Neo-Viper9, Yosarian2, Sir Tornado, Kscope)

3: JordanA24

(Peers, MoS, Elmo)

1: Toaster Strudel

(Quagmire)

1: ABR

(Battle Mage)

1: Battle Mage

(ABR)

1: MoS

(JordanA24)

Not voting:

Zu_Faul, Sikario8

I'm missing a player... need to go find it.

Edit - found it.

[Sikario8]

We need 10 to lynch right?

vote Jordan

[Erg0]

I don't favour a Jordan lynch. He needs to get the hell in here and say something for himself.

[hasdgfas]

We need more pressure on Jordan.

why?

[Albert B. Rampage]

What did Jordan do already ?

[Quagmire]

Forget it, I'm after Thanatos now, I refute the Mos wagon on the basis of a better wagon.

Going after Thanatos is like hunting baby birds in their nests.

Going after MoS is like hunting tiger.

I'm going to join MoS and policy lynch you in every game I'm in.

unvote, vote toaster strudel

[Peers]

What did Jordan do already ?

I think that, at this point, it's more "Like has he not been doing?" He's giving off serious "Lurk and hope it goes away" vibes.

[Sikario8]

unvote

you guys are confusing me and i'm mistaking you for ppl in other games who've presented their cases.

not that you guys are idiots or anything, it's just that i'm...whatever...

[zu_Faul]

I don't buy the Jordan wagon at all. Now it's just people randomly jumping on it and when Jordan comes back he has to defend himself against such rubbish.

Vote: KaleiÐoscøpe

He did not post anything significant and did a bit of bandwagon jumping.

[Sikario8]

unvote
vote kscope

What was I thinking...?

[Sikario8]

Either way
[quote="zu_Faul"]I don't buy the Jordan wagon at all. Now it's just people randomly jumping on it and when Jordan comes back he has to defend himself against such rubbish.

Vote: KaleiÐoscøpe

He did not post anything significant and did a bit of bandwagon jumping.[/quote]
So are you off of Peers or simply shifting your attention to a more reasonable cause (whatever that may mean)?

[JordanA24]

Sorry for my absence, I've had a huge rush of homework and coursework recently, plus other game commitments kept me out of this one.

Oddly enough, people seem to be voting me for getting a load of coursework (trust me, I'd rather I didn't have it either).

LAL is a horrible idea, if I kept being inactive, the mod would simply be able to replace me, and you could try to lynch someone who is acting scummy if you ignore the lurkers.

I can't really see much in actual evidence against me. I've seen mentions of my jumping off the Peers wagon when it was "clear he wasn't going to be lynched". Not true, Peers was still at -2 when I unvoted him.

Peers still has his Page 8 vote on me, where he said the main reason for voting me was that I had 4 posts, 2 of which were of no content (1 of which was a random vote anyway, so that can be excused really, and the other where I voted Peers, because of his very scummy play up to that point, not that I mentioned it in the post, but that's why I voted Peers). Now I have 10 posts, all of which but two have content, are you still happy to vote me Peers? Especially since your other point against me was this:

He has not explained his reasons for his current vote, which started a bandwagon on that player, and has tried to spin an apology the person he voted for made as 'backtracking', which feels like trying to retroactively justify his vote.

Well, now I've explained the vote, and I didn't start the bandwagon btw, I was the 4th person on it, what made you say I started it?

MOS, have you got any reason for voting me other than that I'm voting you? You're smoke and mirrors accusation was ridiculous, I unvoted Peers when he was at -2, and very lynchable, and I was the

first

person to vote for you. How the hell were you an easy wagon if nobody else was voting you???

What is your opinion on 146 and 333?

What's your opinion on 146 and 333?

I'm still very happy with my MOS vote. His reasoning for OMGUS voting me are nothing more than fictional.

[Peers]

Jordan makes an excellent point; I can't in good faith keep my vote on him.

Unvote

I would like to hear MoS's response to that last post. We may very well be in a situation where the top three bandwagons are all town.

[Sikario8]

Forgive me if this sounds a bit off the wall; however, I've been stricken as of late by the queer feeling that Peers and TS could be distancing. I don't know what to think of this; however, I just want to put it out there to be either shot down or exonerated.

FoS: Peers & Toaster Strudel

I mean, Peers has been in the spotlight for some time and, if she were to defend him, wouldn't TS be put on the spot as well? I don't know, I honestly don't - I'm just throwing something out there.

Vote Count:
3: Battle Mage

(Neo-Viper9, Kaleidoscope, Peers)

3: Kscope

(schismatized, Toaster Strudel, Battle Mage)

3: Peers

(Panzerjager, ABR, JordanA24)

2: NeoViper9

(Yosarian2, Erg0)

1: Paradox244

(Elmo)

1: MoS

(hasdgfas)

1: hasdgfas

(Peers)

1: Zu_Faul

(MoS)

1: Toaster Strudel

(Zu_Faul)

Not voting:

Sir Tornado, Sikario8, Paradox244, Mert

Vote count corrected

It’s crazy, but, way back then, they had their votes equally distributed; however, with the recent turn of attention to Peers,

Vote Count:
6: Peers

(hasdgfas, Mert, Erg0, Panzerjager, TS, schismatized)

4: Sikario8

(Neo-Viper9, Yosarian2, Sir Tornado, Kscope)

3: JordanA24

(Peers, MoS, Elmo)

1: Toaster Strudel

(Quagmire)

1: ABR

(Battle Mage)

1: Battle Mage

(ABR)

1: MoS

(JordanA24)

Not voting:

Zu_Faul, Sikario8

I'm missing a player... need to go find it.

Edit - found it.

they’ve jumped on his – I don’t want to say wagon – caboose to avoid easy detection. But then again, maybe Jordan’s on a different level cuz he’s still voting Peers when Peers has his vote on hasd. I don’t know.

[Toaster Strudel]

@Sikario8 - homework for you!

"Peers has been in the spotlight for some time and, if she were to defend him, wouldn't TS be put on the spot as well?" Problem with that is that I can't find where I allegedly defended Peers. Did you confuse me with another player? Are you making assumptions regarding Peers' alignment? If you are, please state clearly what assumptions you are making. Is Peers town or scum?

Then you wrote: "way back then, they had their votes equally distributed" - Please list every single player whose votes were equally distributed.

Then you wrote: "..however, with the recent turn of attention to Peers, they’ve jumped on his [...] caboose to avoid easy detection." Please name every single player that has hopped onto that wagon AND explain how it helps each one avoid easy detection.

Then you wrote: "Maybe Jordan’s on a different level cuz he’s still voting Peers when Peers has his vote on hasd." Please explain what you mean by "different level" and the significance of Jordan voting Peers while Peers is voting for hasd.

I found your post very intriguing, and thank you in advance for the clarifications.

[Sikario8]

...gtg