Shadow is being lynched. I don’t care about potentialities or conjectures. He claimed scum in thread. He dies. End of story.
Fuzzy can shoot whoever he wants tonight. I would suggest Almost50 but if he feels that strongly about RR or Farside or Grapes he can go there. He goes outside that pool and I’m lynching him tomorrow regardless. And Fuzzy – you absolutely do need to shoot tonight.
If RR is around I’ll coordinate a hammer in thread with them and RR doing the duty.
MoI / Random
Fuzzy / RR
Grapes / Mastin
A50 / farside
--
You do remember tonight is a Season Finale, right?In post 11433, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:I can never fail at 3+ or season Finale........ it specified in my PM
--
At this point I’m not going to veto it. I’d prefer Almost as I am basically 100% sure that farside is not Mafia and not 100% sure that they are “Overthrow the Town” 3rd party but I’m not dead-set against it as we can always lynch Almost tomorrow if we even make it there.In post 11406, Reasonably Rational wrote:@MoI: Can you explain why we wouldn't shoot Farside tonight then, using fuzzys empowered shot? It's not a matter of her throwing in with scum for vote power, it's a matter of her potentially just winning.
--
This sort of paranoia floating already was handled days ago. Again – the amount of flack Varsoon got after Bloodborne about how that turned out is exactly why I very much doubt farside can actively join with scum. Feel free to disagree but I’m not changing my mind on that.In post 11409, Almost50 wrote:The last Varsoon game I was in it took a SINGLE PLAYER (who controlled a dummy slot) to single handedly end the game with 11 players alive. So, if ONE can do it with 11 alive I think it absolutely possible for 3 to do it with 15 alive.
Given that the Event was announced before Night I find it hard to believe you thought somehow it was a tricky trap. Hypo-scum TFL knows this. What does Fuzzy stand to gain from not using a shot you claim (and he also claimed) would be refunded in today’s climax? You are basically saying he’s scum because his team was already screwed out of their normal Nightkill and he actively chose to pass on killing a Town player when that shot is effectively lost (due to the refund mechanic). Which makes absolutely no sense. Scum Fuzzy absolutely shoots whatever Town he can realistically and says “See, I’m a proven Vig”. I mean heck there is a plausible scenario out there that supports that as a possibility but you haven't even looked that way which is why I find your Fuzzy = scum case to be so weak. It doesn't look like you are actually trying to solve the game but instead are grasping at straws.In post 11414, Almost50 wrote:Just THAT. Prevent the kill and catch someone who claimed to be a Town vig choosing to give a pass on an shot that was expiring and getting refunded today.
I exclaimed long ago about my own ability, and Varsoon said it gets refunded at the start of the Season Finale. However, being a 1-shot ability I could not have 2 shots at the same time. In other words I had to use my 1st shot on N3 because it would have expired at the start of Exposition 4, so that I only have 1-shot at the start of E4 (Season Finale 1). That's why I declared I had "nothing to forfeit" and opted to ally with RR on E3, so the damage to town would be minimized (if I recall correct RR had nothing to forfeit as well, so the bonus point from both alliance members willingly opting not to use an active ability wasn't there to begin with).
My point is "I thought" that was some clever trick you pulled out of your sleeve to verify whether TFL was Town Vig or not. Obviously, I was dead wrong.
What part of your Mod Confirmed ability makes any difference to whether you are scum or not? I’m very curious why you think it does.In post 11416, Almost50 wrote:This is really a BRILIANT stance. I'm amazed. So a MOD CONFIRMED FACT isn't really relevant, but setup speculation is the way to go. I should remember that.
Let’s discuss this –In post 11417, Almost50 wrote:Because that's how the game went. I didn't see a regular NK every night. Event kills ARE conditional kills. The Cluster for instance could have been stopped with more points or could've been more damaging if it wasn't somehow contained. That C.O.N.D.I.T.I.O.N.A.L in my book.
Night 1 – no kill
Night 2 – Klingoncelt killed
Night 3 – Not Chara and Firebringer killed
Night 4 – Titus killed
Night 5 – no kill
Night 6 – no kill
Night 7 – no kill
So on the face your statement appears reasonable. Yet specifically Night 5 and Night 7 I have stated I was the reason for the lack of kills (Night 5 protection and Night 7 the Event). So that’s another two Nights with scum kills accounted for. That simply leaves Night 1 and Night 6. Both have reasonable explanations (grapes protected by Not Chara N1, farside shot Night 6). And you are Townreading Grapes and Not Chara’s flip and testimony in the bubble PT is pretty strong evidence. So the only Night you might consider refuting as not reasonable is Night 6.
So even then – kills on 6 of 7 Nights hardly looks conditional to me.
Which is why this argument reeks of desperate scum from my point of view.