Screw the players - Bad Idea - Game Over

hasdgfas · Post Post #5 (isolation #0) » Sun Dec 09, 2007 3:39 pm

xyzzy wrote:
There will be 20 players, whom 4 are scum. All 17 townies have a gun, who can shoot once.
17+4=20?

One of the scum is also a townie, obv.

hasdgfas · Post Post #70 (isolation #1) » Tue Dec 11, 2007 12:12 pm

Bookitty wrote:Skitzer cares about the game, therefore he's obviously /in, therefore I'm saving my bullet for later, when he doesn't expect it.

Did you read the first STP? The first one had Troj, who cared about the game a lot, but was /out.

FoS: Boo

hasdgfas · Post Post #74 (isolation #2) » Tue Dec 11, 2007 12:17 pm

I don't think it's required, but don't make any assumptions on who's /in or /out based on number of posts or how much they care about the game.

hasdgfas · Post Post #91 (isolation #3) » Tue Dec 11, 2007 2:09 pm

destructor wrote:
skitzer wrote:Yeah, i'm in, so what? Last game I tried to fly low, and it failed.
We
're trying a diff strategy.
?

Vote: skitzer

Votes do nothing, but good catch. Royal we?

mnowax wrote:
Shoot Bird111

No hard feelings, Right?

why are we shooting someone else?

hasdgfas · Post Post #97 (isolation #4) » Tue Dec 11, 2007 2:50 pm

shoot: skitzer

hasdgfas · Post Post #110 (isolation #5) » Tue Dec 11, 2007 5:51 pm

and many other people shot him too, so we have no way of determining your /inness

hasdgfas · Post Post #151 (isolation #6) » Thu Dec 13, 2007 4:19 am

no, you shoot someone to end the day.

hasdgfas · Post Post #179 (isolation #7) » Thu Dec 13, 2007 2:42 pm

alan, while I appreciate your tables and all, doesn't posting them give the scum less people to choose from to shoot at? After all, they may agree with your analysis and just decide to NK people who you assume are /in. That table, while it's nice to see that someone is thinking about it, doesn't really help the town AT ALL. We're supposed to be hunting for scum, not just determining who is /in. Although it's bad to waste bullets on /outies, it might be a better idea for each /innie to try to determine who is /in on their own.
1) Like I said before, if there is a list of suspected /innies, the scum have a better chance of hitting /innies and making the game done with faster.
2) It's only your opinion, other people might disagree.

FoS: Alan

you seem to be trying to lead the town.

hasdgfas · Post Post #182 (isolation #8) » Thu Dec 13, 2007 2:52 pm

Obviously the town needs to know who's in, but posting a giant list does help the scum, as it gives them something to work with at the least. I'm saying that if we get stuck talking about someone or a couple of people, we could discuss their /inness one at a time rather than giving the scum a huge list to choose from.

hasdgfas · Post Post #217 (isolation #9) » Sat Dec 15, 2007 8:31 am

I thought we didn't lose bullets if we shot after someone was dead?

hasdgfas · Post Post #248 (isolation #10) » Sun Dec 16, 2007 11:31 am

Rishi has said that he's out, but I'm not sure I believe it. I want to see him shoot someone to prove himself.

hasdgfas · Post Post #252 (isolation #11) » Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:46 pm

He has said that he's out.

hasdgfas · Post Post #253 (isolation #12) » Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:47 pm

therefore shooting someone wouldn't do anything to prove him town or out or scum. Never mind, I was thinking and just now realized that it wouldn't do anything.

hasdgfas · Post Post #256 (isolation #13) » Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:12 pm

could you elaborate on your reasons for suspecting me please. besides the one statement that wouldn't create a waste of a bullet anyway?

hasdgfas · Post Post #285 (isolation #14) » Tue Dec 18, 2007 4:51 pm

v/la after shooting someone, great.

hasdgfas · Post Post #303 (isolation #15) » Wed Dec 19, 2007 12:25 pm

vote:
shooter:PokerFace
target: Rishi

Best idea at this point, I think.

hasdgfas · Post Post #307 (isolation #16) » Wed Dec 19, 2007 2:39 pm

has it been 24 hours since those shots?

hasdgfas · Post Post #330 (isolation #17) » Fri Dec 21, 2007 3:06 am

The vote counts are making it seem more like PokerFace is scum and he wants as many people as possible to agree before he does anything. Since it's completely obvious that more people want him to shoot Rishi than anything else happening, he appeared to be stalling so that he wouldn't have to.

hasdgfas · Post Post #342 (isolation #18) » Fri Dec 21, 2007 4:27 pm

I think someone really needs to shoot PF tomorrow

hasdgfas · Post Post #346 (isolation #19) » Fri Dec 21, 2007 5:41 pm

By someone I meant me. I'm planning on doing it in my first post tomorrow unless something huuuuuge happens, so make sure all your affairs are in order and that you say your prayers tonight

hasdgfas · Post Post #349 (isolation #20) » Fri Dec 21, 2007 6:02 pm

Have you read his posts?
The "vote count" thing does not fill me with confidence in his townness and the majority of people who I've seen here think he is scum.

hasdgfas · Post Post #351 (isolation #21) » Fri Dec 21, 2007 6:29 pm

If I agree with them, I agree with them. Agreement != scumminess.

Basically, you had plenty of chances to shoot Rishi/whoever, but you wanted to wait and make sure it was what the town wanted, as though you didn't want to be blamed for doing something wrong. I smell scum there, and I will be shooting you tomorrow. If you think I'm scum, then you should have nothing to worry about because I won't kill you. If you're scum, like I think you are, then you should be scared, because I can and will kill you tomorrow.

hasdgfas · Post Post #371 (isolation #22) » Sun Dec 23, 2007 5:39 am

I think he'll post as soon as he can. Then we'll find out if he's dead or not.

hasdgfas · Post Post #372 (isolation #23) » Sun Dec 23, 2007 5:40 am

Freudian slip there Rishi?

hasdgfas · Post Post #393 (isolation #24) » Thu Dec 27, 2007 12:45 pm

shoot: pokerface

hasdgfas · Post Post #394 (isolation #25) » Thu Dec 27, 2007 12:45 pm

just like I said I would

hasdgfas · Post Post #396 (isolation #26) » Thu Dec 27, 2007 2:09 pm

You calling me foolish? Maybe I am. We'll find out soon, won't we. This is mafia after all, and we shouldn't trust anyone until the results come.

hasdgfas · Post Post #399 (isolation #27) » Thu Dec 27, 2007 2:23 pm

PF: what are you talking about. cephir isn't the mod. Why would he give you a win condition?

hasdgfas · Post Post #404 (isolation #28) » Thu Dec 27, 2007 5:55 pm

hasdgfas wrote:PF: what are you talking about. cephir isn't the mod. Why would he give you a win condition?

And why would /outs have a win condition anyway?

hasdgfas · Post Post #405 (isolation #29) » Thu Dec 27, 2007 5:56 pm

EBWOP: they're not even in the game so a win condition doesn't make logical sense.

hasdgfas · Post Post #410 (isolation #30) » Fri Dec 28, 2007 4:58 am

Alan Redgown wrote:
Rishi wrote:
hasdgfas wrote:EBWOP: they're not even in the game so a win condition doesn't make logical sense.
Maybe we're in a separate concurrently running game?
What? Ooh, I want to be an annoying /out in that game!

Me too!

hasdgfas · Post Post #412 (isolation #31) » Fri Dec 28, 2007 1:15 pm

then could you explain what you meant by win condition for /outs?

hasdgfas · Post Post #463 (isolation #32) » Thu Jan 03, 2008 3:59 pm

I still think Alan is scum

hasdgfas · Post Post #508 (isolation #33) » Sat Jan 05, 2008 2:52 pm

Alan should shoot so we can find out if he's scum or not.

hasdgfas · Post Post #528 (isolation #34) » Tue Jan 08, 2008 3:11 am

but that should be a good thing

hasdgfas · Post Post #532 (isolation #35) » Tue Jan 08, 2008 9:30 am

Guardian, if you're not /in with a bullet and you're not scum, stop posting. Otherwise, you need to be shot.

hasdgfas · Post Post #546 (isolation #36) » Thu Jan 10, 2008 4:47 pm

how are you all doing?

hasdgfas · Post Post #572 (isolation #37) » Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:26 am

Whoever is still /in with a bullet needs to shoot someone or else we're not going to get anywhere.

hasdgfas · Post Post #574 (isolation #38) » Sat Jan 12, 2008 12:46 pm

Quick?
Anything but at this point.

hasdgfas · Post Post #581 (isolation #39) » Sat Jan 12, 2008 4:33 pm

Seriously, if you think someone is scum, then shoot. We're not going to get anywhere otherwise.

hasdgfas · Post Post #584 (isolation #40) » Sun Jan 13, 2008 6:46 am

Alan Redgown wrote:
Discussion = good. Suddenly taking a huge risk and possibly losing the game for the town = bad. It's that simple.

Nobody is discussing at this point, though, which is the problem with that plan.

hasdgfas · Post Post #587 (isolation #41) » Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:09 pm

YL: if you shoot wrong, you WILL be last person to shoot. So you better hope you're not the last to shoot because it appears our other /in with a bullet is lurking.

hasdgfas · Post Post #636 (isolation #42) » Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:11 am

YL doesn't have a bullet? hmm...

hasdgfas · Post Post #676 (isolation #43) » Sun Jan 20, 2008 6:27 pm

<.<
Well, I was trying to help the town until I fake-shot. Then I was just like, "let's try to get shot."
That was quite entertaining, I think.
PF: I did think you were /out because you seemed to put a bit too much of something into that game, but you were missing something. The way you played kinda reminded me of me, so I figured that you were /out.

Also, I think Kscope was

way

too generous with lurking. The town had no shot(pun intended) at winning this game.

hasdgfas · Post Post #690 (isolation #44) » Tue Jan 22, 2008 5:32 pm

Kinetic wrote:
Elmo wrote:
Cephrir wrote:
Alan Redgown wrote:
Guardian wrote:
Guardian wrote:who did the scum try to kill at night?