In page four we had a L-2 situation (Even if the count was wrong, that was my reality at the moment). I wrote that post in a hurry, since I had to leave for work, and by the time I logged in again, there were other things to consider (Destructor's "fake" vote, which made the vote count obsolete. There were also misplaced names).
Most of my games are themed minis, and usually there are three mafias. Since I have no idea how many mafiosos are there, I chose the most common number.
Phate and ryan: You look like two deaf people shouting at each other.
Slip #1 was when he said scum know all vanillas are lettuces, when in fact no one knew (Unless he misunderstood the safe claim he was given).ryan wrote:1st slip was using “safe claims” and acting like they were known to everyone when if there were safe claims only the mafia would know them (not townies)
2nd slip was saying that he didn’t know what safe claims were BUT yet he just used it in post 245 to attempt to explain himself
Also there were two votes on me, I don’t know how that is considered heat or pressure on me, care to explain?
Slip #2 was when he said that scum don't have safe claims, when the only ones to know that are scum.
Do you always agree with things you don't understand?
I don't need to vote you to put pressure on you (And that's not what I was trying to do anyway). I can just lure you to expose the inconsistencies between what you say and do, and then show them to everybody. Then I'll ask a question which will require an answer, that will probably create more difficult questions.
So, ryan, why do you keep using other people's logic for your votes, when it is obvious you don't really share it (or understand it)? Is it too hard to create an original accusation when you know the one you're accusing is town?
Let me re-read and then I'll add some comments.
