Luls...Panzerjager wrote:I've officially stopped reading Korlash's post due to them being stupid and a waste of my time.
The only one deserving of lynch is OTM. All you have against me and Phate is that we have lives.
Hmm, which OTM's individual posts? Sorry, I'm a bit lost and lazy.QuickBen wrote:First of all, I didn't realize that my use of the word "skim" would be taken so badly. I'm not a newbie, I've just been away from the game for a while. To me, skimming wasn't a bad thing because it wasn't the only reading I had done. I've been reading along as we go, so I went back and skimmed to refresh my memory as to what I had already read. I find that it's really quite useful when your mind is stuck, the way that looking too closely at a pointilism picture can make you miss the big picture.
My vote on OTM (which doesn't seem to have counted?) was due to being on the fence about his individual posts, where I couldn't decide if it was his playstyle that was pinging the scumdar or if he was actually committing scumtells. By skimming the thread, instead of getting more comfortable with his playstyle, it made me more suspicious. (Hence my vote.)
Any other questions?
I'm not letting it wash under the table. I'm just more concentrated on Ben. Speaking of which...Panzer wrote:All I really need to add to this is I'm shocked your letting korlash wash all the OTM talk under the table
You still haven’t explained this statement.Phate wrote: I still find OTM scummier than QuickBen, although Zhao's post makes my bus alert tingle.
I actually agree with you here. I’ve felt that Korlash has been taking a lot of pot shots at people and not going further. His shifting good cop/bad cop routine against me is annoying and strange. Recently thought he has focused more on just PanzerJager and then you.Phate wrote: Is it just me, or does anyone else find Korlash more and more scummy as time goes on? He hasn't connected himself with anyone really, but he's throwing out suspicions of everyone left and right, he's purposefully oblivious to the fact that newbies play differently than more experienced players (and thus what's scummy for a newbie is different than what's scummy for an experienced player), and his logic sucks, as is evidenced in the last post.
I was mocking you Holy, but now that I think of it, you might have made those faulty statements just to get me to react and say statements that could be used against me later.Korlash wrote: @ Holy: I believe he was just being a sarcastic ass. Or that is how I took it. I would be very interested in seeing him actually try to pass any of those off.
I ask you to point out where I’m phishing and you point out the post I asked you. This is confusing.Holy wrote:Well... ^this is one. Phishing.Zhao wrote:Show me.Holy wrote: Not because your disagreement with the plan, that plan indeed had flaws although if there's not too much WIFOM in it it may works good for the town if you really follow the thought process. So, it's more from the discussion process, your reactions along the plan whether it was pro/cons.
And because lately you're phishing a lot too.
So you’re saying that if someone is calling me scummy but I’m innocent, the correct play would be to ignore them? Trying to prove innocence is not recommended?Holy wrote: You are already suspicious. Why are you so concerned being suspicious anyway? If you did nothing wrong or at least didn't do anything too badly, no one or at least the majority won't even look at your case. You care about this too much. Scummy...
Reasoning?mike wrote: Hello. I am MBF. I brisky skimmed the thread and now I want to vote for everybody, starting with Quickben, Korlash, and Phate, not necessarily in that order.
vote: Phate
Could you be more specific? I would like to know details.QuickBen wrote: My vote on OTM (which doesn't seem to have counted?) was due to being on the fence about his individual posts, where I couldn't decide if it was his playstyle that was pinging the scumdar or if he was actually committing scumtells. By skimming the thread, instead of getting more comfortable with his playstyle, it made me more suspicious. (Hence my vote.)
Actually it woudl be better to stop talking about it... If all think it a good plan then drop it until the day is almost over.Zhao wrote:BTW, you haven’t talked about your plan for some time, and there was no consensus by everyone not to do it. Have you given up trying to sell it? Don’t tell me it was just some elaborate smokescreen.
Again, no reason for me to give evidence on him being innocent when no one has any evidence of him being guilty. (at least worth a lynch) And when did I throw around Pro-town statements?Zhao wrote:I actually agree with you here. I’ve felt that Korlash has been taking a lot of pot shots at people and not going further. His shifting good cop/bad cop routine against me is annoying and strange. Recently thought he has focused more on just PanzerJager and then you.
He’s said we should slow down on the OTM lynch but didn’t provide any reasoning why OTM could be innocent, nor source anyone else for this. I’m speculating he might be throwing around pro-town statements to make himself more resistant to lynch.
So... you be an ass to someone, then try to claim it is what that person wanted you to do? Your messed up in the head...Zhao wrote:I was mocking you Holy, but now that I think of it, you might have made those faulty statements just to get me to react and say statements that could be used against me later.
Yet you say nothing to Panzer and very little to Phate. To afraid to talk to your partners? Seriously... if you want details say something to Panzer. He hasn't done anything lately.Zhao wrote:Could you be more specific? I would like to know details.
O yeah, sorry. Got it.QuickBen wrote:@Holy- i meant that I was looking at his posts separately, not taken as a group, which is what i did on the re-read/skim however you want to put it.
There's something that bugged me about Phate. At first, his plan seems could come out either from a townie or scum, so I'm still neutral about him.Korlash wrote:*waves hands*
You want to vote for Phate!
You are not unsure!
He is scum!
Would I lie to you? =D
Nope, I was just try making others look to your case too.Zhao wrote:I was mocking you Holy, but now that I think of it, you might have made those faulty statements just to get me to react and say statements that could be used against me later.Korlash wrote: @ Holy: I believe he was just being a sarcastic ass. Or that is how I took it. I would be very interested in seeing him actually try to pass any of those off.
Well, at least suspicious for me (and if I wrong, then my bad...), that's why I said if your acts wasn't that bad, majority won't suspect you as scum anyway. And I didn't say that trying to prove innocence is not recommended, it's an effort made to survive, so why not.Zhao wrote:So you’re saying that if someone is calling me scummy but I’m innocent, the correct play would be to ignore them? Trying to prove innocence is not recommended?Holy wrote: You are already suspicious. Why are you so concerned being suspicious anyway? If you did nothing wrong or at least didn't do anything too badly, no one or at least the majority won't even look at your case. You care about this too much. Scummy...
