Open 57 - Quack Mafia (Game Over) before 545

Oman · Post Post #5 (isolation #0) » Wed Dec 19, 2007 8:21 pm

First.

Owned.

Vote Crub

Unvote

Damn!

Vote Lulubelle

Town in the last game we played, must be scum this time!

Oman · Post Post #9 (isolation #1) » Wed Dec 19, 2007 9:18 pm

If you had posted 6 minutes earlier I wouldn't have been first.

Win.

Oman · Post Post #11 (isolation #2) » Wed Dec 19, 2007 10:15 pm

..fuck.

Unvote Vote Oman

Lynch all Liars.

Oman · Post Post #19 (isolation #3) » Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:29 am

Phate, what does your post mean?

Oman · Post Post #26 (isolation #4) » Thu Dec 20, 2007 5:22 pm

Crubmod:

Will Quacks only kill Town players?

Correct - Crub

Oman · Post Post #29 (isolation #5) » Thu Dec 20, 2007 6:34 pm

unvote vote no lynch

Oman · Post Post #36 (isolation #6) » Fri Dec 21, 2007 6:49 am

You admiting you know I'm pro-town?

Oman · Post Post #37 (isolation #7) » Fri Dec 21, 2007 6:51 am

I'm pretty sure MoS' breaking strat can be broken, but I'd rather not reveal cause then the mafia will know it.

Oman · Post Post #40 (isolation #8) » Fri Dec 21, 2007 7:31 am

shaft.ed wrote:
Oman wrote:You admiting you know I'm pro-town?
You have reason to believe you aren't pro-town?

That doesn't even make any sense, especially in context of my line.

Oman · Post Post #42 (isolation #9) » Fri Dec 21, 2007 11:38 am

Why does nobody keep they're vote on me (it must be love).

Oman · Post Post #47 (isolation #10) » Tue Dec 25, 2007 12:43 am

I'm a quack.

Oman · Post Post #49 (isolation #11) » Tue Dec 25, 2007 12:29 pm

How hilarious. Anyway, I targeted TDP, so I'm a quack.

Oman · Post Post #54 (isolation #12) » Tue Dec 25, 2007 4:17 pm

Umm..everyone had to protect the person above them. Thus: people should know who protected who.

Oman · Post Post #64 (isolation #13) » Sat Dec 29, 2007 1:53 am

Did I ever mention how it could be broken?

Mafia No-killing.

Oman · Post Post #66 (isolation #14) » Sat Dec 29, 2007 12:14 pm

Well it distorts the numbers.

If you look at how MoS was saying "1 kill we know this, this, and this" and then all of the other stuff that occured after it ("two scum in green, one in red, possibly seven in blue") means that the entire excercise was essentially worthless except those of us who do suspect ourselves of being quacks should not use their power anymore.

Oman · Post Post #69 (isolation #15) » Wed Jan 02, 2008 1:09 am

Oman · Post Post #83 (isolation #16) » Thu Jan 03, 2008 11:39 am

Because MoS, no plan is perfect and you're more experienced then me, thus I figured that you would've probably factored a no-kill into the equation.

As we've seen its not really "breaking" anyway, as it leaves numbers. All a no-kill does is fuxxes up the numbers.

Oman · Post Post #86 (isolation #17) » Thu Jan 03, 2008 6:44 pm

I didn't think that was a problem at the time. I see now how if effects it.

Oman · Post Post #97 (isolation #18) » Fri Jan 04, 2008 11:17 am

Wait, aside for the dead docs there are no confirmed townies, okay?

Only scum that didn't kill the person they were meant to protect, and the rest of us.

Oman · Post Post #106 (isolation #19) » Sat Jan 05, 2008 3:57 pm

Quack = town.

Mafia = Mafia

Mafia != town.

Thus Quack != Mafia.

Oman · Post Post #123 (isolation #20) » Tue Jan 08, 2008 12:05 pm

Vote MoS

We've just discussed that any 2 town deaths tonight is game over.

Oman · Post Post #137 (isolation #21) » Fri Jan 11, 2008 3:28 pm

All quacks (you know who you are) DO NOT KILL!

Everyone else, protect anyone (quack or not) that you think is town.

Oman · Post Post #140 (isolation #22) » Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:22 pm

Lulubelle wrote:Would the scum rather target an unprotected quack over a possibly protected doc?

YES!

They only really need two town kills overnight, plus 1 mislynch in between them (this is if quacks don't target).

If you don't protect the quacks, thats three kills for free.

Lulubelle wrote:but if we hit scum everything would change.

I doubt it, they'll still go for a confirmed kill over a maybe.

Oman · Post Post #142 (isolation #23) » Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:55 pm

Okay MoS, I'll take that WIFOM trap.

GO GO DOCS!

Oman · Post Post #158 (isolation #24) » Sun Jan 20, 2008 12:34 am

MoS is getting away with his last plan.

Oman · Post Post #183 (isolation #25) » Sun Jan 27, 2008 5:15 pm

MoS should die, he pushed two plans, the second which would've handed scum the game.

Oman · Post Post #196 (isolation #26) » Tue Jan 29, 2008 1:37 pm

farside22 wrote:I just found it frightening that I agreed with oman. Did hell freeze over?

Come to the Dark Side, and together we can rule MS.net!

Oman · Post Post #238 (isolation #27) » Mon Feb 04, 2008 1:26 pm

MoS, its sad to see you go

I really hope you come back later.

Oman · Post Post #255 (isolation #28) » Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:57 am

HoS Farside

Horrible reason for a Lylo vote. One thing saved you: scum rarely vote first in Lylo.

Shaft.ed looks town for asking Farside to remove the vote.

I also think Shaft.ed is town from the last two days.

Vote: Phate

I think he is scum, and am willing to vote on it.

Oman · Post Post #280 (isolation #29) » Mon Feb 11, 2008 12:18 pm

Sorry shaft.ed. Quack Mafia lost my interest a bit. Re-reading.

Oman · Post Post #283 (isolation #30) » Tue Feb 12, 2008 8:19 pm

I'm here.

Happy with my vote.

Oman · Post Post #298 (isolation #31) » Thu Feb 14, 2008 12:49 pm

LTG wrote:Oman stated that "scum rarely vote first in lylo..." and then... voted in lylo?

Of course, sometimes they do, but I know when I'm scum I prefer to wait for a quicklynch to swoop down on.

LTG wrote:Is Oman trying to draw attention away from his attempt at a quicklynch?

This is not an attempt at quicklynch, this is so far from it. This makes me believe you're phate's buddy.

LTG wrote:He accused farside of having a "horrible reason" for voting in lylo... and gave a non-reason for voting Phate.

Farside did have a horrible reason to vote when he could have lost the game. However, I've thought phate scummy for a while now and I was right. Farside's problem was it was pretty much "The dead townie said you were scumz, therefore you're scumz."

Farside wrote:I love hypocrites.

Hey, I'm voteing because I found scum. You were voting because a dead townie told you to.

Tyler wrote:Antoher side of me says that if he is scum, then why would he want to mention the hole in the strategy?

I saw a different flaw to the one that acutally came out, but basically I wanted to mention it because I wanted people to not put much faith in it. I personal voted for the strat, but mos' second plan was just terrible.

I'll look at kuribo after we lynch phate. Unless you lynch me, in which case...we'll there are enough docs around.

Did any doctor protect phate last night? What about quacks?

Oman · Post Post #303 (isolation #32) » Thu Feb 14, 2008 1:15 pm

I'd be inclinded to think farside a quack at this point.

We had 3 quacks come forward. At least one of them (from phate and me) is scum (its phate btw). Which means we have a missing quack. Farside protecting phate would not have killed him, because he's teh mafmaf.

Oman · Post Post #304 (isolation #33) » Thu Feb 14, 2008 1:16 pm

Tar, why did me and shaft.ed get pushed down the list?

Oman · Post Post #310 (isolation #34) » Thu Feb 14, 2008 1:36 pm

Shaft.ed wrote:When did Phate become scum? Last time I checked his alignment wasn't revealed yet. And you still haven't made any case against him.

Why is Kuribo called LTG btw?

Cause otherwise he'b be quicklynched.

Oh, and kuribo's avatar reminds me of laptop guns. Why am I phate?

shaft.ed wrote:You're making rather drawn out conclusions from such a simple scenario by which farside is a doctor so phate didn't die, or farside is scum making up the whole thing. This feels like an Oman farside push to take down Phate.

Tell me where else the missing quack fits then?

Oman · Post Post #313 (isolation #35) » Thu Feb 14, 2008 1:48 pm

Considering everyone is posting, and either of us could get to -2 with no hassle, a quicklynch would not be hard.

Oman · Post Post #326 (isolation #36) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 12:55 pm

shaft.ed wrote:Posting is very pro-town

But a very weak tell either way.

Oman · Post Post #331 (isolation #37) » Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:00 pm

shaft.ed wrote:You're making rather drawn out conclusions from such a simple scenario by which farside is a doctor so phate didn't die, or farside is scum making up the whole thing.

Not really, its the logical conclusion if you take phate to be scum (as I do). Firstly, phate, myself, and someone else said they were quacks. If we take phate out, we miss a quack. However farside had an unknown role (in the doc/quack field) farside is therefore the missing quack. IF farside is the missing quack then phate would not have died. Phate did not die, therefore theory A supports and is supported by theory B.

The first one is merely an opinion, I think scum would've gone for the quicklynch.

Oman · Post Post #336 (isolation #38) » Wed Feb 20, 2008 2:11 pm

shaft.ed wrote:Oman you continue to push for Phate's lynch without making any case.

As you do to me.

Oman · Post Post #338 (isolation #39) » Wed Feb 20, 2008 2:51 pm

I agreed that it wasn't 100%, but it IS a matter of opinion.

The MoS lynch should not be an anti-town tick in

my

box. He was suggesting things that lost the game for the town N2!

Wasn't it phate who suggested Quacks use their powers as cops?

Oman · Post Post #347 (isolation #40) » Thu Feb 21, 2008 7:57 pm

shaft.ed wrote:
Oman wrote:Wasn't it phate who suggested Quacks use their powers as cops?
So this is your case against him? Nothing more? That was played out in it's entirety yesterday. You didn't say a word. I've seen enough.

vote: Oman

No, thats not it, it was merely a point.

I want to ask you, what is scummier, Suggesting that quacks try to use their power as cops when two NKs (mafia+1) will end the game, or attacking somone who suggests quacks circle protect when two NKs will end the game?

Oman · Post Post #349 (isolation #41) » Fri Feb 22, 2008 10:19 am

shaft.ed wrote:The second suggestion is clearly more anti-town.

lulz?

shaft.ed wrote:Also Oman, you have two votes on you, yet you haven't be quicklynched. Are you then more scummy than Phate since he wasn't quicklynched with one vote?

You're not going to cause a double standard are you?

Oman · Post Post #352 (isolation #42) » Fri Feb 22, 2008 11:33 am

shaft.ed wrote:
Oman wrote:
shaft.ed wrote:Also Oman, you have two votes on you, yet you haven't be quicklynched. Are you then more scummy than Phate since he wasn't quicklynched with one vote?
You're not going to cause a double standard are you?
Just demonstrating how wonderfully your logic works.

And your fallicious faliure is a delicious faliure.

Oman · Post Post #372 (isolation #43) » Tue Feb 26, 2008 9:54 pm

Kuribo is correct.

Oman · Post Post #390 (isolation #44) » Thu Feb 28, 2008 1:55 pm

Lulz, Shaft.ed. You seem to have caught yourself in an illogical hole where farside is scum purely from OMGUS!

Oman · Post Post #398 (isolation #45) » Sat Mar 01, 2008 11:07 pm

I will not self hammer, but I'm really not happy with that vote Kuribo, even though I understand why you're doing it.

I am town, Kuribo looks like bored town.

Oman · Post Post #400 (isolation #46) » Sun Mar 02, 2008 2:14 am

The scum couldn't already be on?

Oman · Post Post #413 (isolation #47) » Sun Mar 02, 2008 8:41 pm

Well I had shaft.ed pinned. That was a terrible argument he had against me.

Ah well, That game was horriblised from the first night.

Oman · Post Post #416 (isolation #48) » Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:51 am

Hehe, thanks. I just couldn't push the lynch correctly. I fail.

Oman · Post Post #419 (isolation #49) » Mon Mar 03, 2008 6:34 pm

You were wrong on me, MoS.

Oman · Post Post #422 (isolation #50) » Tue Mar 04, 2008 12:57 am

Mastermind of Sin wrote:
Oman wrote:You were wrong on me, MoS.
You were wrong on me, Oman.

...

Vote MoS