Food Fight Mafia - WHO OWNS THE SCHOOL???

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #1275 (ISO) » Sat Dec 22, 2007 6:09 am

Skruffs wrote:ABR:
Why would you try to post restrict a cop when BM had offered to be your test subject?

Who cares, its just a PR.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1276 (ISO) » Sat Dec 22, 2007 7:43 am

Gorrad wrote:
Mod:
Did you count my gummy bear at ABR in your foodcount?

Gummy bear added. Go figure! It was camouflaged in ABR's hair.

Korlash · Post Post #1277 (ISO) » Sat Dec 22, 2007 9:19 am

>.> After all that Skruffs wants to get back to Ckillor...

To be honest I would think Lunch lady would be a scum role. As would Librarian. Just in thinking. Librarians hate noise, what is a food fight but half noise? And the lunch lady spent all that time making food... only to have it thrown around.

Battle Mage · Post Post #1278 (ISO) » Sat Dec 22, 2007 10:05 am

Skruffs wrote:Yup.
I am "the Lunch Lady".
My role is the ability to distribute 3 bad behavior notes a day.

Ok so your ROLE is called ' 3 BB Notes' or what?
Because i have a specific defined role in my pm, aside from my BB notes.
and unlike me, and others i have seen so far, you dont have an actual name, just a profession?

Hmm...

Skruffs wrote: BM - I think you are really playing a dangerous game, as you have been proven to be lying about your claim, which evolves slowly as the game goes along. First one thing, then you check with the mod and it's another. What I'm, sayin gis, YOU don't really have the basis to use your claimed role to try and coutner someone else's, because you have already been shown to state things 'without checking hte facts' in an attempt to get someone lynched.

Fair point. But i think you have read the situation a little wrong here. If there is a difference between our role logistics (as i had suspected wrongly there was, and now there seems to be again) 1 of us must be scum. I dont care if it takes me being lynched in order to lynch a scumbag. In fact, i'd even consider it a decent trade.

Skruffs wrote: I guess my question to you is, You seem to have FOUR parts of your role PM:
Your name "Gertrude"
Your Profession(?) "Librarian"
Your Role "Vanilla"
and additional actions "1 BB Note"

I personally believe that the Name and Profession part should only occupy one slot. FOr that reason, I have a strong feeling you are lying. I'd really hate to get lynched to prove that you are lying, because we already have proof WITH EVERY OTHER DAED PLAYER so far, but it IS worht considering.

FFS. I'll tell you what, why dont i ask the Mod to resend me my WHOLE role pm?

Skruffs wrote:
For Future Reference, please note BM has both a name and a profession

Duly noted.

BM

Battle Mage · Post Post #1279 (ISO) » Sat Dec 22, 2007 10:09 am

Skruffs wrote:Okay, that siad, let's get abck to ckillor/mneme.

*sigh*
Does anyone else get the impression that Skruffs' attacks on me are merely a backdrop while he puts his weight behind simpler lynches?

BM

Korlash · Post Post #1280 (ISO) » Sat Dec 22, 2007 10:53 am

Yup.. I too get that feeling. Only in more of a "Scum bussing partner" or "Scum putting other scum second on his list" type of feeling. >.> Librarians need to go down...

Battle Mage · Post Post #1281 (ISO) » Sun Dec 23, 2007 1:33 am

-.-

Happy scumday DGB!

vollkan · Post Post #1282 (ISO) » Sun Dec 23, 2007 2:10 am

Korlash wrote: Yup.. I too get that feeling. Only in more of a "Scum bussing partner" or "Scum putting other scum second on his list" type of feeling. >.> Librarians need to go down...

More krap logik from Korlash

Are you actually suggesting that we lynch the librarian because of your theory about how it

could

be a scum role?

Flameaxe · Post Post #1283 (ISO) » Sun Dec 23, 2007 8:03 am

vollkan wrote:
Korlash wrote: Yup.. I too get that feeling. Only in more of a "Scum bussing partner" or "Scum putting other scum second on his list" type of feeling. >.> Librarians need to go down...
More krap logik from Korlash

Are you actually suggesting that we lynch the librarian because of your theory about how it
could
be a scum role?

Hell, we're already following the ckillor lynch because of list position...lets just go after Skruffs because Librarians "need to go down".

Skruffs · Post Post #1284 (ISO) » Sun Dec 23, 2007 8:47 am

Happy birthday dgb!

Can someone point out where fatty mcfartypants got hit by dairy? He claims to have tried to PR a cop, but he said earlier that he needed to be hit by dairy first. And i don't remember anyone hitting him with any dairy, but i haven't checked.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1285 (ISO) » Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:19 am

Skruffs wrote:Happy scumday dgb!

You'sho wulcome... i'm sho drunk on scumnog a'ready... big pa'ty here!

Battle Mage · Post Post #1286 (ISO) » Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:19 am

Flameaxe wrote:
vollkan wrote:
Korlash wrote: Yup.. I too get that feeling. Only in more of a "Scum bussing partner" or "Scum putting other scum second on his list" type of feeling. >.> Librarians need to go down...
More krap logik from Korlash

Are you actually suggesting that we lynch the librarian because of your theory about how it
could
be a scum role?
Hell, we're already following the ckillor lynch because of list position...lets just go after Skruffs because Librarians "need to go down".

Erm since when would an attack on Librarians be an attack against Skruffs?

Battle Mage · Post Post #1287 (ISO) » Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:19 am

and Skruffs... it isnt DGB's birthday. :p

vollkan · Post Post #1288 (ISO) » Sun Dec 23, 2007 1:19 pm

Skruffs wrote: Can someone point out where fatty mcfartypants got hit by dairy? He claims to have tried to PR a cop, but he said earlier that he needed to be hit by dairy first. And i don't remember anyone hitting him with any dairy, but i haven't checked.

Nightfall in 1177 wrote: *Stuffs the following into a balloon and then hurls it at Lowell*
1 x roast beef sandwich
1 x can of peaches
1 x Pack of gum
1 x protein drink

P.S. Do cheese doodles count as Dairy?
pops a bag of cheese doodles over ABR's head.

Unless some other dairy item got thrown at ABR, then the cheese doodles might be it.

In fact, I just looked up the nutritional information for "Cheese Doodles" and they contain calcium, in contrast to the other snack products from the same company, which suggests that cheese doodles are indeed a dairy product (at least in real life)

Flameaxe · Post Post #1289 (ISO) » Sun Dec 23, 2007 1:35 pm

Battle Mage wrote:
Flameaxe wrote:
vollkan wrote:
Korlash wrote: Yup.. I too get that feeling. Only in more of a "Scum bussing partner" or "Scum putting other scum second on his list" type of feeling. >.> Librarians need to go down...
More krap logik from Korlash

Are you actually suggesting that we lynch the librarian because of your theory about how it
could
be a scum role?
Hell, we're already following the ckillor lynch because of list position...lets just go after Skruffs because Librarians "need to go down".
Erm since when would an attack on Librarians be an attack against Skruffs?

Bleh, mixed you two up. I double task too much....It messes with my brain...

Gorgon · Post Post #1290 (ISO) » Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:39 pm

Okay, I've read the game now, and feel quite embarrased over my entry into it. Thing is, from ABR's comment I thought there was some kind of pressure for everyone to throw all their food before the deadline. I picked The Fonz randomly, and didn't know anything about anyone's roleclaims. I know you only have my word for this, but this is the truth, although DGB can probably verify that I did indeed not get my role PM until just before I started posting in this game.

Anyway, the argument between BM and Skruffs is pretty bizarre and annoying at times. However, one argument that I felt was very convincing was the discrepancy between the way BM's and Skruff's BB notes worked. Therefore, I find it incredible to learn now that BM only tonight thought of asking for a clarification of the way his BB notes worked - not sure what to make of this, but it certainly doesn't look good. Then again, town-BM is often certain of things that turn out to be wrong, and he has admitted this mistake of his.

Regarding cicero's analysis of the deceased Lowell's attacks, it is an interesting fact that he picked on Gorrad that much. I agree that it looks a little over the top to be distancing, but he did start of doing this very early (which to my mind is a slight sign of possible distancing). Also, it's now clear that there are now most likely two scum groups, right? The administration scum who dismiss students, and the soup scum who boil them. This means that scum as well as town don't necessarily have to be fabricating their cases - scum could be attacking each other across groups. I must say that I got a bad vibe from Gorrad while reading through the game, so he could well be scum.

vollkan wrote: Unless some other dairy item got thrown at ABR, then the cheese doodles might be it.

In fact, I just looked up the nutritional information for "Cheese Doodles" and they contain calcium, in contrast to the other snack products from the same company, which suggests that cheese doodles are indeed a dairy product (at least in real life)

Interesting - and now Nightfall is dead, and the PR cannot be verified. IMO, Nightfall could have been killed for these reasons:

- ABR is scum, and didn't want his fabricated post restriction to be proven wrong (but then, why would he fabricate something like this in the first place? Hmm ...)

- Someone killed Nightfall in order to make ABR look bad (A stupid use of a NK IMO).

- Nightfall was killed because of good play/someone guessed he was Tar's mason partner (Most likely, I think - not discounting the other options, though).

Btw, regarding Tar's role, yesterday he claimed he had investigative powers, but today he has not revealed any results (only Nightfall's results). Why is this?

The theory of the player list is also highly interesting - we seem to have some strong evidence that people are indeed ordered by their roles (all three gossiping masons grouped together, and the specialised cops grouped together). It's kind of lame that this seems to be game relevant, but I guess everything that's useful for winning is fair game, so ckillor is definitely not a stupid lynch, if only to test this theory.

Korlash · Post Post #1291 (ISO) » Sun Dec 23, 2007 8:03 pm

Vollkan wrote:More krap logik from Korlash

Are you actually suggesting that we lynch the librarian because of your theory about how it could be a scum role?

Yup...

<.< Besides, when has a librarian ever been good for us honest messy kids anyways?

Flameaxe · Post Post #1292 (ISO) » Sun Dec 23, 2007 8:14 pm

When they let you hide in the book return and scare people like my librarian does.

Korlash · Post Post #1293 (ISO) » Sun Dec 23, 2007 8:25 pm

sweet...
Hmm I have been thinking.. There is a cafeteria cop, So i think one scum group is cafeteria orriented. So, One Soup goon down, one lunch lady to go.

Now we get into hard parts. Administrations... Would Librarian be more likely pro-town Vs. Pro-Scum. Seeing as how secretary was pro-town you could assume every "office" faculty is pro-town. Or, you could think every faculty except secretary (i.e. person who loves kids and hates boss) is scum. So Principal, librarian, gym teacher... coudl all be roles possible in administration scum group.

There. Put a little thinking and turned my Krap logic into a well balanced, well verse pile of Krap. All in a days work I think...

Skruffs · Post Post #1294 (ISO) » Mon Dec 24, 2007 4:27 am

A) Skruffs is the Lunch Lady, not the Librarian
B) ABR targetted The Fonz, who was a claimed cop, with a supposed PR even thought other players asked him to target them (Why he would try to target someone he thought was scum with a PR is beyound me, and why he would try to target a claimed cop is also beyond me), NOT Nightfall (who never got a chance to claim) or BM, who both asked to be targetted.
C) Tarhalindur claims to have received an innocent on me last night, Korlash has not revealed his result at all, yet, though Tarhalindur has claimed Nightfall's result.

Korlash: Why is it possible that the secretary was pro-town faculty but lunch lady can't be? Also : Did you miss "Soup Scum Goon"? One fo the scum groups is obviously named "Soup Scum" - I'm not sure why the doctor (if any) didn't protect The Fonz after he confirmed that there was a Food-Group mafia (everyone thought it was an SK until he said it was "people" not "person"). Maybe they did but the doctor was scum group specific as well - like one person mentioned yesterday about TSS.

Tarhalindur: Why did you think that based on Nightfall's result it's likely he's naive? He came up with an innocent on you - right? UIs there a reason he should not have?

People who are implying that me and BM are scumbuddies distancing: You are an idiot. Why don't you read BM's incredibly blatant fishing about how Bad Behavior notes work, and his misclaims, and his general un-knowledge fo the game that he is intentionally screwing up to try and get whoever he wants claimed, just READ his posts, just in isolation if you want, and you will see why I keep bringing up attention to him. Apparently the entire TOWN has received innoculations against Measles, Mumps, and Battle Mage, except me, because nobody NOBODY seems to give a DANMN about his horrible, scummy, play. Except, maybe, uh, maybe Skruffs is his *partner* and that's why they are arguing. YEah. BEcause BM's lying and misclaiming, that's fine, but when someone points it out, that's just 'distracting the town', when it seems that half the players in the game

either

have no idea who claimed what, don't remember who said what, don't *care*, and are too busy picking their noses to actualyl scum hunt.

Well I feel better:

Mod: Are Cheese Doodles dairy?

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1295 (ISO) » Mon Dec 24, 2007 5:12 am

Skruffs wrote:
Mod: Are Cheese Doodles dairy?

Keyword: Cheese, Answer: Yes

Korlash · Post Post #1296 (ISO) » Mon Dec 24, 2007 2:05 pm

>.> Man... you sure act like a mean ol' lunch lady...

I think a "lunch lady" is more of a scummy type faculty member, then a secretary. Although, should someone claim gym teacher I'm all over his butt!!!! >.> That did not sound wrong at all...

Secondly...

Take a Bite out of Crime wrote:Also : Did you miss "Soup Scum Goon"? One of the scum groups is obviously named "Soup Scum"

Sorry... With all your talk of multiple scum groups, and scum specific cops I assumed you actually believed it and/or were not an idiot. I'm sorry to say i must be wrong on both accounts. Seeing as we have a dead "Cafeteria Cop" I take it to believe one scum group is the "cafeteria mafia" thus meaning it can have a freaking Soup goon, Fry cook Role blocker, and god dang Lunch lady godfather. There is nothing saying the scum group has to be called "Soup scum." How many people does it take to make a pot of soup?

As for your rant I have very little to say. I don;t think the two of you are partners. But I do have suspicions your both scum. Then again I am usually wrong.

Flameaxe · Post Post #1297 (ISO) » Mon Dec 24, 2007 2:07 pm

Korlash...he came up SOUP SCUM GOON, which is implying a SOUP SCUM GROUP.

Korlash · Post Post #1298 (ISO) » Mon Dec 24, 2007 2:21 pm

Ok then... go with that... Ending is the same, lunch lady has a higher chance of being in the "soup scum" scum group then anythign else I can think of.

Also, because I never let things go and I love my Krapy logick sometimes, How does "cafeteria oriented" not in some way describe "soup scum" scum group? So even when I'm wrong I still come up right in the first place.

Suck it scum!

Skruffs · Post Post #1299 (ISO) » Mon Dec 24, 2007 3:56 pm

No matter what evidence comes up, people are going to say I'm SK... no wait, mafia... no not taht mafioa,t his mafia.. no wait... godfather...

Why not just suggest I'm the Godfather of BOTH scum groups AND the principal???

Back to original argument: WHY WOULD I CLAIM LUNCH LADY IF MY SCUM GROUP WAS "SOUP SCUM"?!