I'd like to take a step back. I understand that you got past the argument about the fake hammer. In 128 (posted below), you mentioned that he was scum for bringing up unrelated reasons. Do you still believe them?
In post 128, Martha Zolanski wrote:But on this post, you are scum and basically encouraging everyone to use the 2nd lynch to have 2 players lynched (which has a possibility that they're town together). "Throwing that away" isn't what town would do. We basically chose to NL for a reason, so therefore, we aren't throwing that away.
see sheepy votes like this are why it's worth resisting a N_M lynch
and why did you go from wanting an N_M lynch to casual indifference
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
But you don't think it could have scummy intentions behind it. I'm not asking if there is, I'm asking that you can at least acknowledge that N_M did it solely to look like it was bad play when he had a plan in mind.
In post 239, Hiraki wrote:TierShift due to the fact that there's not enough content but that's purely subjective. I also have a good feeling about him.
1) Arguments and reads can change. You satisfied the prior argument and now I have a new one.
2) Pushing the blame on other people for not announcing L-1 or L-2 is a very very lame defense.
3) 256 is purely subjective.
In post 257, Hiraki wrote:1) Arguments and reads can change. You satisfied the prior argument and now I have a new one.
You have a new one because you need to push your narrative, not because you had a revelation.
Hiraki wrote:
2) Pushing the blame on other people for not announcing L-1 or L-2 is a very very lame defense.
Are you confused here? I'm not voting people for not announcing l-1 or l-2. I'm not defending not_mafia either, but I'm not voting him, and that's a good portion of why. If you think he should be lynched, you push on him. You're asking me to defend him, which I have no interest in doing.
Hiraki wrote:
3) 256 is purely subjective.
What's objective about it is that you asked to be lynched in order to reveal associations, and I'm obliged to follow your request.
Fixed, but your prod still counts even though you beat me to the message.
Also, what is NM doing? Worst play I’ve ever seen.
I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.
I'm guessing you haven't read the game and probably never will? Why even sign up to play?
Sorry I've already read the game three times I didn't feel like there was much more I could say beyond that I was willing to vote for NM if TLH wasn't going to work.
I didn't like how GL took a hard angle on my case v. TLH when they supposedly had a scumread on Martha.
Hiraki appeared and asked the same questions I was asked twice over
Like, I'll go over it re: 239 just in the case that my word choice made sense in my head but not others.
1) I think it was indicative of someone wanting the Alisae wagon to look chaotic
2) I don't think the posthumous hammer is necessarily scum
3) (2, cont) with the assumption of double scum on the wagon, I think the fake hammer is AI. Continuing that line of thought I think it's most likely NM to necessitate point 1.
I get the impression from Hiraki's post 239 that they appeared to want to work with myself but didn't seem to care to do the same with NM or TLH. I think the triple vote is pretty dishonest here. Who exactly do you want to lynch today?
I thought THL attempted to hammer Alisae, but he was the first one to vote Alisae I think?
Well, I think that fake hammer isn't scummy af since I think some people use that as a RT.
ok...........
I'm not sure how I feel now/quote]
What does "I'm not sure how I feel now" mean?
I do not want to post my assumption yet, but I don't like what this post is sounding. @TLH, can you explain this?
I GUESS YOU NEEDED A PAP ᵖᵃᵖ ᴾᴬᴾ ᴾᴬᴾ ᵖᵃᵖ ᵖᵃᵖ ᴘᴀᴘ PAP PAP ᴘᴀᴘ ᴘᴀᴘ ᴘᴀᴘ pap ᵖᵃᵖ ᴾᴬᴾ ᴾᴬᴾ ᵖᵃᵖ ᵖᵃᵖ
ᵖᵃᵖ ᴾᴬᴾ ᴾᴬᴾ ᵖᵃᵖ ᵖᵃᵖᴘᴀᴘ ᴘᴀᴘ ᴘᴀᴘ
