It was my fate to randomly vote against him.
Also with regard to everything that happened on Page 1, according to Oman's Rule 07, this really shouldn't be discussed in scumchat, so you guys may want to watch out for a modkill ya know.
How is saying "you may want to watch out for a modkill" the same as saying, "I want people to be modkilled"?xyzzy wrote:Yes, why? This struck me as quite odd.JDodge wrote:Why do you want people modkilled?Incognito wrote:Rofl. That's a lot of stuff on page 1 already.
Vote: Phate
It was my fate to randomly vote against him.
Also with regard to everything that happened on Page 1, according to Oman's Rule 07, this really shouldn't be discussed in scumchat, so you guys may want to watch out for a modkill ya know.
The only form of punishment that Oman had listed in his rules was Summon Nature's Modkill V on the person breaking one of his rules. I figured that form of punishment would essentially apply to any rule that was broken by someone.JDodge wrote:Why do you think people who break that rule will be modkilled and not replaced or some other such thing?
Why would talking to scum only lead to one and only one thing? I think JDodge makes a fair point in stating that the scum could trick town in private conversations. And actually, I believe that tricking town is the more likely scenario as opposed to totally slipping up.xyzzy wrote:JDodge, if I were scum, talking to me could only lead to one thing - a total slip-up. Why wouldn't you want that?
a hypothetical situation or did this actually occur? Also could you please answer my question from Post 54?xyzzy wrote:JDodge, the whole point of private communication is that you can see things people don't normally show - if I'm asking you questions in a chat and you're taking 5 minutes to answer, I won't trust your answer.
If I've been following along with the thread correctly, then I know that your vote on xyzzy actually placed him at L-1. I fail to see how a wagon can maintain its randomness when a player is being placed that close to a lynch. When I see something that strikes me as off, I'm not just gonna sit there and allow it to happen; I'll try and voice my opinion about it. I find your deflective suspicion towards me to be a very interesting response.Adel wrote:sounds to me like our random wagon has a scumbuddy trying to get an alternative wagon going.
Adel, I can't tell if your posts are scummy or just coming from a townie with really poor logic. And since your logic is so crystalline, I have a hard time believing it's the latter. If we just lynch xyzzy and call it a day, what kind of solid information would we have to go by tomorrow if he happens to come up town? I could see the solid amount of information derived if he comes up scum but not the inverse. To me, a xyzzy-town lynch leaves too much room for a massive cop-out from everyone involved in the xyzzy wagon. The only practical thing I could see coming out of it from xyzzy-town is the decreased scope we have to deal with to find the scum, which is why I would lend my vote to the wagon if it came down to the wire. The obvious practicality of it would be seen if he does happen to come up scum. Right now though, I'm really liking my Adel vote.Adel wrote:or we could just lynch xyzzy and call it a day...
Xyzzy, why did you wait so long to call Adel out about this?xyzzy wrote:Adel, your attitude of "let's just lynch randomly to see what it gets us" is super-scummy. Why, specifically, is that a good idea? Because I can't see ANY reason to random lynch. My death wouldn't even provide the town any useful info.
Unvote, vote Adel
scotmany12, in post 134, wrote:Hi everybody!
Do you ever say anything else besides this?scotmany12, in post 162, wrote:hi everybody
Adel wrote:Yes, sorta, maybe. Hopefully. He did cast a OMGUS vote on me. Besides a little bird told me that he was scum, and that little bird was correct 12.34 times out of the last 14. That is pretty good.NabakovNabakov wrote:
@Adel: Just out of curiousity, do you think Xyzzy is scum?
*Bonus* Why or why not?
kabenon, you mentioned as a side note that he was scum in your first game. Are you suggesting that you think he's scum here?kabenon007 wrote:I personally don't get dazzled by vollkan's massive posting, as he and I duked it out pretty well in my first game here. Be he town or scum, he does provide much information either way. So I just let it continue. As a side note... he was scum in that game...
I don't know. I've actually been reading through vollkan's Mini 542 around the time that this Mills character fakeclaimed Godfather and sure enough, vollkan-town did place a vote against Mills to actually hammer him. This meta is at least consistent with his views in our Open 59 game. As for the other meta you've provided, NabNab, I'll have to look that over.NabakovNabakov wrote:Comments?
I don't mind having my identity revealed (ironic, eh?). I was the one who agreed. I thought it was strange early on how kabenon specifically chose the xyzzy wagon as opposed to the JDodge one in his first vote of the game. Kabenon responded in a way that somewhat lessened my suspicion so my negative feelings about him did decrease. Phate's current case against kabenon is extremely convincing, and I think he could use a bit more pressure soPhate wrote:In the interim, I talked to a few people. One agreed, but not strongly; one thought I was overreacting. I'll reveal their identities if I need to.
JDodge, this isn't even about vollkan anymore. He's stating that this is a description ofJDodge wrote:Where has he ever not given a wealth of information on how he feels?kabenon007 wrote:Like, he gets a person in his sights and doesn't provide information about them, he just goes "Oh lynch so-and-so die scum die lols."
If anything,youfit this description rather well.
before having him that close to lynch.kabenon007 wrote:You misunderstood. I can't post now about it, I have class, but when I return, there shall be some clarification. You misunderstood something that has become a point of contention that I believe can alleviate some stress here.
While I agree with you for the most part, I don't think L-1 is the right way to go about it at this time. kabenon promised that he would follow up with content and while the likelihood of someone hammering him while he's at that position is unlikely (especially if he's scum), I'd rather not take that chance. I'm still extremely interested in seeing what Xtoxm has to say about the game so far, and I still dislike Adel's posts in this game. I feel like she's almost getting a free ride while other people scrutinize each other or defend her actions.Mizzy wrote:I doubt he'd get hammered because the folks that haven't voted him seem to think he's sincere...otherwise I would not have put him at -1L. I wanted some pressure on him to respond well to what I've said and what others have said...I'm sick of his wishy-washy responses.
This is why I jokingly vowed in another game to never play with Adel again. It sucks playing in a game with her where there's only two groups: vanilla or scum. It's because of players like her that cops are necessary.Mizzy wrote:Well, he's not at -1L now, so that fixes that. On your point about Adel, people have tried to question her directly in the past and we've not gotten good responses. You can only lead a horse to water, but you can't make them drink. It sucks, but if a player is unwilling to play along, we can't force them, even if it does give them a free ride.
kabenonMizzy wrote:In fact, this bullshit case is such a distraction that I can't imagine a kabtown would be doing such a thing. He'd be trying to validly scumhunt, not pull random "facts" out of thin air that are actually groundless opinions that are most likely based on his own tendencies of playing scum himself...in which case, there is proof in this thread (his making errors due to mis-reading, whether intentionally or unintentionally) that fit him square into his own case for scum.
and then his complete flip-flop of opinion to vote for JDodge here:kabenon007 wrote:I agree with JDodge on this one.Vote: vollkan.You are in fact dodging questions with your long posts that can seem contentful but shirk around the important stuff sometimes, by preventing reactions. Reactions to the words written on this thread are, in my opinion, the most telling of all the information we have. Okay, so it's not quite THAT important, but it's pretty high up on the list. And your stepping in did in fact hamper those reactions, and therefore the information given to the town. And plus, you are acting way too close to our first game. It's almost word for word.
And now recently instead of continuing to find evidence to support his cases and diminish the suspicions of a number of players within the thread, he's pushed that all aside and cast completely deflective suspicion towards Mizzy, another person whom he had never expressed any suspicion towards until Mizzy directed an attack on him. This recent attack against Mizzy feels OMGUSy to me. Because of all this, I feel comfortable putting kabenon at L-1.kabenon007 wrote:Jdodge just basically told me that he hasn't been reading the thread very much, except for skimming my posts and trying to trounce them, because if taken by itself, it would appear that my post was against vollkan, but if taken in context, it is obvious that I was talking about Jdodge. And only scum don't read threads.unvote, vote:Jdodge
A deflection of suspicion doesn't necessarily require an actual vote. In your case, you mentioned that Mizzy is number 2 on your list after JDodge. What happened to your previous suspicions against vollkan? Where does he rank on your list?kabenon007 wrote:And then what would you call my "painting someone in a bad light" if I were town? You are assuming I am scum. Not a good thing to do. Besides, my attack is on JDodge, not Mizzy, at the moment. I merely said it seems that she is trying to buddy up to vollkan. Did I vote her? No. So how is that trying to deflect suspicion?
Mizzy, I don't understand this statement. How could he know whether or not he's been talking to a townie unless he's scum? Both yours and Phate's statements seem to have some implied knowledge within them. We can't do anything about this now since it's twilight but we'll clearly have plenty to discuss come morning.Mizzy wrote:Phate, who have you been talking to? If it's a townie, then you might get mod-killed, and if you don't get mod-killed or mod-smacked in some way...then you didn't break the rules...