You came on yesterday with no commentary whatsoever and put him at -1. You still have not answered the question, which was not "debate semantics of this word", but "give your reasoning for your vote".curiouskarmadog wrote:why was it sneaky, and why didnt you answer my question yesterday? Almost seems like you were laying the groundwork for a lynch today like you knew Phate was town. Wasnt your vote on him too?JDodge wrote:Vote: CKD
What was with that sneaky little -1 vote?
vote Jdodge
Mafia 71: The Corsican Syndicate - Game over!
-
-
JDodge Accept it
- Accept it
- Accept it
- Posts: 5926
- Joined: May 6, 2005
- Location: Atop my cloud
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
skitzer Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2097
- Joined: September 1, 2007
-
-
skitzer Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2097
- Joined: September 1, 2007
-
-
JDodge Accept it
- Accept it
- Accept it
- Posts: 5926
- Joined: May 6, 2005
- Location: Atop my cloud
I did want to lynch Phate. Stop strawmanning me. I want to know why you hopped on Phatecuriouskarmadog wrote:so then you didnt really want to vote Phate yesterday? Because as it stands you helped lynch Phate, but started pointing fingers at me yesterday even before we learned his alignement..I wonder why that is?without giving any reasoning. Stop avoiding the damn question already.-
-
Peers Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 856
- Joined: July 18, 2007
- Location: North Dakota
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
Peers rolled his eyes.
And then he rolled them more.
In fact, his whole body began to twitch. Foam began to bubble from the corners of his clenched jaws.
His hands clenched in tight little balls, as his entire body seized up. His heart couldn't take the strain.
It gave out.
Peers, Vanilla Towniehas died frompoisoning.
What a twist!-
-
Porochaz Oh, Prozac
- Oh, Prozac
- Oh, Prozac
- Posts: 9317
- Joined: September 6, 2007
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
mostly his voting pattern...but what I think is interesting that you started this bullshit yesterday before we even discovered his alignment. Tell me, why did you start it then versus today?JDodge wrote:
I did want to lynch Phate. Stop strawmanning me. I want to know why you hopped on Phatecuriouskarmadog wrote:so then you didnt really want to vote Phate yesterday? Because as it stands you helped lynch Phate, but started pointing fingers at me yesterday even before we learned his alignement..I wonder why that is?without giving any reasoning. Stop avoiding the damn question already.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
QuickBen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 176
- Joined: November 10, 2007
- Location: North Ridgeville, OH
-
-
Porochaz Oh, Prozac
- Oh, Prozac
- Oh, Prozac
- Posts: 9317
- Joined: September 6, 2007
-
-
Porochaz Oh, Prozac
- Oh, Prozac
- Oh, Prozac
- Posts: 9317
- Joined: September 6, 2007
-
-
JDodge Accept it
- Accept it
- Accept it
- Posts: 5926
- Joined: May 6, 2005
- Location: Atop my cloud
How does me being suspicious of Phate mean that I cannot be suspicious of you for hopping on his wagon without any reasoning?curiouskarmadog wrote:
mostly his voting pattern...but what I think is interesting that you started this bullshit yesterday before we even discovered his alignment. Tell me, why did you start it then versus today?JDodge wrote:
I did want to lynch Phate. Stop strawmanning me. I want to know why you hopped on Phatecuriouskarmadog wrote:so then you didnt really want to vote Phate yesterday? Because as it stands you helped lynch Phate, but started pointing fingers at me yesterday even before we learned his alignement..I wonder why that is?without giving any reasoning. Stop avoiding the damn question already.
And you hopped on him for "mostly his voting pattern"? What the hell is up with that?-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
yep, I felt his voting record was enough for my vote...what part of that are you not understanding?
I dont care that you are jumping on my ass for "hopping on his wagon". I care about the timing. It is one thing for you to do it today (after we found out his alignment) but you slipped up and did it yesterday....and sure enough he turned up town and you continued you push today.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
JDodge Accept it
- Accept it
- Accept it
- Posts: 5926
- Joined: May 6, 2005
- Location: Atop my cloud
You continually avoid my questions. I'll post it again since you seem to have a problem with basic reading comprehension.curiouskarmadog wrote:yep, I felt his voting record was enough for my vote...what part of that are you not understanding?
I dont care that you are jumping on my ass for "hopping on his wagon". I care about the timing. It is one thing for you to do it today (after we found out his alignment) but you slipped up and did it yesterday....and sure enough he turned up town and you continued you push today.
Answer it.How does me being suspicious of Phate mean that I cannot be suspicious of you for hopping on his wagon without any reasoning?-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
IT is all about the timing, what part of laying the groundwork for tomorrow's lynch do YOU not understand. If Phate came up scum, would you continue to bust my balls today. You are trying to make me look scummy, while completely down playing your own vote on Phate..
why?
if I remember correctly your "reason" and vote were quite weak.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
Peers Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 856
- Joined: July 18, 2007
- Location: North Dakota
-
-
JDodge Accept it
- Accept it
- Accept it
- Posts: 5926
- Joined: May 6, 2005
- Location: Atop my cloud
The complete and utter lack of logic in this post is readily apparent. If you're trying to build a last-second case on me, try better please.curiouskarmadog wrote:IT is all about the timing, what part of laying the groundwork for tomorrow's lynch do YOU not understand. If Phate came up scum, would you continue to bust my balls today. You are trying to make me look scummy, while completely down playing your own vote on Phate..
why?
if I remember correctly your "reason" and vote were quite weak.
Yes, I would have. Your timing was most suspect. If Phate was scum, it was a convenient bus all the same. Since you knew Phate was town, in your case it was a convenient lynch.
I am not trying to downplay my own vote on Phate. Phate's play was incredibly poor, and at the time I did fully believe he was scum. And you can't say my reason was weak when I actuallygavereason as opposed to you who just plopped a -1 vote down for no reason whatsoever.-
-
skitzer Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2097
- Joined: September 1, 2007
-
-
Skruffs Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Pantsman
- Posts: 6341
- Joined: July 25, 2005
- Location: Tower of Babel
-
-
JDodge Accept it
-
-
Porochaz Oh, Prozac
- Oh, Prozac
- Oh, Prozac
- Posts: 9317
- Joined: September 6, 2007
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
JDodge Accept it
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.