Thok wrote:Guardian wrote:Thok wrote:Are you suspicious of Thesp, who has basically taken the same position with respect to this option as I have?
Not very, and I find that to be something of a misclassification.
You brought (at least explicitly) this 3rd point up first, and to my understanding are using it to support your suspicion of the Iammars wagon.
I am not using that as a way to support suspicion of the Iammars wagon. Given that you claim to have no idea what it is, I can't see how you can reasonably claim I'm using that as a way to attack people.
I thought you cited "mysterious 3rd point" as one of your reasons for being wary of the Iammars wagon. No?
That is an extremely easy way I can reasonably claim that you are using it as a way to attack
people
ideas.
Using a mysterious, unclarified, secret point to support your stance was precisely the reason I found you suspicious. You talk about something you are keeping purposefully vague, you talk about a 3rd unmentioned possibility, you talk about assumptions that you are unwilling to make -- assumptions that you are even unwilling to disclose what they are -- and use that as a basis for your stance.
Yeah, I find that suspicious.
---
Thesp wrote:Erg0 wrote:Guardian wrote:Ergo wrote:I agree that he hasn't been abused by the mod - that was my point in the first place. Once you eliminate that possibility, the alternative theory would be that he made what seems to me like an unreasonably large leap of logic and tried to clear himself with a wild guess at flavour during the confirmation stage. I don't subscribe to this theory.
Consider this hypothetical thought process:
I am in a game called pirates v. ninjas.
-->In this game, pirates oppose ninjas.
I am ninja scum
There is a town, and I as scum oppose them.
-->Pirates are town.
You consider that to be an unreasonably large leap of logic?
In the context of this game, yes it is. It's common knowledge that Stoofer's games always have a twist, Mars would have to be a raging moron to make such a baseless assumption.
I don't see how "Stoofer's games have a twist" invalidates the hypothetical thought process. At all.
I'd like to hear a response to this.
Thesp wrote:Iammars wrote:Thirdly, since Thesp asked nicely, I will claim pirate/not pirate. I'm not a pirate. However, I'm not too familiar with my character, so I'm not 100% sure.
This feels very weasel-y. Happy with my vote.
Not sure if it sounds weasel-y to me, but I don't think there is a better place for my vote at the moment.
Thesp wrote:Gorrad wrote:His piratey confirmation. It was a weak tell, but still the biggest I'd seen in the first few pages. I'm satified with his explanation, though, so I'm back to no leads so far.
What other explanation would you have expected? "Aw, shucks, you got me"?
I'd like to hear a response to this.
Thesp wrote:Claus wrote:You say that Iammar's alignment tells us about Gorrad. Why? That flew completely over my head.
Please re-read Gorrad in the context of IammarsScum, then in the context of IammarsTown, and I suspect you'll get quite a different read.
I did this read, and... I'm not sure I see what Thesp is seeing. I'd like others to consider this and draw their own conclusions, and have discussion about it.
---
Mgm wrote:Guardian wrote:Second -- MGM, are you saying you find me suspicious for calling someone out for a 5th vote?
I haven't decided yet. First I'd like to hear you answer my question.
Well, MGM, I asked because I wanted to see how vested an interest you had in the game/how close you were paying attention. I didn't accuse anyone of spuriously making too quick a vote -- I in fact was asking hasdgfas why he
didn't
make a 5th vote -- I think large wagons are generally productive at this point in the game, and was questioning his hesitancy.
---
MBF wrote:I'm reading posts at random, in a way. I just see what was said lately and if I think I need to, I'll go back check a few posts I missed. Obviously this is not good play, but Day 1s bore me to tears.
Day 1s bore me as well, and more importantly I think that long day ones are extremely hurtful to the town -- I would love it if this one ended in about 7 more pages, and definitely no more than 20 total. Still, I *try* to read everything, and at least skim back at what I might have missed... Your "obviously not good play" and joking post that follows this one does nothing to assuage my suspicion of you.
---
I want to emphasize this: I think we should really try and end this day before the twenty page mark. If you are all mafia-saints that have hours to devote to combing through 40 page day ones, then I commend you. But no matter how much time it takes us to get there, as long as we have heard in a meaningful way from every player and have a reasonable lynch candidate, I want the day over before 20 pages. I've been in games where people oppose this, and say long days are better since there is more information, and that I am being weak.
Guess what -- almost everyone is weak. Very few people are going to go back and read 30,40,50 pages of day one nonsense. Maybe this game has an disproportionate amount of such people -- but I know at least that I am not one of them. I hope I have support in this.
Do not lynch me.
[wiki]Great Nibbler Takeover of 2008[/wiki]