I wrote:Someone summarize the case on GS. I'll reread when I get home.
I wrote:OK, let me just call it right here: I'm 72% sure that GS is scum - his 71 is really sticking in my head after a reread. Also, forgot the number, but EJ's post ending with his vote of RC and his "diescumdie" strikes me as far out-of-character for EJ. I'd give a good 50% that he's scum. I've only played one game with him here (his first newbie; I was town and he won as scum), but I've played many on IRC with him, and he's never this sure this early. I'd hypothesise that they're members of separate scumgroups.
Also, fairly sure RC is town, if only because people I consider scummy are all leaping onto his wagon.
Vote: GreasySpot
GS wrote:I hope no one takes you seriously on this. You signed up to play the game right? You read and make up your own mind.I wrote:Someone summarize the case on GS. I'll reread when I get home.
FOS: Phate
I wrote:GS, note my very next post on the subject, made precisely when I promised it would be made, and note my references to posts and evidence given. What's FoS-worthy about asking other people why they're voting someone?
GS wrote:@ angelmouse: armix came in and voted after a prod with no reasoning given and jumped on my wagon. I find that scummy. As you eloquently put it earlier that 2 votes doesn't make a wagon. By the way angel where is your vote?
I wrote:GS, you still haven't responded to either of my posts.
I wrote:Also, GS, I'm not liking the disparity between "OMFG U JUMPED ON A WAGON!!!!!!!" and "Why aren't you voting, person who dares to point out my logical errors?"
GS wrote:@ phate: Not to get into semantics here but I didn't see any questions in the posts you are referring too. As far as "What is FOS worthy?", you come in here after a prod and start pointing fingers and casting votes. Care to elaborate on my disparity you call out in post #140?
I wrote:Way to totally dodge everything I just pointed out, GS.
Normally, I'd just quote myself, but I'm pretty sure you're scum anyway and so does most everyone else. it seems, so eh.
I think this exchange speaks for itself. Can we get a lynch over here?GS wrote:@ Phate: I don't know what your reading but I didn't dodge anything.
I also am not going to hammer you for a similar reason that i find some of the poeple on your waggon fishy as well. i would also like to see this information as well and i think it would help your case.oEJo wrote:Greasy Spot: I'm not going to hammer you. I refuse to believe that most of the people on your bandwagon are town-aligned.
It appears your lynch is inevitable, unfortunately.
Could you give us a list of suspects and why? Even a top few and bottom few would help. Anything to help us look back on information tomorrow.
Later he states a 2nd vote is not a bandwagon, but he thinks it odd I'm the 2nd vote against someone.armlx wrote:FOS Farside. Rallied on GS, jumped off to rally on Rosso, now jumping off to rally again. Doing lots of latching on to votes (always 2nd on wagon very shortly after).
It appears to me you keep trying to build on starting wagons in the hopes one spirals out of control. Hence the FOS.farside22 wrote:I'm not going to hammer GS. I still have issues with armix for his comment.
Later he states a 2nd vote is not a bandwagon, but he thinks it odd I'm the 2nd vote against someone.armlx wrote:FOS Farside. Rallied on GS, jumped off to rally on Rosso, now jumping off to rally again. Doing lots of latching on to votes (always 2nd on wagon very shortly after).
I am trying to get reactions to why people are doing what they are doing that is how you find scum. Not by following a bandwagon.
OhGodMyLife wrote:IMO armlx is scummier than greasy spot thus far and it seems really likely that this wagon has been orchestrated by in large part by scum. As I said before, GS came out of the debate between himself and Rosso looking more like the scum, so in the end as the town seems to think is necessary that one of them be the lynch today instead of looking anywhere else, I do support his lynch over RC's, but I'm not going to be the last vote.
Also, oEJo's questions are intelligent and should be answered.
If she wanted to be on a wagon that was spiraling out of control, why wouldn't she just tack her vote onto the GS wagon with no explanation? Oh wait, thats what YOU did.armlx wrote:It appears to me you keep trying to build on starting wagons in the hopes one spirals out of control. Hence the FOS.farside22 wrote:I'm not going to hammer GS. I still have issues with armix for his comment.
Later he states a 2nd vote is not a bandwagon, but he thinks it odd I'm the 2nd vote against someone.armlx wrote:FOS Farside. Rallied on GS, jumped off to rally on Rosso, now jumping off to rally again. Doing lots of latching on to votes (always 2nd on wagon very shortly after).
I am trying to get reactions to why people are doing what they are doing that is how you find scum. Not by following a bandwagon.