Thespival Mafia (Denouement)
-
-
RossWilliam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: December 25, 2007
- Location: New Jersey
-
-
PookyTheMagicalBear Pooky got your back
- Pooky got your back
- Pooky got your back
- Posts: 40522
- Joined: August 17, 2003
-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
-
-
hasdgfas Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5628
- Joined: October 2, 2007
- Location: Madison, WI
-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
-
-
hasdgfas Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5628
- Joined: October 2, 2007
- Location: Madison, WI
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
so you think he is scummy because he said mith was scummy, what about me, I thought GS was scummy and he turned out to be town.and refresh my memory where was your vote day 1?RossWilliam wrote:he made a lot of contradictions on day one, and he was quoted as saying mith was extremely scummy when mith is, obviously not. same reasons as everyone else.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
Holy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 567
- Joined: September 18, 2007
- Location: Blue Earth
His reason voting GS was overabundance IMHO, seems fake.Monkey wrote:
You lied earlier, what makes you think you'll be believed now?Greasy Spot wrote:I AM THE JESTER!!
Vote: Greasy Spot, b/c:
1. He lied
2. He requested it, and
3. I think that there's more then enough material that been covered here on the 1st day.
That places Greasy Spot at L-2 btw. Keeping him around for endgame just isn't very appealing to me atm, and if he really is the jester then that's one less party to compete for 1st place with.Vote: Monkey.-
-
RossWilliam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: December 25, 2007
- Location: New Jersey
I didn't vote for a reason. I'd understand these attacks if I voted for him off the bat. I want to see how he responds to the new votes on him as well. Can we at least wait til that happens before we get this RW bandwagon going? I'm honestly very suprised by this, I wasn't aware I was apparently being so scummy-
-
Sarcastro Sarcastric
- Sarcastric
- Sarcastric
- Posts: 1623
- Joined: June 2, 2006
- Location: Monkey Island
-
-
Monkey Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 80
- Joined: January 5, 2008
- Location: Wildwood
What's fake about it? I didn't make any of that up.Holy wrote:
His reason voting GS was overabundance IMHO, seems fake.Monkey wrote:
You lied earlier, what makes you think you'll be believed now?Greasy Spot wrote:I AM THE JESTER!!
Vote: Greasy Spot, b/c:
1. He lied
2. He requested it, and
3. I think that there's more then enough material that been covered here on the 1st day.
That places Greasy Spot at L-2 btw. Keeping him around for endgame just isn't very appealing to me atm, and if he really is the jester then that's one less party to compete for 1st place with.Vote: Monkey.-
-
RossWilliam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: December 25, 2007
- Location: New Jersey
Sarcasto, I don't like that one bit. You hammered GS, which I can't and won't condemn in and of itself, but now you're voting for me while actually admitting that you don't even really have a reason. You just fully owned up to jumping on a bandwagon for no good reason.
FoS: Sarcasto
and please don't write this off as OMGUS because it is anything but. You're getting yourself a bad track record my very oppurtunistic friend-
-
Holy Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 567
- Joined: September 18, 2007
- Location: Blue Earth
-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
Scum usually doesn't notice they're being scummy.RossWilliam wrote:I didn't vote for a reason. I'd understand these attacks if I voted for him off the bat. I want to see how he responds to the new votes on him as well. Can we at least wait til that happens before we get this RW bandwagon going? I'm honestly very suprised by this, I wasn't aware I was apparently being so scummy
Now why did you say 'mith was obviously not scummy'?
Sarc claimed he agrees with Pooky for now. Not that just that is a good reason, but it's definitely not claiming for no reason at all. You are misrepresenting him and you sound frantic about this wagon while trying hard to not offend anybody else into voting you.RossWilliam wrote:Sarcasto, I don't like that one bit. You hammered GS, which I can't and won't condemn in and of itself, but now you're voting for me while actually admitting that you don't even really have a reason. You just fully owned up to jumping on a bandwagon for no good reason.
FoS: Sarcasto
and please don't write this off as OMGUS because it is anything but. You're getting yourself a bad track record my very oppurtunistic friend
Vote: RossWilliam-
-
RossWilliam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: December 25, 2007
- Location: New Jersey
No....His exact words were
If he agreed with Pooky, he would just say, I agree with Pooky. But he puts in his disclaimer about how he hasn't read everything yet. and he did put the hammer on GS last game after only just replacing into the game. I want to hear everybody's thoughts on that.I've almost finished reading, so until then I'm just going to agree with Pooky.
And I said mith was obviously not scummy because mith's card says Mason on it. I meant he was obviously not scummy now, i had no real opinion of him yesterday except he was a smart player.
and lastly, I am the farthest thing from frantic. It's virtually impossible to be frantic on a forum, and by saying that, you are misrepresenting me. so let's go easy on that.-
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
*damage control* What a lame first day... *damage control*
This is by far the scummiest post of the day so far:
Certainly enough to earn my vote.RossWilliam wrote:he made a lot of contradictions on day one, and he was quoted as saying mith was extremely scummy when mith is, obviously not. same reasons as everyone else.
Vote: RossWilliam
Anyone voting for Sarc is dumb. An FoS i can just about tolerate, because there is no doubt that his play is scummy. Of course, the fact that he is quite obviously the Jester is enough to keep him alive today at least.
Although in fairness, i also totally disagree with AlKo's comments about Sarc, in that, clearly if Sarc is just 'following Pooky' that is as good as voting blindly, unless you are insinuating that he has confirmation of Pooky's innocence/superior intelligence.
Anyway, i'm still fine with a Ross wagon atm.
BMShow2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%-
-
MeMe Post or Perish
- Post or Perish
- Post or Perish
- Posts: 10710
- Joined: October 6, 2002
- Location: Missouri
-
-
Talitha Dr. Dead
- Dr. Dead
- Dr. Dead
- Posts: 4699
- Joined: August 14, 2003
- Location: KOWHAI MALL
-
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
Look on the bright side. At least i dont think you're scum. :pMeMe wrote:vote: Sarcastro
Oh shoot. Now BM thinks I'm dumb.Show2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%-
-
RossWilliam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: December 25, 2007
- Location: New Jersey
and plus, the only words Pooky has said all day other than his vote for me and fis first "good morning" post are "choo choo."
Sarc, where in those two words do you find enough facts to sign your vote on with? Is it the first choo? the second choo? enlighten me please. BM, alko, do you really find him not sketchy at all? Is blatant oppurtunism not a scumtell?-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
My statement about mith is because your post is attacking (at the moment I can't think of who you were attacking) a player for saying mith is scummy, and your reasoning is that mith is obviously not scummy. The only reason you know this is because mith is dead and you know his role. I can elaborate on this if you want, but this makes the logic of casting suspicion for that reasoning faulty.RossWilliam wrote:No....His exact words were
If he agreed with Pooky, he would just say, I agree with Pooky. But he puts in his disclaimer about how he hasn't read everything yet. and he did put the hammer on GS last game after only just replacing into the game. I want to hear everybody's thoughts on that.I've almost finished reading, so until then I'm just going to agree with Pooky.
And I said mith was obviously not scummy because mith's card says Mason on it. I meant he was obviously not scummy now, i had no real opinion of him yesterday except he was a smart player.
and lastly, I am the farthest thing from frantic. It's virtually impossible to be frantic on a forum, and by saying that, you are misrepresenting me. so let's go easy on that.
I am not making any claims on Sarc being town, but I don't agree with your attacks on him.
I'll try to comment on more later when I get time.-
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
Dont be immature. Its obvious that Sarc is acting scummy, but has it never crossed your mind that he could just be the JESTER? lolRossWilliam wrote:and plus, the only words Pooky has said all day other than his vote for me and fis first "good morning" post are "choo choo."
Sarc, where in those two words do you find enough facts to sign your vote on with? Is it the first choo? the second choo? enlighten me please. BM, alko, do you really find him not sketchy at all? Is blatant oppurtunism not a scumtell?
The hammer yesterday pretty much clinched it for me. Of course he is scummy, but that doesnt mean i want to lynch the Jester just yet. :p
It is worrying that you are taking him so seriously...
BMShow2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%-
-
Battle Mage Jester
- Jester
- Jester
- Posts: 22231
- Joined: January 10, 2007
AlKo is spot on here. Mith was as sketchy as hell. Saying that anyone attacking him is suspicious, AFTER HE HAS BEEN NK'D is basically arguing the WIFOM of Night actions.al_kohaulec wrote:
My statement about mith is because your post is attacking (at the moment I can't think of who you were attacking) a player for saying mith is scummy, and your reasoning is that mith is obviously not scummy. The only reason you know this is because mith is dead and you know his role. I can elaborate on this if you want, but this makes the logic of casting suspicion for that reasoning faulty.RossWilliam wrote:No....His exact words were
If he agreed with Pooky, he would just say, I agree with Pooky. But he puts in his disclaimer about how he hasn't read everything yet. and he did put the hammer on GS last game after only just replacing into the game. I want to hear everybody's thoughts on that.I've almost finished reading, so until then I'm just going to agree with Pooky.
And I said mith was obviously not scummy because mith's card says Mason on it. I meant he was obviously not scummy now, i had no real opinion of him yesterday except he was a smart player.
and lastly, I am the farthest thing from frantic. It's virtually impossible to be frantic on a forum, and by saying that, you are misrepresenting me. so let's go easy on that.
BMShow2020 Stats - 31 completed games:
Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4
winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%-
-
RossWilliam Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: December 25, 2007
- Location: New Jersey
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.