PIRATES v. NINJAS! Game Over!

Mgm · Post Post #700 (ISO) » Mon Feb 04, 2008 6:50 pm

cicero wrote:
Erg0 wrote:cicero, I can sympathise as I've been in a similar position in the past - but there's no need to lynch the lurker
immediately
. The first few kills tend to thin them out a bit, and we get much more information from wagonning more active players than pursuing easy lurker lynches.
The time is never right, it seems. Yes... we will get more information now. But we might pay for it dearly later. And lots of info is upcoming anyway, with nightkills, investigations and what not. Which means from a town strategy viewpoint, after a robust day like this, if you can spot someone who is likely not going to become an active contributor and will therefore remain opaque, an excellent strategy would be to wagon and possibly lynch that person.

Ah well. That's my counterpoint to "lynch all lurkers" is dumb. Do with it what you will y'all. You know my feelings.

If we lynch lurkers rather than scummy players, we might not get to an endgame. Being vocal doesn't mean someone should be exempt from getting lynched. Besides, I doubt that in a Stoofer game we will end up with an endgame where people coasted through without posting. They will be replaced before it gets that far.

mikeburnfire · Post Post #701 (ISO) » Mon Feb 04, 2008 7:54 pm

Still here. Still want to participate. Still don't have the force of will to sift through all the posts.

KD has the most votes. I don't care if he is lynched.

Thesp is second. I also do not mind if he is lynched.

Iammars is also second. I don't care here as well.

Guardian is next. I oppose a lynch on Guardian.

Gorrad is tied with Guardian, even though he's a mason. Bravo, guys.

UltimaAvalon · Post Post #702 (ISO) » Mon Feb 04, 2008 8:36 pm

3/5 isnt that bad....

Are we bandwagooning KScope for being Scopey? Cus thats a fun bandwagon right there

Mgm · Post Post #703 (ISO) » Mon Feb 04, 2008 9:53 pm

Votes on Gorrad increase the number of votes required to lynch without actually adding something useful. They should disappear ASAP (read: Right Now)

Mr Stoofer · Post Post #704 (ISO) » Mon Feb 04, 2008 10:45 pm

Vote Count

KaleiÐoscøpe: 5 (Fritzler, Thesp, Twomz, cicero, Thestatusquo)
Guardian: 3 (Erg0, Thok, Mgm)
Thesp: 2 (hasdgfas, Gorrad)
Iammars: 2 (Sir Tornado, Claus)
Gorrad: 2 (Flameaxe, The Fonz)
Twomz: 1 (KaleiÐoscøpe)
cicero: 1 (UltimaAvalon)
Rosso Carne: 1 (Kison)
mikeburnfire: 1 (JordanA24)
JordanA24: 1 (MrBuddyLee)

Not voting: 6 (Skruffs, Rosso Carne, Iammars, mikeburnfire, Samruc, Guardian)

13 to lynch!

Deadline: 9am GMT Monday 11th February.

A reminder of the deadline rule:

[quote][05] At deadline, a person will be lynched if they have a majority of voters voting for them. That means you can be lynched with just one vote if only one person is voting. [/quote]

Currently 19 players are voting, which would mean that (since nobody has 10 votes), nobody would be lynched at deadline.

Mr Stoofer · Post Post #705 (ISO) » Mon Feb 04, 2008 10:47 pm

Flameaxe has been prodded

Claus · Post Post #706 (ISO) » Mon Feb 04, 2008 11:54 pm

Mgm wrote: Also, if you believe scummy lurkers should be lynched, why go after Iammars? He's not the shining example of participation, but there are plenty of people who are worse lurking offenders.

True. I was voting for SirT earlier, but no one seemed to care about him.

As for Iammars, besides being a lurker, he also failed to answer a few simple questions I made to him, and tried to remind him at least twice, I think. While the "He confirmed as a pirate" reason is completely bogus, even for D1, I'm having this impression that he used the bandwagon to gather supporters to him without having to actually play the game or take any instance, and I don't like that.

That said, seeing the last active player other than me leave the Iammars wagon, that vote seems pointless now.

On another note: I expect a lynch within the next 3 days. We don't want to lynch hours before the deadline only to have the target make a believable claim without enough time for an alternative lynch.

True, let's put a "avoid no-lynch vote" on Kscope then:

Unvote. Vote: Kscope

I'll try re-reading him later.

Gorrad · Post Post #707 (ISO) » Tue Feb 05, 2008 12:12 am

mikeburnfire wrote:Gorrad is tied with Guardian, even though he's a mason. Bravo, guys.

This made me lol.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #708 (ISO) » Tue Feb 05, 2008 12:29 am

We still have 6 days, so I see no reasons to change my mind now. Vote is staying.

Mgm · Post Post #709 (ISO) » Tue Feb 05, 2008 12:46 am

[quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"]We still have 6 days, so I see no reasons to change my mind now. Vote is staying.[/quote] We don't have 6 days. We want to have some spare time to make an alternative decision if it is needed. Also, Twomz might not be a mason, but a single vote on him isn't going to ignite a bandwagon in time. At least not soon enough to be in time for the deadline.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #710 (ISO) » Tue Feb 05, 2008 1:11 am

Twomz is a mason since when...?

Twomz · Post Post #711 (ISO) » Tue Feb 05, 2008 2:15 am

"Twomz MIGHT NOT be a mason..."

L2read plz.

Iammars: 2 (Sir Tornado,

Claus

)
Gorrad: 2 (Flameaxe, The Fonz)
Twomz: 1 (KaleiÐoscøpe)
cicero: 1 (UltimaAvalon)
Rosso Carne: 1 (Kison)
mikeburnfire: 1 (JordanA24)
JordanA24: 1 (MrBuddyLee)

If all these people unvote, it will be 6 to lynch.

Fos: Flameaxe and The Fonz

because I agree with MBF.

MrBuddyLee · Post Post #712 (ISO) » Tue Feb 05, 2008 2:19 am

vote: kscope

Play the game.

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #713 (ISO) » Tue Feb 05, 2008 2:27 am

Twomz wrote:"Twomz MIGHT NOT be a mason..."

L2read plz.

I've readed that, but I've not readed where you claimed mason...

vote: kscope
Play the game.

I'm on the playerlist, thus I play the game. Can't help it if my way of playing a game doesn't satisfy the majority of people here.

UltimaAvalon · Post Post #714 (ISO) » Tue Feb 05, 2008 2:54 am

unvote

MrBuddyLee · Post Post #715 (ISO) » Tue Feb 05, 2008 3:45 am

kscope wrote:/confirm

FoS: Mikeburnfire

Liar. I can't recall playing a game with you.

That reminds me... I need a new one Smile

Vote: TSQ

"I get good vibes from thok"
That's usually a scumtell

Unvote Vote: Thok

Unvote Vote: Skruffs

I think the people you named are very well capable of hunting scum, but instead of wasting their time on long and useless posts, they make short ones, so people don't get the idea they're reading an essay made by Hilary Clinton

Meh, this game is going way to fast. Someone mind giving a short summary?

Unvote Vote: Twomz

He strikes me as scummy.

Have you played with Twomz Kscope at all before?

Oh, figured.

Content is overrated. You should vote for the people you consider suspicious.

We still have 6 days, so I see no reasons to change my mind now. Vote is staying.

Twomz is a mason since when...?

I've readed that, but I've not readed where you claimed mason...

I'm on the playerlist, thus I play the game. Can't help it if my way of playing a game doesn't satisfy the majority of people here.

Unimpressive. You have given 0.0 reasoning for your votes and FOSes. You're flippant. You say content is overrated in the same sentence you say we should have some way of finding people suspicious AKA the content they post.

You CAN help it if your way of doing things doesn't satisfy. You can tweak your approach. I hope you take a more proactive approach towards your significant other.

i keed

Skruffs · Post Post #716 (ISO) » Tue Feb 05, 2008 3:56 am

Lol...
Ksc0pe, if you intentionally play in a way "the majority" of players don't like, why am I vote-worthy for saying I don't like how the majority of players scumhunt? It sounds contrived to me.

I think I'm sll waiting on thesp to explain something: I may have missed it though.

hasdgfas · Post Post #717 (ISO) » Tue Feb 05, 2008 3:56 am

Looking at kscope, there's nothing useful there at all.

unvote, vote kscope

Rosso Carne · Post Post #718 (ISO) » Tue Feb 05, 2008 5:14 am

vote scopy

Rosso Carne · Post Post #719 (ISO) » Tue Feb 05, 2008 5:43 am

scopy is kscope for those of you out of the know.

Rosso Carne · Post Post #720 (ISO) » Tue Feb 05, 2008 5:46 am

unvote, vote k-scope

Mr Stoofer · Post Post #721 (ISO) » Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:07 am

Vote Count

KaleiÐoscøpe: 9 (Fritzler, Thesp, Twomz, cicero, Thestatusquo, Claus, MrBuddyLee, hasdgfas, Rosso Carne)
Guardian: 3 (Erg0, Thok, Mgm)
Gorrad: 2 (Flameaxe, The Fonz)
Thesp: 1 (Gorrad)
Iammars: 1 (Sir Tornado)
Twomz: 1 (KaleiÐoscøpe)
Rosso Carne: 1 (Kison)
mikeburnfire: 1 (JordanA24)

Not voting: 6 (Skruffs, Iammars, mikeburnfire, Samruc, Guardian, UltimaAvalon)

13 to lynch!

Deadline: 9am GMT Monday 11th February.

A reminder of the deadline rule:

[quote][05] At deadline, a person will be lynched if they have a majority of voters voting for them. That means you can be lynched with just one vote if only one person is voting. [/quote]

Currently 19 players are voting, which would mean that (since nobody has 10 votes), nobody would be lynched at deadline.

MrBuddyLee · Post Post #722 (ISO) » Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:23 am

unvote

to leave room for a few more rampant bandwagoners to express their sentiments with no accompanying text.

mikeburnfire · Post Post #723 (ISO) » Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:29 am

I support this lynchwagon, but it seems a bit hypocritical of me because I don't feel useful either.

mikeburnfire · Post Post #724 (ISO) » Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:35 am

Also, I read something of Guardian's that confused me.

Again this makes me think we should get a lurker. I (wooh look, diverting attention to the biggest wagon) am beginning to appreciate the wagon on Kscope. I think Iammars is better, but heck, Kscope has a better shot at being scum than me, and his play right now would be GREAT play as scum in the Thok scumhunting world.

Guardian, why do you think Kscop has a better shot at being scum than you? Also, why would his play of active lurking be great? Furthermore, why do you want to go after lurkers?