SensFan (1): Drunken Piper
Holy (1): Skruffs
Not voting (3): mikeburnfire, Holy, SensFan
With 5 alive it is 3 to lynch.
Now I can see why you insist that I may be the SK.Skruffs wrote:Holy's "You caught me!" page one probably isn't much of a scum tell. She was sayiong that Korlash was 'her scum' a few times page four, askign him to help her (lynch his scumbuddy). Could have been an attempt to communicate with mafia.
Post 146: Repeatedly refers to 'the scum' after correcting Phate on the abilities of the SK (Which had been mentioned the day before by someone else)... refers to "him", singularly, which makes me think she was inferring both the SK and that the sk is male... (ignoring Jex as possibility, though it could be a grammar thing)
Page 8, speculating only on what the mafia would do... not the SK... doesn't need to speculate on the SK?
DP was claiming and there's a possibility he was an unpowered-scum trying to benefit from the plan, I was only curious about his true intention behind his action.Skruffs wrote:post 203: fishing for DP's full claim shortly after others start claiming for a volunteer for Phate's disaster of a plan (may be unpowered , and thus hoping to get someone else pushed in front before she gets nommed for it, - points)
Later on saying that 'even she' couldn't be sure someone was scum goes against her claim to be an unpowered townie; it makes me think she considered her position in the game special.
Why not? Claiming was a trend on Day 2, a chance to look dumb and or pro-town.Skruffs wrote:I don't think Sensfan SK would claim being a role opener so early in the day.
Maybe it was an euphoria slip.Skruffs wrote:I doubt sensfan would have suggested a mass claim as SK, so early on day one. Unecessary attention.
I'm sorry too Sir, I admit I was half neglecting the game since Day 2, but I promise it won't ever happen again Sir. Lol.Skruffs wrote:Unvote, Vote : Holy
Sorry miss.
Hm, from my point of view: his first day and today almost similar. He was GUNG HO yesterday, but possibly it was because he was holding a knowledge that the scum possibly possess an RB role etc. Not really sure.Skruffs wrote:MBF's change of character, today, versus yesterday, when the mafia was still alive, is just... it's palpable. Like, I can taste it, on my tongue, the difference. I don't like it.
Is anyone else noticing that?
I have no idea what you mean in this sense. I stated yesterday that I would be happy with a kabenon or Holy lynch, and got a kabenon lynch. Now I'd like a Holy lynch, but instead of just immediately voting her, I gave some time for discussion.Day 2 and Day 3 you were GUNG HO, inquisitive, demanding, agressive, now you are still quasi aggressive but it's more like a badger that's been poked.
What are you talking about? I was eager to lynch Holy yesterday too. This isn't something new and unexplained. I really don't get good vibes from you, Skruffs. Even though I'm fairly certain that Holy is the last killer, your inane theories always keep making me second-guess myself.Your contribution that I remember today was that you would lynch Holy, DP, and then me later on, but I don't remember you explaining why; unlike DP, and now Holy who at least have made SOME contribution.
Skruffs, you kept insisting that the SK was the roleblocker, but the only way you could explain it was if a scumcop declared a guilty on a scumroleswitcher, who in turn declared a guilty on a scumdoctor. You kept repeating it, but it didn't make any sense. DP kept insisting that he thought the SK was roleblocker too. But neither of you ever refuted my points as to why that was illogical.
^ I have explained why your theories are inane today.Why would the scum protect a townie? They want town to die. It would be much smarter for them to NOT protect a townie, or even *GASP* protect themselves from the SK.