VOTE: TranscendIn post 1799, Vedith wrote:Don't go down the road that Trans is and people just go "whatever".In post 1797, Lapsa wrote:Transcend is scum
If Trans is really scum, I can tell you now that we won't be lynching him today from these kind of comments.
Who else is scum?
I prefer not lynching a spot that's replaced out and not filled.In post 1826, FourTrouble wrote:Vedith, why not lynch Theta?
I dont think tunneling is super helpful in general, i think it leads to confirmation bias and someone's reads are only half of what i am looking at anyway. i think it is more useful to pull back a little and try to consider anyone you dont have confirmation on as if their actions are either town or scum. I am not always great with that but i try to keep my ideas more general and not trust other people just because i agree with them on one or two things. its easier said than done.In post 1828, Tchill13 wrote:Loren why do you scum read pisskop? He tunneled me and you scum read me so wouldn't that make him more towny to you?
I'd be OK with lynching why mafia honestly. Like I said as long as it's not my town reads I really don't care. I would like o feel better about lore before lynching whymafia. Assuming we stay away from penguin.
in fact you said this tchillIn post 1703, Tchill13 wrote: Lore's making a ton of sense in his case against me. He's feeling more and more towny. Theta slot or pmysterious are who I'd lynch if it was solely up to me.
I objectIn post 1815, Vedith wrote:Now that's out of the way we should focus on lynching WhyMafia.
Give your objections and say why otherwise get to voting.
I understand your case. I would vote the person the acts the way I did.In post 1821, Vedith wrote:Im not at a PC right now so I'm not quoting however...
WhyMafia lacks any real content or Scum hunting. When I was originally speaking with Pisskop, WhyMafia pinged me as Oppornist for his ridicules vote. Every time WhyMafia speaks about a player being Scum it's more of a question to try an see a general opinion or just very passive.
I have no understanding of what level WhyMafia has with the game and like I just said, he has no content including moving the game forward or resolving.
I'll have to go over the posts with Scum calling or voting which may explain it better.
If you're calling me opportunistic, then my defense of him was anything but that. It would've been ridiculously easy to ignore the wagon. I felt like the wagon was scum driven, and that Transcend didn't deserve a wagonIn post 1824, massive wrote:I also kind of hate his soft-defense of Transcend during the "let's vote Transcend for voting the IC" phase of the early game. He's definitely more invested in defending Transcend than I think even Transcend was.
This is probably a good direction to go if we aren't lynching Tchill.
If it is I think Pisskop is Scum.In post 1844, Gamma Emerald wrote:I have no hard scumreads this game
Thinking this might be multiball based on that
<3In post 1843, Vedith wrote:Btw I appreciate that you are studying and that is why I never commented on your activity.
Because I scum read him, but didnt have time to articulate why. And I didn't see anyone else point it out, so I asked the question. You could've asked why I scum read him. Anyways, I'll post whyIn post 1824, massive wrote:And the "questioning scumread check" is another good one, since he just did it with Texcat:
