Open 61 - Mountainous Multiball (Game Over!) before 551

Phate · Post Post #300 (ISO) » Wed Feb 13, 2008 12:37 pm

@ttt: I haven't. Now you can ask me why I've been on you since around the middle of D1.

timmytuttut31 · Post Post #301 (ISO) » Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:50 pm

Phate wrote:@ttt: I haven't. Now you can ask me why I've been on you since around the middle of D1.

why have you been on my case since around the middle of D1

farside22 · Post Post #302 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:21 am

Well I think Phate needs to answer TTT question and stop dancing around the issue. I'm going to be busy most of today. I'm keeping my word since the deadline is near.

Vote: armlx

OhGodMyLife · Post Post #303 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:51 am

farside22 wrote:Well I think Phate needs to answer TTT question and stop dancing around the issue.

QFT. Phate, maybe you're getting amusement out of toying with him, but what you're doing is pretty much the opposite of constructive.

Adel · Post Post #304 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:43 am

votecount as of post 303

^{with 12 alive, 7 will lynch before deadline}
˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚

armlx¬

: 6 : Greasy Spot, timmytuttut88, Killah Nine, Phate, OhGodMyLife, farside22

oEJo

: 2 : angelmouse, armix

Greasy Spot

: 1 : DoctorJimmy,

timmytuttut88

: 1 : Thorbjorn

not voting

: 2 : oEJo, Rosso Carne

˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚

Day 1's deadline is February 19

farside22 · Post Post #305 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:44 am

My fault I forgot to unvote.

unvote:
vote armix

armlx · Post Post #306 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:51 am

Unvote, Vote armlx

Take that Rosso. Or something. Go town.

Adel · Post Post #307 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2008 11:01 am

armix takes some rope and ties a noose and walks onto the platform under the large tree in the center of the village. "I'm ready to hang scum!" he announces as he slips the rope over his head and around his neck. "Die scum die!" he cries as he jumps off the platform.

armlx, mafia goon, is now hanging from a tree, dead.

mafia submitt your night moves to me by Feb. 18th.

Adel · Post Post #308 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 8:16 am

Phate (townie) and Rosso Carne (townie) have been killed

votecount as of post 307

^{with 9 alive, 5 will lynch before deadline}
˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚

¬No Lynch

:

none

not voting

: angelmouse, DoctorJimmy, farside22, Greasy Spot, Killah Nine, OhGodMyLife, oEJo, Thorbjorn (still waiting for a replacement), timmytuttut88

˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚

^{deadline date = initial date + 3*(number of players)days

= Feb 18 + 3*(9) days

=Feb 18 + 27 days = March 17}

Day 2's deadline is March 17

OhGodMyLife · Post Post #309 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 9:19 am

Vote: oEJo

1. Throws his vote onto developing Rosso Carne bandwagon in post 70 by simply parroting farside's (now confirmed to be) misguided attack. This fact went largely unnoticed at the time because GS wagoned even more obviously with even less of an attempt to explain anything.
2. Questions GS and repeatedly makes comments in the vein of "I want to vote you" and "Its getting very hard not to vote you," but then drops the subject entirely to attack farside.
3. Defends armlx, backtracks, gets into pissing war with armlx over backtracking, claims confusion over case against him, disappears entirely.

Three strikes, you're out.

I see two possibilities for oEJo, either he was trying to derail wagon on partner scumGS, or alternately partner armlx tried to bus him/flailed wildly when it became apparent he was going down.

I also still believe GS to be scum. I could easily get behind lynching him today as well. Consider this an

FoS

.

Finally, take a look at post 285 from DoctorJimmy. If oEJo does not turn out to be armlx's partner I think its seriously likely DJ is. Except for this post I can't even bring to mind any meaningful input from him at all.

FoS: DoctorJimmy

.

OhGodMyLife · Post Post #310 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 9:21 am

EBWOP:

Forgot to add that I disagree with Rosso's theory of an armlx/GS scumpair, there was too much antagonism between them too early for the late turnaround on armlx's part to be an attempt at defending a scum partner. I also prefer trying to find and lynch armlx's partner today to lynching GS because it would be in our best interest to eliminate one scum group (and their night kill) entirely.

Adel · Post Post #311 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 10:47 am

btw, since I'm having trouble finding a replacement for Thorbjorn, feel free to PM any other player to invite them to join us by PMing me.

farside22 · Post Post #312 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 12:32 pm

I agree with OMGL. oEJo seemed to jump at the chance to help armix in lynching someone else. Then did that oh I made a mistake thing just doesn't fly with me at all. I think he realized he got caught and now was trying to look town after.

Vote: oEJo

oEJo · Post Post #313 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 1:16 pm

You think I'm scumbuddies with Greasy Spot? Why lynch me over him?

OhGodMyLife · Post Post #314 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 1:25 pm

I think you could be partners with GS, but more importantly I also think you're the most likely of anyone to be armlx's scumpartner. This I have already said quite plainly above. Please note also where I say lynching armlx's partner is the best case scenario for today. I have made this my primary goal.

I hope everybody sees that this was not a defense by oEJo, but a deflection.

oEJo · Post Post #315 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 1:39 pm

I should have noted that I'm not in the right atmosphere at the moment for a decent defence. (In class)

Give me a little time please.

DoctorJimmy · Post Post #316 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 2:14 pm

armlx being scum lends weight to both the GS-scum and EJ-scum cases, I'd say. I disagree with OGML about the likliness of a GS/armlx scumpair. Looking back, I really don't see that much antagonism between the two of them, apart from the silly argue-about-the-setup exchange.

Vote: Greasy Spot
FoS: oEJo

One of them is probably armlx's partner.

OhGodMyLife · Post Post #317 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 2:22 pm

DoctorJimmy wrote:armlx being scum lends weight to both the GS-scum and EJ-scum cases, I'd say. I disagree with OGML about the likliness of a GS/armlx scumpair. Looking back, I really don't see that much antagonism between the two of them, apart from the silly argue-about-the-setup exchange.

Vote: Greasy Spot
FoS: oEJo

One of them is probably armlx's partner.

You don't see them jumping on each other's growing bandwagons as antagonism? No comment about my suspicion of

you

?

DoctorJimmy · Post Post #318 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 2:35 pm

There really wasn't much to comment on. You said "look at this post, I suspect he might be armlx's scumpartner" without really elaborating, in which I didn't see any actual argument to comment on or defend myself against. You also pointed out that I didn't contribute much day 1, which sadly I can't disagree with.

Jumping on each other's bandwagons is antagonism, but I see it as potential bussing antagonism and not "too real to be scumpartners" antagonism.

OhGodMyLife · Post Post #319 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 2:45 pm

Go back and look at the situation, in particular armlx jumping on GS's wagon. This event was THE spark that ignited suspicion of armlx on my part, and I'm the one who championed his lynch all day yesterday. The lynch of GS at that point was in no way inevitable, so armlx didn't need to be bussing. I find it much more plausible that he looked at that and went "hey easy lynch," not knowing whether GS was town or rival scum group.

timmytuttut31 · Post Post #320 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 3:15 pm

vote:oEJo

hes more scum then GS

oEJo · Post Post #321 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:34 pm

Vote: timmytuttut88

Call this OMGUS, but that vote was EXTREMELY scummy, regardless of my alignment.

You put a L-2 vote on me, with considerably less explanation
a) than needed
b) than the first two votes on my wagon.

OhGodMyLife · Post Post #322 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:43 pm

oEJo wrote:
Vote: timmytuttut88

Call this OMGUS, but that vote was EXTREMELY scummy, regardless of my alignment.

You put a L-2 vote on me, with considerably less explanation
a) than needed
b) than the first two votes on my wagon.

I hope you've got something better than that coming, oEJo, because this is yet another deflection. All you've done is say "Wait guys! Lynch someone other than me!" twice now.

L-2 is not going to get you quicklynched. And I'm sorry, but saying something is scummy "regardless of my alignment" is really scummy in its own right. Yeah his vote needed more explanation, but this offense is the best defense thing is not flying right now. You're making yourself look worse and worse.

timmytuttut31 · Post Post #323 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 5:14 pm

well I think that there is a chance armLx was right and GS was just a confused newbie. I think the greater chance of scum lies with oEJo because of his earlier comments with armlx.

angelmouse · Post Post #324 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 9:50 pm

Since armlx is scum then i truely belive OEJo is as well. I agree with OMGML completely with every point he said. I pointed out on day one about OEJo's backtracking very early on and he ignored me until others picked up on it.

I am debating putting him on L-1 but seeing as we are only just into day 2 i don't think it is wise

SERIOUS FOS: oEJo

and if you give me no reason to to vote you then i will put the vote on. You linked yourself with armlx then backtracked, not a "mistake", just bad play.

Not sure about Spot, armlx defence of him could be a cover so we lynch him next or it could have been defence.