PIRATES v. NINJAS! Game Over!


User avatar
The Fonz
The Fonz
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
The Fonz
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9014
Joined: April 2, 2007
Location: UK

Post Post #1175 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 11:38 am

Post by The Fonz »

Gorrad wrote:
Erg0 wrote:Stoofer likes LotR? I dunno, Sonny Chiba got bumped to the bottom too.

I'm also noticing that, judging by the kills so far, it appears that every single player in this game is either scum or a power role.
I saw that too. Makes a cetain amount of sense, given the flavor, but I wouldn't be surprised if there wasn't an Ultimate-Showdown-of-Ultimate-Destiny-style vanilla bystander.
Mr Stoofer wrote: There is at least one Townie in this game. The Townie Role PM looks like this:
[Character Name] (Townie)


You are a good guy and win when all the bad guys are dead.
Quote tag fixed -- Stoofer

Congratulations Erg0. We know from the first page that there is at least one vanilla townie in the game, and we now know from your comment that you aren't one of them. If you're not scum, please pull your head out of your ass and stop giving scum information it's better they lack.
User avatar
Erg0
Erg0
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Erg0
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4157
Joined: February 25, 2007
Location: Secret Aussie.

Post Post #1176 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 11:44 am

Post by Erg0 »

Hence the reason that I included the phrase "judging by the kills so far" in my original statement.
"You were doing well until everyone died."
V/LA most weekends.
User avatar
The Fonz
The Fonz
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
The Fonz
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9014
Joined: April 2, 2007
Location: UK

Post Post #1177 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 11:51 am

Post by The Fonz »

True, but I don't think that kind of disclaimer works. I don't think I've ever seen a vanilla townie speculate that a game might not have any, with or without caveats.
User avatar
UltimaAvalon
UltimaAvalon
Vote: UltimaAvalon
User avatar
User avatar
UltimaAvalon
Vote: UltimaAvalon
Vote: UltimaAvalon
Posts: 1239
Joined: March 22, 2007
Location: Texas

Post Post #1178 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 12:02 pm

Post by UltimaAvalon »

The Fonz wrote:
Mr Stoofer wrote: There is at least one Townie in this game. The Townie Role PM looks like this:
[Character Name] (Townie)


You are a good guy and win when all the bad guys are dead.
Congratulations Erg0. We know from the first page that there is at least one vanilla townie in the game, and we now know from your comment that you aren't one of them. If you're not scum, please pull your head out of your ass and stop giving scum information it's better they lack.
It says Townie. Not Vanilla Townie.
AlyG: If he's not a joke account then what is he? He starts bandwagons on himself and insults other people.
User avatar
Gorrad
Gorrad
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Gorrad
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4578
Joined: April 30, 2007
Location: Land of Dungeons and Stairs

Post Post #1179 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 12:18 pm

Post by Gorrad »

We're wasting time with this. Erg0 is trying to distract us. Let's go ahead and lynch Thesp, the last Goblin will off Erg0, and, with luck, Skruffs will die some way or another soon.
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
User avatar
Skruffs
Skruffs
Pantsman
User avatar
User avatar
Skruffs
Pantsman
Pantsman
Posts: 6341
Joined: July 25, 2005
Location: Tower of Babel

Post Post #1180 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 1:49 pm

Post by Skruffs »

The Fonz wrote: If you're not scum, please pull your head out of your ass and stop giving scum information it's better they lack.
This sentence works if you replace all instances of "Scum" with "Town", too.
FOS

UltimaAvalon wrote:It says Townie. Not Vanilla Townie.
UA to the rescue!
FOS

Gorrad wrote:We're wasting time with this. Erg0 is trying to distract us. Let's go ahead and lynch Thesp, the last Goblin will off Erg0, and,
with luck, Skruffs will die some way or another soon.
Double play! Distract from Erg0's 'slip' and try to direct competing scum groups as well!
DOUBLE fos!
User avatar
Flameaxe
Flameaxe
Comma Police
User avatar
User avatar
Flameaxe
Comma Police
Comma Police
Posts: 6642
Joined: July 9, 2007
Location: Denver

Post Post #1181 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 1:54 pm

Post by Flameaxe »

FoS Skruffs for FoSing people.
FoS Skruffs for Double FoSing, when it was clearly not called for.
Defined by who I dislike, not who I like~
User avatar
Gorrad
Gorrad
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Gorrad
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4578
Joined: April 30, 2007
Location: Land of Dungeons and Stairs

Post Post #1182 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 2:01 pm

Post by Gorrad »

I want no one to respond to this post except Skruffs.

Skruffs, in 1144 you gave me a "big finger of suspicion", and now you give me a "DOUBLE fos". Why don't you put your money where your mouth is and vote me?
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
User avatar
Claus
Claus
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Claus
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1734
Joined: June 1, 2007
Location: Tsukuba

Post Post #1183 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 2:12 pm

Post by Claus »

Skruffs wrote:
Gorrad wrote:We're wasting time with this. Erg0 is trying to distract us. Let's go ahead and lynch Thesp, the last Goblin will off Erg0, and,
with luck, Skruffs will die some way or another soon.
Double play! Distract from Erg0's 'slip' and try to direct competing scum groups as well!
DOUBLE fos!
Gorrad is a claimed mason, and his partner died.

Just saying.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVVmAG0RXmo
User avatar
Skruffs
Skruffs
Pantsman
User avatar
User avatar
Skruffs
Pantsman
Pantsman
Posts: 6341
Joined: July 25, 2005
Location: Tower of Babel

Post Post #1184 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 2:18 pm

Post by Skruffs »

I can fos anyone I want, Claus.
I realize
that in the heat of the moment, I forgot that he was the other mason. My fos wasn't based on that.
However.
Regardless of if he is confirmed, It's really scummy to be trying to tell people to kill me, considering I don't remember him actually saying he thought I was scum earlier in the game.

Gorrad: Why would I vote you? I am happy with my fingers.

FlameAxe: Fos's noted.
User avatar
Flameaxe
Flameaxe
Comma Police
User avatar
User avatar
Flameaxe
Comma Police
Comma Police
Posts: 6642
Joined: July 9, 2007
Location: Denver

Post Post #1185 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 2:21 pm

Post by Flameaxe »

Skruffs wrote:I can fos anyone I want, Claus.
I realize
that in the heat of the moment, I forgot that he was the other mason. My fos wasn't based on that.
However.
Regardless of if he is confirmed, It's really scummy to be trying to tell people to kill me, considering I don't remember him actually saying he thought I was scum earlier in the game.

Gorrad: Why would I vote you? I am happy with my fingers.

FlameAxe: Fos's noted.
Yay I got noted!
Defined by who I dislike, not who I like~
User avatar
Gorrad
Gorrad
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Gorrad
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4578
Joined: April 30, 2007
Location: Land of Dungeons and Stairs

Post Post #1186 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 3:07 pm

Post by Gorrad »

Claus wrote:
Skruffs wrote:
Gorrad wrote:We're wasting time with this. Erg0 is trying to distract us. Let's go ahead and lynch Thesp, the last Goblin will off Erg0, and,
with luck, Skruffs will die some way or another soon.
Double play! Distract from Erg0's 'slip' and try to direct competing scum groups as well!
DOUBLE fos!
Gorrad is a claimed mason, and his partner died.

Just saying.
ARGH! I was trying to get him to admit he forgot, hence why I'm still alive d3.

Also:
Skruffs wrote:Regardless of if he is confirmed, It's really scummy to be trying to tell people to kill me, considering I don't remember him actually saying he thought I was scum earlier in the game.
Ah, I didn't? Sorry 'bout that.

I think Skruffs is scum.

Sorry 'bout that.

For those wondering, reread all his d3 posts. HUGE scum vibes from all of them.
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
User avatar
ooba
ooba
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
ooba
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5616
Joined: September 14, 2007
Location: Outpost 31

Post Post #1187 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 3:08 pm

Post by ooba »

Erg0 wrote:1. There would only be a 50% chance of him guessing the right scumgroup (pirates) if he had information based on goblin kills.

2. You're assuming that he has the information to give out in the first place.
First of all , Guardian did have information to give out since ...

Goblin Kills
1.MrBuddyLee - Luke Skywalker (Vig) - throat slit and beaten to death
2.???
3.Thok - Gandalf (Goblin Protector) - arm cleanly sliced off and skulled bashed

Goblin kill on Night 2 was missed.

And i do not understand the 50% thing , in the end Guardian only said you were 100% scum - not pirate or ninja. He made up that entire tracker story (Erg0 visitied hasdgfas - hence pirate scum) to out you as scum with his false claim of 'tracker'.
User avatar
Erg0
Erg0
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Erg0
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4157
Joined: February 25, 2007
Location: Secret Aussie.

Post Post #1188 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 3:26 pm

Post by Erg0 »

1. You appear to know too much. A scum crosskill is one possible explanation for the lack of goblin kill, but it's certainly not the
only
explanation. Doctor protection or a roleblocker are equally plausible explanations, and in those scenarios Guardian would not know the reason that the goblins' target didn't die. For that matter, you're assuming that the goblins tried to kill me in the first place, which is not a given by any means.

2. I'm talking about Guardian's choice to try and pin hasdgfas' death on me. By claiming that he'd tracked me to hasdgfas, he was pegging his claim on me being a pirate (since hasdgfas died with pirate flavour), and at best he would have a 50% chance of being right about that. I don't think he thought his claim would work, he was just rolling the dice and hoping to get a townie bumped off before he was lynched.
"You were doing well until everyone died."
V/LA most weekends.
User avatar
ooba
ooba
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
ooba
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5616
Joined: September 14, 2007
Location: Outpost 31

Post Post #1189 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 3:30 pm

Post by ooba »

Erg0 wrote:1. You appear to know too much. A scum crosskill is one possible explanation for the lack of goblin kill, but it's certainly not the only explanation. Doctor protection or a roleblocker are equally plausible explanations, and in those scenarios Guardian would not know the reason that the goblins' target didn't die. For that matter, you're assuming that the goblins tried to kill me in the first place, which is not a given by any means.
I've Already commented on that possibility ...
ooba wrote:
thok wrote:The Fonz and Erg0 both seem protown for me, although a lot of that is from the fairly consistent play I see from both of them
I'm pretty certain Guardian was telling the truth yesterday about Erg0. But i can see a thok protector choosing to protect Erg0 on Night 2 - the kill would have failed even then.
But lets think this out from Guardian's perspective - He is going to be lynched. And we know Goblins didn't kill Night 2. So when he self hammers and gives out info , why would he lie about who he targeted Night 2? After all , taking out another scum is far more valuable to him than taking out a townie ..
User avatar
Skruffs
Skruffs
Pantsman
User avatar
User avatar
Skruffs
Pantsman
Pantsman
Posts: 6341
Joined: July 25, 2005
Location: Tower of Babel

Post Post #1190 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 3:36 pm

Post by Skruffs »

You mean the whole 'suspicion of Guardian' and the speculation about what a 'goblin' was, Gorrad?

Seriously, throw me a frickin' bone here.

Guardian *believed* that Erg0 was scum; wether Thok protected Erg0 or not (It seems likely he might have) shouldn't factor into Guardian's belief that Erg0, and thok by extension, are scum in his eyes.
User avatar
Erg0
Erg0
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Erg0
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4157
Joined: February 25, 2007
Location: Secret Aussie.

Post Post #1191 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 3:50 pm

Post by Erg0 »

ooba wrote:But lets think this out from Guardian's perspective - He is going to be lynched. And we know Goblins didn't kill Night 2. So when he self hammers and gives out info , why would he lie about who he targeted Night 2?
Quote tag fixed -- Stoofer

You're reading, but you're not comprehending. Once again, you are assuming that he had information to give. If the goblin kill was blocked by a doc then he knew
nothing
, thus your line of reasoning is invalid.
After all , taking out another scum is far more valuable to him than taking out a townie ..
Taking out scum may be more valuable than taking out a townie, but if you can't take out a scum then a townie will have to do. Also, I'd be cautious of making value judgements such as this (and your suggestion that we'd be better off if I was nightkilled) without having all of the facts in your possession. Guardian wanted me dead because it would be good for his team, and you seem to want me dead because it saves you the trouble of working things out for yourself.
"You were doing well until everyone died."
V/LA most weekends.
User avatar
Gorrad
Gorrad
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Gorrad
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4578
Joined: April 30, 2007
Location: Land of Dungeons and Stairs

Post Post #1192 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 3:55 pm

Post by Gorrad »

No, Skruffs, that was yesterday, D2. Today is D3.

And Erg0 is correct. We have no way of knowing if Guardian was telling the truth or not. If the goblins really did target Erg0 one day, they can bloody well do it again. Today's lynch is Thesp.
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
User avatar
Skruffs
Skruffs
Pantsman
User avatar
User avatar
Skruffs
Pantsman
Pantsman
Posts: 6341
Joined: July 25, 2005
Location: Tower of Babel

Post Post #1193 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:00 pm

Post by Skruffs »

oh.

Well now it all makes so much more sense, now, then, doesn't it?
Thanks.
User avatar
Gorrad
Gorrad
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Gorrad
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4578
Joined: April 30, 2007
Location: Land of Dungeons and Stairs

Post Post #1194 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:03 pm

Post by Gorrad »

Skruffs wrote:oh.

Well now it all makes so much more sense, now, then, doesn't it?
Thanks.
You're very welcome.
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
User avatar
Flameaxe
Flameaxe
Comma Police
User avatar
User avatar
Flameaxe
Comma Police
Comma Police
Posts: 6642
Joined: July 9, 2007
Location: Denver

Post Post #1195 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:05 pm

Post by Flameaxe »

Hi.
Defined by who I dislike, not who I like~
User avatar
Gorrad
Gorrad
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Gorrad
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4578
Joined: April 30, 2007
Location: Land of Dungeons and Stairs

Post Post #1196 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:08 pm

Post by Gorrad »

Hello, Flameaxe. How are you? Do you feel like giving any thoughts, or are you just here to greet us?
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
User avatar
cicero
cicero
Oratoreador
User avatar
User avatar
cicero
Oratoreador
Oratoreador
Posts: 3328
Joined: July 27, 2007
Location: Toronto

Post Post #1197 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:54 pm

Post by cicero »

Erg0 wrote:1. You appear to know too much. A scum crosskill is one possible explanation for the lack of goblin kill, but it's certainly not the
only
explanation. Doctor protection or a roleblocker are equally plausible explanations, and in those scenarios Guardian would not know the reason that the goblins' target didn't die. For that matter, you're assuming that the goblins tried to kill me in the first place, which is not a given by any means.
Quote tag fixed -- Stoofer

equally
plausible?

Come now.
User avatar
Erg0
Erg0
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Erg0
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4157
Joined: February 25, 2007
Location: Secret Aussie.

Post Post #1198 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 5:12 pm

Post by Erg0 »

I fail to see the problem with that statement. Do you consider a doctor blocking a scum kill to be implausible? Just because we have a special rule in this game, you shouldn't try to attribute every non-kill to that rule.
"You were doing well until everyone died."
V/LA most weekends.
User avatar
Twomz
Twomz
Cliqued On
User avatar
User avatar
Twomz
Cliqued On
Cliqued On
Posts: 2981
Joined: November 21, 2005
Location: Texas

Post Post #1199 (ISO) » Mon Feb 18, 2008 5:16 pm

Post by Twomz »

unvote


We do know one thing, Ergo probably isn't a Goblin and he was most likely the goblin's night target. But I agree that we should let the Goblin's kill him if they want.

So Thesp is probably a ninja? I can believe that, but what if Mgm just had a feeling about him and figured he would be lynched soon so he didn't target him?
"It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith

Return to “Completed Large Theme Games”