No Lynch (4): Sephiroth, Atticus, Mizzy, Flameaxe
not voting (2): -TinVision-, Shanba
Four to lynch.
It is now Night Four. Choices due by 10 PM EST (GMT-5) Wednesday.
So, voting with no case whatsoever? Just wanting the game to be over or wanting to win?Sephiroth wrote:vote: mizzy
can we just get this over with now?
Except I had one vote on me already, and didn't get quicklynched. Which means unless someone is LoA, then Seph IS scum.Shanba wrote:um, spree of quick votes = bad? If either mizzy and seph or mizzy and tin are town, then scum can quicklynch.
Heck, even flameaxe didn't vote straight out of the box, and he's been gunning for mizzy all game. Sephiroth, what are you trying to do? Mizzy, do you think votinganotherplayer really is a good move? From your perspective, unless the scum team is tin and seph, town is screwed.
Pretty sure isn't good enough. I'm positive that Tin is scum and 99% positive that you are, too.Sephiroth wrote:pretty sure mizzy is scum now.
Or it fits just as well the other way around. You vote me, hoping Flame will be his good ole Flamey self and TV hammers.Sephiroth wrote:its actually more likely that one scum is lurking and the other doesnt dare attempt a lynch without him. Which is more consistent with you being scum with TV.
Except here's the thing...both Shanba and I were pretty loud voices in the kab wagon, that lead to his lynch. The only reason you voted him was because Dean got a guilty read on him and you HAD to follow along (post 877). The entire Seph <--> Kab bitch exchange in the beginning could have been, and most likely was, bussing.Sephiroth wrote:ok. so we've established that one of us has to be scum. That person is you, which is why I voted at the beginning of the day.
Oh, but on the contrary, neither Shanba or I lead the wagons. It lead itself.Sephiroth wrote:The fact that I disagree with someone? Thats ridiculous.
And which is more likely to be a bus, the person that leads the wagon on purpose, or the person that goes with a cop investigation? It seems to me that its a better bus if its planned, which makes it more likely you were the one who bussed, not me.
Yap away all you like, but we have two scum still alive, and you're ignoring my points against Tin completely. I'd like to see you respond to them. Do you or do you not think that an active-lurker who picks up prods by PM and doesn't post in thread is scummy? Why or why not?Sephiroth wrote:Ok Mizzy. Leading the wagon is SO different from being loud voices in it.
As for my vote, its a double edged sword. If I'm scum you're safe, if you're scum you're safe from the quicklynch too. A lack of quicklynch proves nothing.
Both scum have to die for a town win. Considering that both you and I think that Tin is most likely scum, why not go for him, instead? What makes a fully active player a better lynch than an active-lurker?Sephiroth wrote:I think that while an active lurker is scummy, it is better to attack their partner who is active. Thats what I'm doing, unfortunately its hard for you to do that, being the partner and all.
Tin is currently posting in other forums/games, including a couple posts madeShanba wrote:Hum. If tin is town, we're at an impasse, as we can't lynch scum without his vote. So we either need a replacement or we're forced to lynch him anyway, which sucks, because I'm not certain he's scum.
This quote makes ridiculous amounts of un-sense. The person you voted without any real preface is the only person who's up in the air as to alignment? You've pigeon-holed everyone else except yourself there. If there's a chance I'm not scum, who else could be, in your mind?Mizzy wrote: Unvote just to be sure, but I think this pretty much proves who is so in a few cases.
Shanba = town, Seph = scum, Flame = town, and the only one who is up in the air even the slighest is Tin, who I think is our second scum.