I must apologize for my rather degenerative posting about wanting to kill everyone but I thought I would throw in some slightly strange remarks as scum bait to see who picked it up. I also threw some in post 225 ("Honestly if I had a no vote cast and anyone was at 3 votes then I would hammer just to get to day two.")
As I see it scum are looking harder than anyone else to find reasons to throw suspicion on townies (as they want to look genuine when they do) a sort of treasure hunt if you like, when something is found they get excited and think how can I use this to my evil advantage. Note: Qx and roland both picked it up (3 others all overlooked it) even though I had no votes and didn't even register on anyones list.
I belive we are at the most crucial point of the game so far (deciding on the lynch for day one) and roland has avoided posting comments even after each top three suspect gave a defence and only posted when proded. (Don't mention claus his last game post was in this one and he is away in Hawaii for vacation).
rolandgarros wrote:all your loudness and pity arguments that don't say anything mean absolutely nothing to me, as they convey absolutely no info, or at least less than what you are making it out to be.
This in response to a vote.........one vote.
roandgarros wrote:The motives behind certain actions, however, are very interesting.
Yes indeed they are.
Qx the scum buddy (of roland), who as I see it has been creating a buddy relationship with claus (thanks to the initial suspicions of chickenfish) with comments like:
Quitex wrote:You have misrepresented myself and Claus fully. But I wont talk about Claus, he should be independent enugh to cover his back.
Quitex wrote:Nice to see you back Claus. Can't wait for yer long post. How was yer trip?
Quitex wrote:But if Claus is scum? Let me tell you that the most pro-town player in this game has been Claus, mostly because he's one of the ICs but I guess his pro-townish behavior is very natural and not intnetional (intentional as "I'm scum! I must act pro-townish")
Quitex wrote:Can we get a Prod on Claus?
All this I see as a ruse to try and reinforce chickenfishs already well voiced theory, as this started around the time Qx became a top lynch candidate. If we lynched Qx then going back over his posts he left these gems for us to suspect claus as his scum partner not roland.
Looking back over Qxs posts I stumbled across this which made me laugh a great deal
Quitex wrote:If you're really concerned about winning this game we should vote as a whole,
Quitex wrote:Vote: Sonic.
Reason: Team work, lynching a scum.
Seems that voting as a whole/team work would be very bad for you right now.
Now the references between roland and Qx are there but sometimes rather subtle so heres a list of em:
Quitex wrote:People I have NO idea about.
Roland. I know your style, kid. I know you're a silent killer. But, I have to give you the benefit of the doubt now. This is a new game and I guess you could have changed.
Quitex wrote:but we could use some little bit more participation from roland and batt, even though I know roland's style is to remail quiet unless something is very very itchy or unless something must been told.
Quitex wrote:Roland is ok. I know his gamestyle and I know he is town. If he does not get lynched/killed, he will give an amazing day 2.
Quitex wrote:Let me add some points:
Claus told that one clear scumtell from myself is to tell that I think that Roland is town. Well, I really think he is town. Reasons? Maybe not as active as we would want to, but when he comes he makes good questions and give acceptable answers. Also he questions what he does not like. Any more townish than that? No bluff posts, no OMGUSing, no WIFOM posts....
rolandgarros wrote:With regards to quitex's last vote, looking back on the points he made as well as the points others have made and my own conclusion, I think that his move is quite aggressive, but we can probably get results from it.
rolandgarros wrote:Its quite a double standard. With the discussion that's gone on since QX's last post, his gambit has quite in fact canceled itself out. Someone mentioned that by stating that possibility in 3c, then the no one will hammer, and I do think that is quite a valid point. The flaw that I saw is only one flaw I saw at the time, and for the most part I think his gambit is basically invalidated. With that, I don't think that Quitex is surely scum enough to warrant a vote, but he is up there on my list of consideration.
rolandgarros wrote:Yes, vampire, and the fact that Quitex unvoted effectively nullifies the gambit. However, we can make a judgment from this unvoting.
rolandgarros wrote:Roland's Long Awaited List of Suspicion
1. CF
2. Quitex (in a close 2nd)
3. Sonic
rolandgarros wrote:Quitex's first gambit is null-and-void, and I don't think it should be brought up for discussion again, as look where its brought us. Absolutely nowhere. Nothing but emotion and facetious remarks. As for my final opinion on it, I do not see his move as pro-town or anti-town. It was neither. It had a flaw that he clearly stated himself, therefore the gambit canceled itself out. It helps neither town nor scum.
rolandgarros wrote:As for why CF beats out QX, but only barely, in my list, CF just seems very cloudy in his posts, more so than QX. His posts have a lot of words, but ultimately mean nothing. He says a lot trying to defend himself, but its not convincing me at all. To me he seems to try pretty hard to get the suspicion off of himself, even more so than QX.
rolandgarros wrote:Quitex that's not helping your case at all. All has not been told, all you've said so far is quite useless because it is nothing but emotion and a response to CF's emotion. It doesn't tell us anything. All I'm asking for is one clear post defending your position. Its up to you to figure out what you're defending yourself from.
So have a read and have a think about all this guys.
Im still happy to lynch Qx and bring down the hammer but for now I will wait for responses.