Cultafia: Game over

Guardian · Post Post #75 (ISO) » Mon Mar 10, 2008 10:33 am

Vote Count 3

Blazerunner [4] (the silent speaker, Yosarian2, Greggo, armlx)
mnowax [2] (curiouskarmadog, springlullaby)
the silent speaker [2] (vikingfan, Blazerunner)
Greggo [1] (ZaneWasHere)
armlx [1] (malthusis)

Not Voting [5]: mnowax, mypenguinkat, Occult, Ration, stark

Guardian · Post Post #76 (ISO) » Mon Mar 10, 2008 10:35 am

mypenguinkat, Ration, stark are being prodded.

Blazerunner · Post Post #77 (ISO) » Mon Mar 10, 2008 11:28 am

I would like people to post more. Aside from the 4 voting me, on a quick look over the post since Occult's post # 34, I did only see 3 posts from vikingfan an that one from mnowar suggesting lurking. I would like to see the opinion of other people over my case.

It has ocurred me that we might easily have up to 5 players against the town (2 recruiters, 2 cultists, a SK). So, if all the 4 voting me are town, I might be closer to a hammer than I was thinking.

Speaking about hammer, I have a question to mod: How long will twilight last, from the hammer to the death, when the person lynched cant speak anymore? (not exactly, just an estimation). I need to know this in case I get hammered, and for the reason above, and even regardless of people's alignment (the people not posting might all agree Im scum and vote me in quick succession)

mnowax · Post Post #78 (ISO) » Mon Mar 10, 2008 12:02 pm

Is there a reason why you killed dripping goofball?

Vote: Bladerunner

Yosarian2 · Post Post #79 (ISO) » Mon Mar 10, 2008 12:12 pm

mnowax wrote:Is there a reason why you killed dripping goofball?

Vote: Bladerunner

Uh...what?

There's like a 95% chance that DG was killed by either a SK or a vig or both (it's theoretically both cults tried to recruit her, but I doubt it, and it's even less likely a cult recruiter chose to kill rather then recruit night 1). Are you accusing him of being a SK? Even if he was, do you think it'd even be a good idea to lynch a SK here? I'm confused.

Blazerunner · Post Post #80 (ISO) » Mon Mar 10, 2008 12:33 pm

mnowax wrote:Is there a reason why you killed dripping goofball?

Vote: Bladerunner

Where did you get this idea, that I killed dripping?

And BTW, correct that vote on me, its bla

z

erunner

vikingfan · Post Post #81 (ISO) » Mon Mar 10, 2008 12:44 pm

what on earth are you talking about, mnowax? what you said makes NO sense...seems like someone too eager to kill off blaze. explain, please.

armlx · Post Post #82 (ISO) » Mon Mar 10, 2008 2:12 pm

I do believe we have our first claim? Vote stands.

Yosarian2 · Post Post #83 (ISO) » Mon Mar 10, 2008 2:15 pm

armlx wrote:I do believe we have our first claim?

We do?

Blazerunner · Post Post #84 (ISO) » Mon Mar 10, 2008 2:17 pm

armlx wrote:I do believe we have our first claim? Vote stands.

We do?

Blazerunner · Post Post #85 (ISO) » Mon Mar 10, 2008 2:17 pm

Yosarian2 wrote:
armlx wrote:I do believe we have our first claim?
We do?

LMFAO

armlx · Post Post #86 (ISO) » Mon Mar 10, 2008 2:31 pm

mnowax wrote:Is there a reason why you killed dripping goofball?

Vote: Bladerunner

I'm taking this as a claim.

Blazerunner · Post Post #87 (ISO) » Mon Mar 10, 2008 2:38 pm

armlx wrote:
mnowax wrote:Is there a reason why you killed dripping goofball?

Vote: Bladerunner
I'm taking this as a claim.

A claim for what? I dont know if you are being somehow ironical, or I just cant reach what you are saying...

malthusis · Post Post #88 (ISO) » Mon Mar 10, 2008 2:46 pm

If you aren't taking this sarcastically and really don't have a clue, we think you're a SK.

For obvious reasons

unvote Vote:Blazerunner

Occult · Post Post #89 (ISO) » Mon Mar 10, 2008 3:07 pm

can I see some goddamn reasons for voting Blaze? Just voting is not helpful to town....

Yosarian2 · Post Post #90 (ISO) » Mon Mar 10, 2008 3:11 pm

unvote

until someoen explains to me what the hell is going on here...

armlx · Post Post #91 (ISO) » Mon Mar 10, 2008 3:32 pm

Norinel wrote:
Watcher

You are a Watcher. Each night, you may watch one other player; I will inform you of who, if anyone, targets them with any night actions.

You win when any threats to the town are eliminated, or if you join a cult before its takeover is inevitable.

armlx · Post Post #92 (ISO) » Mon Mar 10, 2008 3:33 pm

EBWOD: (Assuming thats what mnowax means. No one lynch Blaze till mnowaz comes back to confirm, fyi.)

vikingfan · Post Post #93 (ISO) » Mon Mar 10, 2008 3:36 pm

armlx, the OP says that the SK is completely immune to investigations. Now, he could be insinuating that blazerunner is the cult leader (which would make mnowax a cop), but that doesn't explain the question about killing DGB.

armlx · Post Post #94 (ISO) » Mon Mar 10, 2008 3:46 pm

Watchers aren't investigative roles. I've never seen them classified as one. Information roles sure, but not investigations.

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #95 (ISO) » Mon Mar 10, 2008 3:49 pm

mnowax wrote:Is there a reason why you killed dripping goofball?

Vote: Bladerunner

still good with my vote.

I dont see this as a claim, I see this as a reasonless point to BW...Mnowax, is this a claim?

mnowax · Post Post #96 (ISO) » Mon Mar 10, 2008 4:00 pm

Lets just say Blaze slipped and said something that confrimed something. I can not say why, but, or how i know, but he is not beneficial to the town.

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #97 (ISO) » Mon Mar 10, 2008 4:02 pm

Mnowax, let me ask you think, if we lynch Blaze and he turns town, is there anyway you can wiggle out of your "confirmed something"?...

mnowax · Post Post #98 (ISO) » Mon Mar 10, 2008 4:11 pm

no there is not. If the came upon this information he let go by accident, then i have also opened myself wide open.

vikingfan · Post Post #99 (ISO) » Mon Mar 10, 2008 4:23 pm

that's good enough for me.

unvote vote blazerunner

.