Large Normal 208 - Fireworks Festival [End]

[Nero Cain]

They towntold really hard.

you know that guy that scumtold and flipped town?

It's almost like towntells and scumtells aren't going to be very reliable. Also towntelling as scum is a part of a Maths scum game.

[Nero Cain]

Hell I could make the point HST had the scumteam nailed.

HST was a nullkill

.HST was believed a infinite shot informed townie who knew all the scums.

I think this Math telling us why they shot HST. I feel like sandwiching a believable scenario between two very unlikely ones has the purpose of discrediting their own points so it looks like nothing said is true when in fact the truth

IS

stuck in there. I don't really feel like pulling quotes or anything b/c it would take too much effort but I was in a game that we lost and in the end game Math came in and was like "I taught player X the null kill." So we know Math uses null kill theory and even though this is Math using this as a theoretical argument I think Math is truth-telling here.

I mean Math is scum for other reasons too but yeah this is still scum.

[MathBlade]

They towntold really hard.

you know that guy that scumtold and flipped town?

It's almost like towntells and scumtells aren't going to be very reliable. Also towntelling as scum is a part of a Maths scum game.

So in other words I am scum because I am good scum before.

*rolls eyes*

You literally scumread me every game we are in. Hell your username might as well be eternally voting MathBlade. I even mentioned this before. I guess that is why you're dropping your vote on me. I'm safe for you because you do it every freaking game. It's really old.

[MathBlade]

Hell I could make the point HST had the scumteam nailed.

HST was a nullkill

.HST was believed a infinite shot informed townie who knew all the scums.

I think this Math telling us why they shot HST. I feel like sandwiching a believable scenario between two very unlikely ones has the purpose of discrediting their own points so it looks like nothing said is true when in fact the truth

IS

stuck in there. I don't really feel like pulling quotes or anything b/c it would take too much effort but I was in a game that we lost and in the end game Math came in and was like "I taught player X the null kill." So we know Math uses null kill theory and even though this is Math using this as a theoretical argument I think Math is truth-telling here.

I mean Math is scum for other reasons too but yeah this is still scum.

lol I was just listing as many reasons as I could think of.

*clutches stomach from too much laughter*

[Nero Cain]

TBF, I was town reading your slot in Civ until your sister started with the whole "ZOMG you aren't voting AB, you must be scum with him!"

but its nice to know that you are discrediting my vote on you despite me stating why I'm voting you.

[TwoInAMillion]

Hell I could make the point HST had the scumteam nailed.

HST was a nullkill

.HST was believed a infinite shot informed townie who knew all the scums.

I think this Math telling us why they shot HST. I feel like sandwiching a believable scenario between two very unlikely ones has the purpose of discrediting their own points so it looks like nothing said is true when in fact the truth

IS

stuck in there. I don't really feel like pulling quotes or anything b/c it would take too much effort but I was in a game that we lost and in the end game Math came in and was like "I taught player X the null kill." So we know Math uses null kill theory and even though this is Math using this as a theoretical argument I think Math is truth-telling here.

I mean Math is scum for other reasons too but yeah this is still scum.

Not a convincing argument.

+1 Math -1 Nero

[MathBlade]

TBF, I was town reading your slot in Civ until your sister started with the whole "ZOMG you aren't voting AB, you must be scum with him!"

but its nice to know that you are discrediting my vote on you despite me stating why I'm voting you.

TBF you were townreading me this game until you needed a convenient vote with the whole "OMG Math must be scum because they've been scum before!"

But it's nice to know your vote has no reason.

[TwoInAMillion]

Current reads:

TwoInAMillion
Rah
Whiskers
Gerrygoat
Mathblade

Shiro
beeboy
AxleGreaser
IAmInnocent

NeroCain
Nauci
Viomi
Lucky2u

[Nero Cain]

Yeah this is Math scum. I've said about two or 3 times that that buddying up to the "masons" was scummy as fuck. Math keeps ignoring it to keep up the discredit.

[Nero Cain]

Also my first post today was literally calling Math scum so this "Nero's vote is opportunistic." is so incredibly untrue.

[TwoInAMillion]

Yeah this is Math scum. I've said about two or 3 times that that buddying up to the "masons" was scummy as fuck. Math keeps ignoring it to keep up the discredit.

Is it better to attack your townbuddies?

[Nero Cain]

What?

[MathBlade]

Also my first post today was literally calling Math scum so this "Nero's vote is opportunistic." is so incredibly untrue.

When other people vote me you don't have to try. First post or not it is still opportunistic.

[Nero Cain]

Why aren't you voting Whiskers?

[MathBlade]

Why aren't you voting Whiskers?

Because I townread Whiskers reasons already stated.

Why aren't you voting Lucky?

[AxleGreaser]

@thread

about Gerry.

Spoiler: latest outstanding questions with no answers, and apparently no intention of answering or being held accountable.

@Gerry

back in 3359 I asked you number of questions that you have chosen to ignore.
I have made them harder to ignore.

Question 1

referring to Gerry's3144 Gerry said

all those show certainty, so that read by axle is bullshit

If you were so certain.

Why so easily persuaded onto whiskers?

Question 2

If you were so certain.

VOTE: whiskers

okay you sold me

and if it >

truthfully

< sold you.
Then scum reading whiskers now would also be your read.

1. All of it sold me, but I don't want to change anymore. I want to follow my reads

Why if it sold you was Whiskers not then your read?
Are you agreeing that the claim it sold you was a lie?

Question 3

When the vote count was 2080 WHisk(4) Flubb(4) UCV(2)
If you were, as certain, as you claim to have been.

i just want day 1 to be over tbh.

VOTE: flubber

Why did you just want the day to be over

rather than try to get your "all those show certainty,"(3145) scum read lynched?
Deadline was still at that point several days away.

and then you seemed entirely flippant about who you lynched.

I Do Not Like This Wagon.

ok then i'll join another wagon VOTE: whiskers

What looked so good about the wagon?

That lucky wagon looks so good

It looks to me like you want wagon where no one will ask you why you are on it.
Especially not ask you for more than empty largely reasonless statements such as those listed in 3144

latest example of thumbing of nose at playing for town at all

will we finally lynch lucky? find out next time on dragon ball z

So how is Gerry's play scum motivated?
Playing without accountability to maximise flexibility to do anything he wants. No actual evidence of him trying to figure the game out.
Just a willingness to vote whatever has the lowest levels of accountability.

and where did this Flubber vote come from?

So why is everyone voting flubber now?

I read and still don't get it

i just want day 1 to be over tbh.

VOTE: flubber

VOTE: gerryoat << intention to lynch

[Nero Cain]

Like I assume the answer wll be something along the lines of "well, Flubb flipped town so I don't think that using the counter wagon argument is reliable."

Which is a load of bullshit.

[Nero Cain]

Why aren't you voting Lucky?

b/c he's town.

[Rhah]

They towntold really hard.

you know that guy that scumtold and flipped town?

It's almost like towntells and scumtells aren't going to be very reliable. Also towntelling as scum is a part of a Maths scum game.

Still, Math isn't going to flip scum here. Also Alisae was really painfully town.

VOTE: gerryoat << intention to lynch

You've been voting him for the past two days.

[Nero Cain]

Axe, help me get Math. I promise a scum flip.

[TwoInAMillion]

@thread

about Gerry.

Spoiler: latest outstanding questions with no answers, and apparently no intention of answering or being held accountable.

@Gerry

back in 3359 I asked you number of questions that you have chosen to ignore.
I have made them harder to ignore.

Question 1

referring to Gerry's3144 Gerry said

all those show certainty, so that read by axle is bullshit

If you were so certain.

Why so easily persuaded onto whiskers?

Question 2

If you were so certain.

VOTE: whiskers

okay you sold me

and if it >

truthfully

< sold you.
Then scum reading whiskers now would also be your read.

1. All of it sold me, but I don't want to change anymore. I want to follow my reads

Why if it sold you was Whiskers not then your read?
Are you agreeing that the claim it sold you was a lie?

Question 3

When the vote count was 2080 WHisk(4) Flubb(4) UCV(2)
If you were, as certain, as you claim to have been.

i just want day 1 to be over tbh.

VOTE: flubber

Why did you just want the day to be over

rather than try to get your "all those show certainty,"(3145) scum read lynched?
Deadline was still at that point several days away.

and then you seemed entirely flippant about who you lynched.

I Do Not Like This Wagon.

ok then i'll join another wagon VOTE: whiskers

What looked so good about the wagon?

That lucky wagon looks so good

It looks to me like you want wagon where no one will ask you why you are on it.
Especially not ask you for more than empty largely reasonless statements such as those listed in 3144

latest example of thumbing of nose at playing for town at all

will we finally lynch lucky? find out next time on dragon ball z

So how is Gerry's play scum motivated?
Playing without accountability to maximise flexibility to do anything he wants. No actual evidence of him trying to figure the game out.
Just a willingness to vote whatever has the lowest levels of accountability.

and where did this Flubber vote come from?

So why is everyone voting flubber now?

I read and still don't get it

i just want day 1 to be over tbh.

VOTE: flubber

VOTE: gerryoat << intention to lynch

I am assuming there is more content coming from Gerry later on. If not he will be a lynch candidate.

[TwoInAMillion]

Rhah if you join me on Lucky, I'll vote anyone you want from my blue or red list tomorrow.

[Nero Cain]

What happens when Lucky flips town?

[Rhah]

Self vote gambit isn't town anyway. The whole idea that Whiskers voted themselves because a full force Whiskers wagon was inevitably being pushed and the gamestate couldn't advance without it really falls apart when you see how unlikely that was to actually happen.

[TwoInAMillion]

Self vote gambit isn't town anyway. The whole idea that Whiskers voted themselves because a full force Whiskers wagon was inevitably being pushed and the gamestate couldn't advance without it really falls apart when you see how unlikely that was to actually happen.

Trust me, Whiskers is town, just like flub was town. Whiskers is just playing bad.

We need to work as a team here.