Screw you. Don’t even friggin act like that’s all I did.In post 5245, Whiskers wrote:"hnmmmmmm interesting result" isn't vca.
Idiot
Screw you. Don’t even friggin act like that’s all I did.In post 5245, Whiskers wrote:"hnmmmmmm interesting result" isn't vca.
@whiskersIn post 5210, I Am Innocent wrote: I want to know who Nero/Whiskers/Axel/Flair's replacement find scummy.
Why is no one responding to this besides the guy that I'm calling scummy?In post 5226, Nero Cain wrote:is this a thing newb scum would do?In post 5225, Nero Cain wrote:.UC was trying to paint me as an Alisae buddy so that could be a thing
what are you thinking right now?In post 5255, Nero Cain wrote:unvote
atleast one of the following is true.
I am already voting scum
the three scum have not gotten on all at the same time
there is not three scum
a 3/15 doesn't seem impossible at all to me, maybe even makes the most sense with the low town power.In post 5257, Transcend wrote:there is not three scum
That did not answer any of these 3 important questions.In post 5235, I Am Innocent wrote:Axle i hated playing with you last game. You frustrated me as town, power role town that got me undue attention and an early claim/exit as I recall. But there is value in that play style. I’ve seen twoface act the same way and when a player like thattunnelson scum it is terrible for the scum team. So while I hated it last game I still see value in it.
So I was wary from the beginning. Factor in this change in play style I was wary from the beginning
and at that point I agreed the style has changed and did so in order to be less *****In post 4986, I Am Innocent wrote:then the ***** I played with in the first flower game.
So yes I did indeed vote only limited number of people in this game. Which would suggest I focussed on my reads and pursuing them just like you claimed I wasnt?In post 5236, I Am Innocent wrote:Axle your vote history looks like this
Nero (short lived rvs type vote)
Quick
Whiskers
Gerry
Smocaine
Assemble
Interesting so many living players have voted whiskers this game (me, lucky, Nero, axle), once again I don’t think I want to push whiskers today.
but I don't remember and when I went back and looked I dint find any effort by you early game to try and interact with me and sort me out by finding out whether the style change or anything else was alignment indicative.So I was wary from the beginning.
However that smells like bad blood, and it could as towny explain bias.In post 5235, I Am Innocent wrote:Axle i hated playing with you last game. You frustrated me as town, power role town that got me undue attention and an early claim/exit as I recall. (note I havent checked what happened yet busy, and it probably did.)
I presume that is meant to be rhetorical question as it was not asked of anybody.In post 5184, I Am Innocent wrote:Why does scum Lucky stay on mathblade until it can become a wagon again (4400).
In post 5225, Nero Cain wrote:In post 5091, Nero Cain wrote:My original town read on Lucky was a mostly holdover from UC. Claiming scum is WIFOM and every once in awhile there are scum that claim scum. The reason that scum get away with this is because bad/dumb town do it. I had felt like UC's scum claims were the type of Lulzy claims that come from silly town that think they are doing something useful. I had also felt like UC was an easy lynchbait target and I didn't really have an issue with Lucky's first content post like Rhah and Math did.
this was my first little side eye against him. I'm sure you'll pull quotes that show me still town reading him (and I was) but yeah...I'm always going to have differing thoughts in my head.In post 3954, Nero Cain wrote:TBF, Lucky has seemed maybe a little lurky latelybut I agree that both cases against him have been crap.
My real concern with Lucky started with his quick hammer of Math. Being on a scum lynch is a tremendous amount of town cred and scum desperately trying to get on and it also had the added benefit of cutting off discussion and ending any mass claim. If Lucky is scum then I think this points somewhat to scum being in the unclaimed trash.
In post 4893, Nero Cain wrote:Luckys quick hammer on Math was terrible and I looked back in my post log. UC was trying to paint me as an Alisae buddy so that could be a thing.I think it was a perfectly reasonable question to ask why he didn't claim yesterday so I'm not the biggest fan of the slight pushback here.In post 4908, Lucky2u wrote:Didn't need to. I was in full control of the lynch with my hammer, why then add my role, it would only benefit scum to know at that point.
-1 nero
I also feel like, if his reasoning for not claiming was that scum might shoot at him why he'd claim VT the next day. That seems very inconsistent.
scum threatening to self-hammer?In post 4933, Lucky2u wrote:I got my hammer, if you want my neck, come and get it.
My experience with Lucky is that he's an unapologetically bad hypocrite. Doesn't necessarily mean he's town but that's aleast normal for him. I remember alot of people pushing UC as scum but it seems like the UC/Lucky hate has really died down since I've started pushing them. Who was pushing UC as scum and is now not pushing Lucky as scum, anyone still alive?
If you knew that Alisae was a busser as scum, why didn't you want Whisker blood for so long?In post 5209, Transcend wrote:So long story short I'll eat my hat if he didn't bus at some point and the only person left is whiskers
I actually think the opposite is more common. Scum going against the grain since they know its wrong. Either you are just very very pocketed or you are scum yourself thats not going to bite the guy town reading you.In post 5221, Lucky2u wrote:However given my unpopular nature in this game, the fact that I was scum reading IAI, and how easy it would have been to just jump on my wagon