Open 67 Two of Four (a7) Over! before 578

farside22 · Post Post #25 (ISO) » Fri Mar 21, 2008 6:53 am

Lowell wrote:
Thorbjorn wrote:
Lowell wrote:FTR, I don't think putting someone at lynch -1 early on D1 matters. I'm more skeptical of those who throw up their arms and scream about it than those who do it.
I'd agree with that except for the fat that I'm in a game currently where on the first day, someone got put at L-1 and a random townie waltzed in and hammered before anyone could react. Albeit, we did hit scum, but it left us completely without leads on day 2.
Uh, okay. Um, congrats.

You could probably count the number of times that's happened on one hand, wheras the "OMG you put him at L-1 OMGOMGOMG!!" happens... every time.

This game makes it so that one mislynch can equal lylo the next day. It should be questioned why he chose one person over the other in an L-1 situation.

shaft.ed · Post Post #26 (ISO) » Fri Mar 21, 2008 7:16 am

You look up at the scoreboard. It still reads Home: 5 Away: 2
farside22's name is illuminated with a single light bulb blaring next to it.
The clock reads 18:05:49 and is still descending

Vote Count

farside22

(Thorbjorn)

Lowell

(mozsuggs)

mozsuggs

(DoctorJimmy)

Near

(Lowell)

DoctorJimmy

(Erratus Apathos)

Not voting: farside22, Near

DoctorJimmy · Post Post #27 (ISO) » Fri Mar 21, 2008 8:35 am

Accidental or intentional quicklynches from someone putting someone else at L -1 on the first page may be rare, but in a 7-person game they can be disastrous for the town so it's best not to even take the chance.

If nothing else, questions and reactions directed at someone who put someone else at L-1 early on frequently help to pull a game out of the random stage at the beginning.

Near · Post Post #28 (ISO) » Sat Mar 22, 2008 7:17 am

vote: farside22

for not voting.

farside22 · Post Post #29 (ISO) » Sat Mar 22, 2008 10:22 am

Near wrote:
vote: farside22
for not voting.

hypocritcal much. You didn't have a vote till now.

Plus I don't trust people after mozsuggs attempt at quick voting.

Erratus Apathos · Post Post #30 (ISO) » Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:37 am

Unvote, vote: Lowell

for not answering 23

Lowell · Post Post #31 (ISO) » Mon Mar 24, 2008 3:03 am

Because he fires wildly and isn't overly concerned with being a suspect. How's that?

Thorbjorn · Post Post #32 (ISO) » Mon Mar 24, 2008 6:08 am

Lowell wrote:Because he fires wildly and isn't overly concerned with being a suspect. How's that?

I'm not sure that that is a very good way to determine who town is. Cool confidence is a nice thing to help a case, but it can be emulated, and firing wildly tends to get confusing. Confusion being one of the main scum weapons.

Lowell · Post Post #33 (ISO) » Mon Mar 24, 2008 7:35 am

Okay, fair enough. But someone asked why I suspected someone else of being town... on page 2. So it'll do for now.

shaft.ed · Post Post #34 (ISO) » Tue Mar 25, 2008 4:59 am

The intercom screeches piercing your eardrums like daggers.

Uncle Theo wrote:It's been almost and hour and noone's said a thing. You'd best get conversing if you expect to root out the evil in this place.

mozsuggs sleeps deeply in the corner. You poke him but he continues to sleep.

farside22 · Post Post #35 (ISO) » Tue Mar 25, 2008 6:13 am

I've been waiting to see is Near replies to my comment. Typically I run across hypocritical = scummie. Call it OMGUS. His vote is crap with hypocritical reasoning.

vote: Near

Near · Post Post #36 (ISO) » Tue Mar 25, 2008 7:10 am

farside22 wrote:I've been waiting to see is Near replies to my comment. Typically I run across hypocritical = scummie. Call it OMGUS. His vote is crap with hypocritical reasoning.

vote: Near

Naturally, I knew I was being "hypocritical" when I voted you for not voting. But from my perspective I know I am not a scum, and since we were the only two people who didn't have a vote at the time, I voted you.

On the other hand, voting someone for not voting this early in the game is pretty stupid. However you didn't point this out.

Confirm Vote: farside22

Near · Post Post #37 (ISO) » Tue Mar 25, 2008 7:12 am

Wait, shaft.ed. What does that mean? mozsuggs is not dead, is he?

Erratus Apathos · Post Post #38 (ISO) » Tue Mar 25, 2008 8:17 am

Near wrote:On the other hand, voting someone for not voting this early in the game is pretty stupid. However you didn't point this out. Confirm Vote: farside22

If you know it was stupid why were you doing it?

farside22 · Post Post #39 (ISO) » Tue Mar 25, 2008 8:31 am

Erratus Apathos wrote:
Near wrote:On the other hand, voting someone for not voting this early in the game is pretty stupid. However you didn't point this out. Confirm Vote: farside22
If you know it was stupid why were you doing it?

Better question is did he notice I vote and then unvote due to quick lynch people like mozsuggs in the game who is not paying attention?

Near · Post Post #40 (ISO) » Tue Mar 25, 2008 9:09 am

Erratus Apathos wrote:
Near wrote:On the other hand, voting someone for not voting this early in the game is pretty stupid. However you didn't point this out. Confirm Vote: farside22
If you know it was stupid why were you doing it?

I was prodded and I had to make a post and I decided to vote.

However, doing stupid things in the beginning could be helpful getting clues as to who the scums are. Just like in this case.

Farside responded to my post seriously. I am lead to think this way because he cited "hypocrisy" and voted me. In the mind of a scum, he is concerned that people find him suspicious. So it's natural for scum to get defensive. The fact that farside pointed out my hypocrisy, and accused me in the same way because of it, he is admitting his scuminess without putting much thoughts into it. This is a behavior of a scum.

Near · Post Post #41 (ISO) » Tue Mar 25, 2008 9:09 am

farside22 wrote:
Erratus Apathos wrote:
Near wrote:On the other hand, voting someone for not voting this early in the game is pretty stupid. However you didn't point this out. Confirm Vote: farside22
If you know it was stupid why were you doing it?
Better question is did he notice I vote and then unvote due to quick lynch people like mozsuggs in the game who is not paying attention?

Seriously? This makes you look less scummy?

shaft.ed · Post Post #42 (ISO) » Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:02 am

Near wrote:Wait, shaft.ed. What does that mean? mozsuggs is not dead, is he?

sorry that's mod flavor for "he has been prod'd and hasn't picked it up yet." Will be more clear if people prefer.

Near · Post Post #43 (ISO) » Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:39 am

shaft.ed wrote:
Near wrote:Wait, shaft.ed. What does that mean? mozsuggs is not dead, is he?
sorry that's mod flavor for "he has been prod'd and hasn't picked it up yet." Will be more clear if people prefer.

Now that we know what it means, i'm cool with it

farside22 · Post Post #44 (ISO) » Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:15 pm

Near wrote:
farside22 wrote:
Erratus Apathos wrote:
Near wrote:On the other hand, voting someone for not voting this early in the game is pretty stupid. However you didn't point this out. Confirm Vote: farside22
If you know it was stupid why were you doing it?
Better question is did he notice I vote and then unvote due to quick lynch people like mozsuggs in the game who is not paying attention?
Seriously? This makes you look less scummy?

You voted for me for not voting, that is your quote. Yet if you are voting on me for not voting it is faulty logic based on the fact that I did vote and unvoted do to some people be dumb asses. I admited the OMGUS, but stated that I waited on you to respond to my earlier comment. Noted you didn't respond till I voted. Reason?

Near · Post Post #45 (ISO) » Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:40 pm

farside22 wrote:
You voted for me for not voting, that is your quote. Yet if you are voting on me for not voting it is faulty logic based on the fact that I did vote and unvoted do to some people be dumb asses. I admited the OMGUS, but stated that I waited on you to respond to my earlier comment. Noted you didn't respond till I voted. Reason?

Are you trapping me to say "I didn't read your first post until you voted me" and then are you going to cite that there is another game that I made a post in between the time your two aforementioned posts?

How is this important? I really don't remember/know the reason. Nor do I think it's worth discussing.

farside22 wrote:You voted for me for not voting, that is your quote. Yet if you are voting on me for not voting it is faulty logic based on the fact that I did vote and unvoted do to some people be dumb asses.

Not sure exactly what you mean here. But let me clarify myself. Voting for you for not voting was stupid. I was in a hurry and was responding to a prod. It was your response to my vote that made you scummy.

Lowell · Post Post #46 (ISO) » Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:56 pm

I think there's a good chance you're both townies barking up the wrong tree, based on everyone's seeming lack of enthusiasm for jumping in with opinions.

Near · Post Post #47 (ISO) » Tue Mar 25, 2008 3:06 pm

Lowell wrote:I think there's a good chance you're both townies barking up the wrong tree, based on everyone's seeming lack of enthusiasm for jumping in with opinions.

What makes you think that neither of us are scums?

DoctorJimmy · Post Post #48 (ISO) » Tue Mar 25, 2008 5:40 pm

Near wrote:I was prodded and I had to make a post and I decided to vote.

However, doing stupid things in the beginning could be helpful getting clues as to who the scums are. Just like in this case.

Farside responded to my post seriously. I am lead to think this way because he cited "hypocrisy" and voted me. In the mind of a scum, he is concerned that people find him suspicious. So it's natural for scum to get defensive. The fact that farside pointed out my hypocrisy, and accused me in the same way because of it, he is admitting his scuminess without putting much thoughts into it. This is a behavior of a scum.

I'm kind of confused by this. You admit that you were being hypocritical, yet you call farside scummy for accusing you of being hypocritical? I really don't see what makes this scummy.

farside22 · Post Post #49 (ISO) » Tue Mar 25, 2008 6:45 pm

DoctorJimmy wrote:
Near wrote:I was prodded and I had to make a post and I decided to vote.

However, doing stupid things in the beginning could be helpful getting clues as to who the scums are. Just like in this case.

Farside responded to my post seriously. I am lead to think this way because he cited "hypocrisy" and voted me. In the mind of a scum, he is concerned that people find him suspicious. So it's natural for scum to get defensive. The fact that farside pointed out my hypocrisy, and accused me in the same way because of it, he is admitting his scuminess without putting much thoughts into it. This is a behavior of a scum.
I'm kind of confused by this. You admit that you were being hypocritical, yet you call farside scummy for accusing you of being hypocritical? I really don't see what makes this scummy.

My problem is that I didn't see his vote as a "joke" or random. It was never clear in his statement as such. I also will look to see if he was online for those 3 days I waited to see if he could have responded to the comment before I placed the vote. His continuing comment of calling me out for my vote based on his hypocrosy and admiting to his hypocrosy is just nuts.