Newbie 534: MafiaTV - Episode 2 - Finally Over!

Flameaxe · Post Post #50 (ISO) » Sat Jan 12, 2008 4:32 pm

Nothing to add.

copyWright · Post Post #51 (ISO) » Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:09 am

vote Ignatz2000

Not much else to add.

copyWright · Post Post #52 (ISO) » Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:41 am

No one else is saying anything! C'mon guys =)

Flameaxe · Post Post #53 (ISO) » Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:18 am

Anything.

pwayne66 · Post Post #54 (ISO) » Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:39 am

Not to point out the obvious, but copywright isn't saying anything either. Saying that nobody is saying anything is scummy but then not saying anything yourself is scummy.

Unvote. Vote: Copywright

Flameaxe · Post Post #55 (ISO) » Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:18 am

pwayne66 wrote:Not to point out the obvious, but copywright isn't saying anything either. Saying that nobody is saying anything is scummy but then not saying anything yourself is scummy.

Unvote. Vote: Copywright

This coming from Mr 3 post. It's just a big long chain of fun now.

Ignatz2000 · Post Post #56 (ISO) » Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:29 pm

Well this is just SO MUCH FUN, isn't it?

I would start a conversation, but frankly, I have no idea what to say.

I've already said my piece, and been voted for because of it.

pwayne66 · Post Post #57 (ISO) » Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:10 pm

Flameaxe wrote:This coming from Mr 3 post. It's just a big long chain of fun now.

Your deflection is noted.

Flameaxe · Post Post #58 (ISO) » Tue Jan 15, 2008 5:04 pm

Your small amount of contribution is noted.

pwayne66 · Post Post #59 (ISO) » Tue Jan 15, 2008 5:45 pm

No its not.

Flameaxe · Post Post #60 (ISO) » Tue Jan 15, 2008 5:58 pm

pwayne66 wrote:No its not.

How do you know what I've noted and what I haven't?

silence · Post Post #61 (ISO) » Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:25 pm

pwayne66: Why is saying that nobody is saying anything scummy?

I'd support lynching Ignatz2000 but it tould be premature now, Disciple Slayer hasn't posted even once.

pwayne66 · Post Post #62 (ISO) » Wed Jan 16, 2008 10:30 am

@Flameaxe- I'm that good...

@Silence- Saying that nobody is saying anything isn't scummy. Urging other people to post content while posting no content yourself might be.

Flameaxe · Post Post #63 (ISO) » Wed Jan 16, 2008 11:36 am

pwayne66 wrote:@Flameaxe- I'm that good...

@Silence- Saying that nobody is saying anything isn't scummy. Urging other people to post content while posting no content yourself might be.

Iammars · Post Post #64 (ISO) » Fri Jan 18, 2008 3:34 am

Looking to replace curateur and Disciple Slayer.

mongy101 replaces Disciple Slayer.

DoctorJimmy replaces curateur.

Actually Superfly does. Stupid queue troubles...

pwayne66 · Post Post #65 (ISO) » Sat Jan 19, 2008 7:45 am

I will be back Monday with a scumdar... It might be a good idea for everybody to post their impressions of everybody else. this game needs a serious shot of adrenalin...

pwayne66 · Post Post #66 (ISO) » Tue Jan 22, 2008 7:46 am

FlameAxe- No Lynch, argues against no lynch but continues to vote for it.

Hopes

we will assume that it was random:

FA wrote:Yes, I was the first, but it was a vote that wasn't even justified with anything, thus (I was hoping) it would be assumed as random.

...but doesn't want to say that it was.

It's my opinion that FlameAxe becomes uber defensive over Ignatz comments considering that Ignatz neither voted or FOSed Flameaxe intially. OMGUS vote of ignatz. #2 suspect.

Curateur- seconds no lynch and continues to defend it. Ignatz tops his list for his comment about Flameaxe? What about Copywrights suspicion of him but not Flameaxe? #3 suspect

Copywright- votes curateur but not flameaxe for voting no lynch and is now voting Ignatz with "nothing to add"? Why are you voting ignatz? #1 suspect

ignatz- What is flameaxe doing to make it appear that he is eager to get to night? #5 suspect

silence- safe contributions. Trying to fly under the radar. #4 suspect

Superfly · Post Post #67 (ISO) » Tue Jan 22, 2008 10:54 am

Hello, I am replacing curateur.

First of all, I think nolynch is stupid. Plain and simple. So

Unvote: No Lynch

.

Now for observations.

Ignatz and Flameaxe - I would assume one of them is scum and the other one isn't. Currently I am leaning towards Ignatz, because he seems to be making connections that aren't there and is at the very least overanalyzing things. On the other hand flameaxe has attacked at least 3 or 4 townies already, though that could be characteristic to his playstyle.

Silence and Pwayne - under the radar, have far less outspoken opinions than the other ones. Could be quiet townies, could be scum.

Copywright - "not much else to add" indeed. Likely newbie scum, especially if ignatz turns out to be a townie.

mangy - ??????

FOS: Copywright and FOS:Ignatz

pwayne66 · Post Post #68 (ISO) » Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:18 am

Welcome and thanks. To business...

Your summary seems to indicate that you believe that either Flameaxe or Ignatz or Copywright or Ignatz are scum. That's a huge FOS to Ignatz. So what connections is he trying to make that you are uncomfortable with?

Flameaxe · Post Post #69 (ISO) » Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:05 pm

Right, because arguing over a bullshit case is really "being defensive". I forgot that part.

Flameaxe · Post Post #70 (ISO) » Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:14 pm

Ignatz and Flameaxe - I would assume one of them is scum and the other one isn't. Currently I am leaning towards Ignatz, because he seems to be making connections that aren't there and is at the very least overanalyzing things. On the other hand flameaxe has attacked at least 3 or 4 townies already, though that could be characteristic to his playstyle.

Only two, and both were completely justified. Also, how would you know if I've attacked townies or not? *ponders*

pwayne66 · Post Post #71 (ISO) » Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:38 pm

FA wrote:Right, because arguing over a bullshit case is really "being defensive".

No it's not.

Responding to a off hand, inconsequential impression that another player has about you by calling them an idiot is defensive... no matter how you try to spin it.

Flameaxe · Post Post #72 (ISO) » Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:43 pm

pwayne66 wrote:
FA wrote:Right, because arguing over a bullshit case is really "being defensive".
No it's not.

Responding to a off hand, inconsequential impression that another player has about you by calling them an idiot is defensive... no matter how you try to spin it.

That isn't all I responded with though.

Superfly · Post Post #73 (ISO) » Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:00 pm

Flameaxe wrote:
Only two, and both were completely justified.

Yes, just pointing it out. It could mean a lot of things. Perhaps you just like to play agressively.

Also, how would you know if I've attacked townies or not? *ponders*

I just used the word townies based on the logic of "innocent until proven guilty".

pwayne66 wrote:So what connections is he trying to make that you are uncomfortable with?

His entire defense against flameaxe is full of them.

For example, he escalated this, which is clearly a random/joke vote....

Vote: No lynch

Good play right thar.

...into this.

Having the need to vote before anything has happened, encouraging others to vote "no lynch" in order to get to nighttime faster

Half of his argument is based on this and the other half based on flameaxe calling him an idiot.

I would vote ignatz, but it would be lynch-1 then so I am going to wait and think for a bit longer.

silence · Post Post #74 (ISO) » Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:24 am

I don't think Flameaxe was overdefensive, Ignatz's case, at least the interpretation of the 'Alas, it is not'-comment was so irreasonable that anybody could have attacked that.

About curateur/superfly nothing special, bandwagoning no lynch was not helpful, superfly's posts seem sensible. But, if Ignatz is scum, Ignatz's attacking Flameaxe and not curateur is at least tiny evidence of superfly being scum.

About pwayne66 nothing special either, I don't agree with all his list/conclusions but that doesn't make him scummy..

Why did copyWright decide to vote Ignatz in the "nothing else to add"-post without any explanation. Suspicious especially if Ignatz turns out to be scum

mongy101: has not posted yet.

List maybe something like
1. Ignatz2000
2. copyWright (if Ignatz2000 town)
3. Superfly (if Ignatz2000 scum)
4. pwayne66
5. Flameaxe
about mongy101 no idea yet.