ToastyToast wrote:Ok. SC or MrTrow should be today's revive. The question I asked (which I would like to be answered by everyone) suggests that SC is the least likely person to be scum of those 3 players.
MrTrow has been active and a great hunter. Awesoma sucked but he's put the name back up for argument.
Everyone answer this plz. I'm ready to vote but I want some opinions, yo
"A train robbery is where you take a train to your destination, make your move, and take a train back, right?"-Isaac
malpascp wrote:We don't know his role. There are reasons why town fakeclaims.
There aren't that many The first role that comes to mind as the real role of someone fakeclaiming is bomb, followed by cop depending on how you interpret Kokusho's gambit.
malpascp wrote:We don't know his role. There are reasons why town fakeclaims.
- Who`s role?
- name a good reason in this situation
IF (only if) we agree that the current setup is way too unbalanced, we must assume that there is someone that is fakeclaiming town.
Let me rephrase:
your post concluded such imbalance: you assumed fakeclaiming town bacause you assumed an (otherwise) unbalanced setup.
My question (after you recheck the purger), can you explain WHY YOU believe in the imbalance.
I am going to be under limited access from the 14th-19th August. I will be able to come online and check the game at least once every day but it won't be constant. Just an FYI, should not disrupt my ability to run the game in any way.
Scum hopping for WIFOM around my previous townread on Bub?
Besides the obvious WIFOM of Pom making the vote switch. If scum could let the kill unused, it is more than likely that they could do the same with the vote-switch thing.
malpascp wrote:Scum hopping for WIFOM around my previous townread on Bub?
Besides the obvious WIFOM of Pom making the vote switch. If scum could let the kill unused, it is more than likely that they could do the same with the vote-switch thing.
This post makes no sense.
advice from a trans otherkin queer plural system: you don't have to accept what normal says it's possible for you to be.
If Pom is not scum, then someone else alive is (obv)
If scum was alive in a kill-less night, that means that they didn't want to kill (kinda obv)
The most likely reason to scum to no-kill would be to "show" us that everyone alive was town. (obv)
If scum would waste a kill just to try do convince us that everyone alive was town, then they would have no problem with doing the same thing about the vote-switch thing. (also obv)
Any flaw on that line of thought? If you assume the first sentence as veridic (and that was already done by various people here), then you MUST assume that the last one is also true.
In that case, scum could give me the vote so I would think "wait, I always pushed for Bub's revival, so if I got Crypto's/IG's vote, then it's because scum wants me to vote for Bub" (WIFOM).
My two scumpicks are Packbat and malpascp at this point. I think bobsnox is telling the truth about his role but I still don't feel confident enough in him to have him revived.
StrangerCoug wrote:I'm obviously liking where this is going.
My two scumpicks are Packbat and malpascp at this point. I think bobsnox is telling the truth about his role but I still don't feel confident enough in him to have him revived.
Actually, if:
(a) we have two townies and two scumbags,
(b) bobsnox is town, and
(c) malpascp is scum,
reviving bobsnox might be our best shot at victory, because bobs could purge malpascp. In a 10v3 situation, that would mean a forced town win because scum could no longer acquire a majority.
advice from a trans otherkin queer plural system: you don't have to accept what normal says it's possible for you to be.