Mastin (4): Zachrulez, GIEFF, Battle Mage, Benmage
jammer (2): Kairyuu, SensFan
GIEFF (2): jammer, camn
Battle Mage (1): Mastin
broomhead (1): alexhans
Cephrir (1): Debonair Danny DiPietro
Not Voting: Cephrir, VP Baltar, broomhead, SpyreX
8 to lynch
Zachrulez wrote:Alexhans, why so upset about Mastin being bandwagoned?
I totally get to throw this in your face now.alexhans wrote:Zachrulez wrote:Alexhans, why so upset about Mastin being bandwagoned?
Do you want a scummy so you can appear to scumhunt or you want the real deal?
Scummy answer) Because We are scumpartners and Im totally defending him... oh... and we are 7 scum btw... this is actually lylo
Real answer) I see no reasons for voting him but atacking the first one who makes something to move the game. He is acting as he usually does and his auto-clearing doesn't seem scummy to me. Just mastin's personality. I should check a game where he is scum to have more information but from what I have now he is not scummy.
I'm not liking a fast waggon on an active, pro town player...
We should worry about those who DONT post or post null opinions and keep discussing everything...
If you really thought being anti-metagaming was a scumtell, you would not telegraph this so cavalierly. If your goal is to catch scum, you would wait and see who actually WAS anti-metagaming, rather than warn them away. You are clearly more concerned about leaving the RVS (or looking as if you want to leave the RVS) than you are about catching scum.Mastin wrote:Better than the RVS. We essentially skipped it with the metagaming scumhunting. Relying on scum hunting is what we'll eventually do. But for now, Meta rules.jammer wrote:You think(and others?) talking about meta, is a better way to find scum, then simple scumhunting?
And anyone who gets rid of metagaming as an argument with our current kill is going to instantly be labeled more likely to be scum from me.
And you yourself clarified that jammer's assumption should not be stated as fact because, at least partially, it is scummy. Once again, if your goal is to find scum, you would not find scummy things just for fun, like collecting seashells. You would find scummy things, build a case, make a vote, and try to convince others you are correct. What you have done is more helpful to scum than not - "How to stay off Mastin's suspicion-list in 5 easy steps."Mastin wrote:This is a fair assumption, but not to be stated as fact.
Mastin wrote:Has wouldn't be my choice with players I know;you can auto-clear me from picking the kill, as I would definitely try to lead as mafia and would have to be overridden by someone who I respect highly as a player and recognize the skill of to not nk another pro-town player.
Mastin wrote:Eh, fair enough, but I wouldn't recommend a random vote for very long.I'm killing the RVSwithout using my favorite tactics.
Mastin wrote:By the way,I just killed the RVS.
Mastin wrote:One of these days, I so totally want to ask a mod if I can nk myself as scum to create confusion and for the hilarity, but, well,I'm not scum this gameand that'd do no good.
Mastin wrote:Why only singling out Kai? I did it as well.GIEFF wrote: Kairyuu, what pro-town reason is there for listing the players you think that scum should kill?
And, to answer,it kinda clears me, if you believe what I say. (You should.I don't lie, even as scum, 'cept when I roleclaim as scum.)
Mastin wrote:Me? Use wifom? Ha.
The guy who never liesregardless of alignment 'cept about his alignment, pulling wifom. That'd be the day...
Yes, or come with something good. You say not to disregard the kill, yet I've seen nothing usefull on that topic coming from you.alexhans wrote: You suggest we ignore the kill?
Your previous post(before that) added more then? I prefer RVS above metaing N0 kills. I think that represents my thoughs about that matter. I think the attention I got with random voting, opposing Mastins meta idea and taking 4 scum as truth. Truly got us out of RVS and not the metaing that was bringing us nowhere.alexhans wrote: How's this simple scumhunting:You want us back in the RVS? What are you trying to make out of this?jammer wrote:Ignores the supposed killing of RVS of Mastin.
Vote: SensFan
For replacing out in comfirmation stage in my other game.
I was mainly pointing out mistakes in the metaing of kills.#Jammer's 26: what's your Conclusion? Are you scumhunting? Is mastin?
If you catched mafia using meta with the kill back then, I can follow. Till I hear you did that, I call the idea stupid.also, in addition to Mastin's following post I would tell you to look at Sensfan's death on n0 in Mafia 91. Not random.
Mastin has a very good point when he says that n0 kills are very probably not random.
You didn't research it, yet state it is stupid to say 4 scum is strange, multiple times.I don't feel like researching too much right now about numbers... I still stick to my 4 scum theory (And it's practically a wcs that we could use as guideline if we mislynch 3 times in a row... we'll assume lylo).
Could be a slip where you admitted there aren't 4 scum. While you first went with the flow and assumed 3-4 scum.Cephrir wrote:@DDD: Fair enough, it's contradictory. But does that really matter?
He certainly is entirely serious.Cephrir wrote:Now I'm not sure whether this was entirely serious or not, but if it was... yeah. Incidentally, it's also suspicious if it was entirely serious.Mastin wrote:Has wouldn't be my choice with players I know; you can auto-clear me from picking the kill, as I would definitely try to lead as mafia and would have to be overridden by someone who I respect highly as a player and recognize the skill of to not nk another pro-town player.
What is really the point of saying this?Mastin wrote:And, to answer, it kinda clears me, if you believe what I say. (You should. I don't lie, even as scum, 'cept when I roleclaim as scum.)
Seemeed like he was saying it was a reasonable guess to me. Also I think it is interesting that you only start questioning him after Mastin prods you for reasons.Gieff wrote:Jammer stated there are 4 scum as a fact, not as a guess, and without any reasoning presented. I don't know why a townie would just take a wild guess another player made as "believable truth."
Is this sarcastic?mastin wrote:The guy who never lies regardless of alignment 'cept about his alignment, pulling wifom. That'd be the day...
haha, if you'd like to believe that.camn wrote:He has that kind of integrity.
Actually it is very important because you were saying that he KNEW there were four scum, when what he really said was that he found alex's case to be "believable truth". The operative word there is believable...ie a theory to be believed. You definitely look scummy in this exchange as trying to stretch for an argument that isn't there.GIEFF wrote:Do you or do you not feel that jammer assumed there were four scum? Regardless of whether you want to call it truth or a fact, the point is that jammer assumed there were 4 scum
I'm jealous. I've always wanted to go. Have a pint for me!Spyrex wrote:Ireland is a hoot btw.
Nah, i disagree. Jammer can be Jammer. SpyreX can be Spyrex. Kairyuu can be Kairyuu. Hasdgfas can be Has. Cephrir can be Cephrir. You can be Lynchbait.alexhans wrote: Yaw #25:
From now on the short forms are:
Battle Mage = BM
SensFan = SF
alexhans = Alex
GIEFF = GIEFF
Cephrir = Ceph
VP Baltar = VP
Debonair Danny DiPietro = DDD
Kairyuu = Kai
camn = Camn
broomhead = Broom
SpyreX = Spy
Zachrulez = Zach
Benmage = Ben
Mastin = Mastin
jammer = Jam
hasdgfas = Hascow
Do we all agree? So we can easyly use Ctrl-f to look for a name OR short form? Remember, It all helps the town.
Very good point? It isnt brain surgery, pal. What scumgroup kills randomly?Alex Hans wrote: #Jammer's 26: what's your Conclusion? Are you scumhunting? Is mastin?
also, in addition to Mastin's following post I would tell you to look at Sensfan's death on n0 in Mafia 91. Not random.
Mastin has a very good point when he says that n0 kills are very probably not random.
It's really wierd how you are desperate to push the 4 scum theory, but it is in the interests of the town anyway to promote cautiousness.Alex Hans wrote: I don't feel like researching too much right now about numbers... I still stick to my 4 scum theory (And it's practically a wcs that we could use as guideline if we mislynch 3 times in a row... we'll assume lylo).
What's with all the rhetorical questions??Alex Hans wrote:Is this a joke vote? Are you voting a player who is on the spotlight for what reasons exactly? Are you going to be as combative as ever? Are we gonna end up fighting?SensFan wrote: jammer, if you read the site/my sig at the time, you would have known I was forced out of that game. So I'm going with aVote" jammer
Convenient? Whats your relationship with Hasdgfas?Alex Hans wrote:I agree with this.VP Baltar wrote: The kill would be most likely to come from someone who knows hascow. Furthermore, I believe that a senior player on the scum team would have more sway and would help direct the kill toward someone like hascow, as opposed to someone a newer person might be more inclined to kill based on overall site rep alone.
Trying to appear pro-town, whilst not actually saying anything.Alex Hans wrote:mmmm... I knew it...SensFan wrote:Seriously, guys.
SHUT THE FUCK UP ABOUT THE KILL.
Its something the Scum have 100% control over, and I'm betting most/all of the Scum are now trying to use that to also control the Day phase.
Sensfan...
Discussing, stating our opinions = Healthy
Shutting the fuck up = NOT healthy
Possibly the least intelligent thing i have ever read. ^Alex Hans wrote:Do not count your townies until they flip... Remember Steph?Zach wrote: I feel reasonably safe in calling you as town.
DDD: THIS is the time to speculate about deaths... later on, we wont be able because scum may choose to wifom. But right now. I'm sure it counts for something.
its not wierd, it's completely logical...Alex Hans wrote:Good point. It sounded weird to me too.DDD wrote:
Cephrir expects three or four scum, says we should assume four scum because of that possibility. And then concludes by stating there probably aren't four scum. While these statements are completely contradictory they certainly don't look good to me.
Lol, wow. It's the Random Vote Stage. Get over it. xDAlex Hans wrote: BM... YOUR #71 is much more scummy than anything you might pretend Mastin is... Hoping on a waggon just like that?
Oh, sorry i didnt realise we'd instituted a rule where the first players to post are protown. 0.oAlex Hans wrote: Mastin is an active and great player IMO and that's just his style. He was amongst the first people to post
Erm, do you always believe everything you're told?Alex Hans wrote: and he completely destroyed RVS (First time I've seen this) making this game really interesting from the get go.
How many times have you played with Mastin? I've gotta admit, he strikes me as the kinda guy who probably attracts more attention than he deserves, not the other way around. Why then, should it be wierd that he would get that attention here. In a game of this size, a 3rd vote is nothing, yet you appear to have shat a brick. Is it because Mastin is your scumchum, or more likely, because he is town, who you feel can be manipulated?Alex Hans wrote: I think that your move is odd and opportunistic.
Thats funny, because you did the exact same thing with Mastin, and myself. The only difference is, it appears you were being serious.Alex Hans wrote:dude... you dissapoint me... One post and you already have an opinion of allignment... I was just following Mastin's idea wich I though cool and Kai made it cooler.Battle Mage wrote: Smells....town. But i dont get the fixation with namedropping players you know. It ain't cool, and it ain't productive. Whoever did the italicising and underlining thing at least actually achieved something.If you're not helping don't criticize.I'm not calling anyone town until I'm REALLY convinced they are town... and event then... I will still watch them closely.
Damnit bro. Could you BE any more transparent? I'm intrigued to hear what Mastin makes of this. You quite clearly KNOW that Mastin is town, because you wouldnt defend your buddy like this. What i dont understand is the passion behind it. Are you and Mastin a couple irl?Alex Hans wrote:OK... WTF? BENMAGE??? YOU ARE CLEARLY JUMPING ON MASTIN WAGGON... IT'S REALLY SCUMMY YES! IM FURIOUS (HENCE THE CAPS). I LIKE MASTIN. HE HELPS TOWN. HE MAY BE SCUM BUT THERE ARE NO LEADS THAT INDICATE THAT RIGHT NOW.Benmage wrote:Vote Mastin
It's a really exploitable theory. Not protown.Alex Hans wrote:Bullshit. Mastin made a theory. It isn't foolproof. It doesn't rule him out. He provided a way to start the game.Benmage wrote: Now obviously I didn’t vote you. I don’t think this is the most compelling scum find. I am much more inclined to vote for Mastin who initiated this motive, and auto-ruled himself out, because he would obviously kill someone else if he was scum.
Yes, I’m inherently suspicious of anyone who either fails to take a stance or tries to make multiple stances because both of those are the easiest ways to make sure you’re never wrong or always partially right thus just slipping into the background.Cephrir wrote:@DDD: Fair enough, it's contradictory. But does that really matter?
Agreed. Ironically, Alex mentions M91 as solid reason for NK speculation, noting that Sens’ N0 death wasn’t random. Except the other scum group, which I was a part of, removed everyone we played with from the player list and then randomly killed from that list N0 as to throw off townies trying to do this exact kind of speculation. BM’s last two sentences perfectly sum up my opinion on this matter.Battle Mage wrote:Very good point? It isnt brain surgery, pal. What scumgroup kills randomly?Alex Hans wrote:also, in addition to Mastin's following post I would tell you to look at Sensfan's death on n0 in Mafia 91. Not random.
Mastin has a very good point when he says that n0 kills are very probably not random.
The flaw you have is, that any motive you give to a scumkill is automatically WIFOM. Thus, no conclusion you can draw from the kills can make a strong case.
I vote for who I think is Scum. That's it, that's all.alexhans wrote:Is this a joke vote? Are you voting a player who is on the spotlight for what reasons exactly? Are you going to be as combative as ever? Are we gonna end up fighting?SensFan wrote: jammer, if you read the site/my sig at the time, you would have known I was forced out of that game. So I'm going with aVote" jammer
No.alexhans wrote:mmmm... I knew it...SensFan wrote:Seriously, guys.
SHUT THE FUCK UP ABOUT THE KILL.
Its something the Scum have 100% control over, and I'm betting most/all of the Scum are now trying to use that to also control the Day phase.
Sensfan...
Discussing, stating our opinions = Healthy
Shutting the fuck up = NOT healthy
I'm willing to go on record saying there are are not 4 Scum.alexhans wrote:DO NOT DISCARD 4 scumteam. It may bite us in the ass if we mislynch thrice.
You'll never get scum lynched that way.SensFan wrote: I vote for who I think is Scum. That's it, that's all.
If you have any doubts about my ability to read with my gut, ask GIEFF.
Yeah, yeah. Don't worry.camn wrote:You'll never get scum lynched that way.SensFan wrote: I vote for who I think is Scum. That's it, that's all.
If you have any doubts about my ability to read with my gut, ask GIEFF.
You have to convince the rest of us!
As I said before, my suspicion was aroused when jammer said "With 4 scum..." Only later, after I asked him about it, did he call it a "believable truth," but him saying "4 scum" still looked like an assumption to me, and I would rather go on that than on somebody's later claims about the matter (Cause people sometimes lie in this game - we can't all be Mastin).VP Baltar wrote:Actually it is very important because you were saying that he KNEW there were four scum, when what he really said was that he found alex's case to be "believable truth". The operative word there is believable...ie a theory to be believed. You definitely look scummy in this exchange as trying to stretch for an argument that isn't there.GIEFF wrote: Do you or do you not feel that jammer assumed there were four scum? Regardless of whether you want to call it truth or a fact, the point is that jammer assumed there were 4 scum
OK WTF BATTLE MAGE???? YOU ARE CLEARLY STARTING A BENMAGE WAGGON.Battle Mage wrote:Damnit bro. Could you BE any more transparent? I'm intrigued to hear what Mastin makes of this. You quite clearly KNOW that Mastin is town, because you wouldnt defend your buddy like this. What i dont understand is the passion behind it. Are you and Mastin a couple irl?Alex wrote:OK... WTF? BENMAGE??? YOU ARE CLEARLY JUMPING ON MASTIN WAGGON... IT'S REALLY SCUMMY YES! IM FURIOUS (HENCE THE CAPS). I LIKE MASTIN. HE HELPS TOWN. HE MAY BE SCUM BUT THERE ARE NO LEADS THAT INDICATE THAT RIGHT NOW.Benmage wrote:
Vote Mastin
Then why are you so sure Mastin is town that you freak out when he gets 4 votes? That is inconsistent.Alex wrote:I'm not calling anyone town until I'm REALLY convinced they are town... and event then... I will still watch them closely.
Gut aside, you should be able to answer if your gut was influenced by the reasons I (assuming 4 scum) or Kai (trying to extend RVS) previously stated to vote for jammer. You have refused to do so twice now (maybe three times).SensFan wrote:I vote for who I think is Scum. That's it, that's all.
If you have any doubts about my ability to read with my gut, ask GIEFF.
Based on past experience, it may be a good idea to consider L-2 as L-1 in this game. Sens-scum may try to use his "I WILL QUICKHAMMER ANYBODY" meta to get away with a scum-hammer, or a misguided town-hammer.camn wrote:You'll never get scum lynched that way.
You have to convince the rest of us!
If I think someone is Scum, and they are at L-1, absolutely I will hammer. I expect the same of everyone else in this game.GIEFF wrote:Based on past experience, it may be a good idea to consider L-2 as L-1 in this game. Sens-scum may try to use his "I WILL QUICKHAMMER ANYBODY" meta to get away with a scum-hammer, or a misguided town-hammer.
Maybe I'm prejudiced by my past experiences but I STILL don't see how why he has acted anti-town.GIEFF wrote: Long posts do not mean pro-town. I don't think Mastin has acted pro-town at all.
Jammer. I sense agressivenes... Haven't we got the game moving with that topic?Jammer wrote:Yes, or come with something good. You say not to disregard the kill, yet I've seen nothing usefull on that topic coming from you.
My intention was never to lynch someone using meta. My inention was to get the game moving with some rather serious accussations so people could start arguing, siding, reacting, retorting, etc, etc.jammer wrote: If you catched mafia using meta with the kill back then, I can follow. Till I hear you did that, I call the idea stupid.
jammer wrote:ou didn't research it, yet state it is stupid to say 4 scum is strange, multiple times.
Battle Mage wrote:Unvote, Vote: Alex Hans
Serious vote. Serious wagon required.
BM
It is a way to organize things so it's easier to make searchs afterwards. Has is not a good short form, at all. Hasd is better in that case but hascow is just 2 letters longer and that joke is NOT funny because you seem intent in pulling it off.Battle Mage wrote: Nah, i disagree. Jammer can be Jammer. SpyreX can be Spyrex. Kairyuu can be Kairyuu. Hasdgfas can be Has. Cephrir can be Cephrir. You can be Lynchbait.
*sigh*BM wrote: The flaw you have is, that any motive you give to a scumkill is automatically WIFOM. Thus, no conclusion you can draw from the kills can make a strong case.
Ok... this kind of posts always scream scummy to me. This is called SOFT-PUSHING or SOFT-IMPLYING or whatever. You agree with me in the quid of the matter but still call me "weird" for it. Weird is used when you want others to think... oh...BM wrote:
It's really wierd how you are desperate to push the 4 scum theory, but it is in the interests of the town anyway to promote cautiousness.
I know SF has a strong personality. I'm just testing the waters. What's wrong with them, anyway? are you just adding fluff to an otherwise lame case?BM wrote: What's with all the rhetorical questions??
I'd appreciate if you read what I said a long time ago before asking that SAME question.BM wrote:Convenient? Whats your relationship with Hasdgfas?Alex Hans wrote:I agree with this.VP Baltar wrote: The kill would be most likely to come from someone who knows hascow. Furthermore, I believe that a senior player on the scum team would have more sway and would help direct the kill toward someone like hascow, as opposed to someone a newer person might be more inclined to kill based on overall site rep alone.
Note 2 things.Alexhans FIRST post wrote:I've played with Hascow before and he was not a very active scum player... at least in that game. Maybe it was because the town had 80 % of lynchable material (Empking, Zwets, Dejkha, Wall-e and Hewitt). Anyway... If I had to kill... knowing there were no protections whatsoever... I would've killed... sensfan? Mastin? someone random that I don't know? Probably I wouldn't have had a voice in a scumteam....
BM... you're really starting to annoy me and you're really starting to look like trying to fake a case instead of actually scumhunting.BM wrote: Trying to appear pro-town, whilst not actually saying anything.
^ Possibly the less useless comment I've ever heard.BM wrote:
Possibly the least intelligent thing i have ever read. ^
Why coach Zach? And who is Steph?
Ok. Stop with the contradictions without explanations. EXPLAIN. EXPLAIN. EXPLAIN. If you state something, don't leave it hanging there. No one has the ultimate truth.BM wrote:
its not wierd, it's completely logical...
...BM wrote: Lol, wow. It's the Random Vote Stage. Get over it. xD
Ok. I didnt take it that seriously but I guess it's somewhat valid to vote for him. But... would you lynch him for it?BM wrote: In any case, my vote was not without reason. Mastin came right out of the gate pushing an argument that was not only completely illogical, but was also likely to lead to the lynch of AT LEAST 1, and possibly 3 or 4, townies. What do you expect me to do?
YES Rule 195 of the mafia handbook!!!!BM wrote: Oh, sorry i didnt realise we'd instituted a rule where the first players to post are protown. 0.o
I knowBM wrote: Active and great player, as he may be, it doesnt mean he is town
I wouldn't be so sure about that as I've explained before.BM wrote:, or worth keeping around.
No, BUT, I think one may always sense if a vote is forced or not. Benmage's vote, for example, sounded forced to me.BM wrote:Nor does it make people who are suspicious of him, automatically scummy.
what??? I don't follow your logic that the only way in wich RVS was destroyed is if mastin is scum... Could you rephrase it in a way a 5 year old could understand?BM wrote: The only way you can claim that Mastin destroyed the RVS, is if you assume that he is scum, and/or the wagon on him is legitimate. You don't seem to believe this, thus you cannot claim that we have left the RVS.
woah... Loaded questions... (Bolded for emphasis)BM wrote:How many times have you played with Mastin? I've gotta admit, he strikes me as the kinda guy who probably attracts more attention than he deserves, not the other way around. Why then, should it be wierd that he would get that attention here. In a game of this size, a 3rd vote is nothing, yet you appear to have shat a brick.Is it because Mastin is your scumchum, or more likely, because he is town, who you feel can be manipulated?
Oh... so you were joking? that explains your sudden change to an Alexhans vote...BM wrote:Thats funny, because you did the exact same thing with Mastin, and myself. The only difference is, it appears you were being serious
I've been criticized for taking things to seriously but it's just a desire to optimize this game. Hascow was KILLED after all. Have you got no conscience???BM wrote: You said yourself that opinions are important. How seriously do you take an unsubstantiated claim?
"If you dont Help Dont criticize"BM wrote: Can you please explain the bit in bold?
So... what I get from this is...BM wrote: Damnit bro. Could you BE any more transparent? I'm intrigued to hear what Mastin makes of this. You quite clearly KNOW that Mastin is town, because you wouldnt defend your buddy like this. What i dont understand is the passion behind it. Are you and Mastin a couple irl?
I don't understand you... You accuse me of buddying a TOWN mastin but then you coach me to open my mind?BM wrote: Maybe if you quit whinging and listen to the points against Mastin with an open mind, you might fare better in the game.
I STILL don't know where you lean...BM wrote: It's a really exploitable theory. Not protown.
Sicilian Mafia:Alexhans wrote: Agreed. Ironically, Alex mentions M91 as solid reason for NK speculation, noting that Sens’ N0 death wasn’t random. Except the other scum group, which I was a part of, removed everyone we played with from the player list and then randomly killed from that list N0 as to throw off townies trying to do this exact kind of speculation. BM’s last two sentences perfectly sum up my opinion on this matter.
VP Baltar QT wrote: Sensfan might be a good kill. I don't know him, but I think he is a skillful player--seems well known around the site.
Japanese Mafia:Ztife QT wrote: As said earlier, empking/zwet have a tendency of not being very contributive, they are actually beneficial to have around. Sensfan sounds good.
DDD wrote:Anyways, here's the list of people in the game with us removed and the people I want to keep around removed as well. Feel free to repost the list removing players you want to keep around so we can figure out who we want to kill on N0.
later... DDD just states his proposal.Pablo QT wrote:I have only played with one of them and it's an ongoing game, so I am little help here. I've seen some SensFan play before and could go for him as the kill on night 0.
So I don't have a clue if there's a motive or if it's just random. But I clearly remembered the sensfan kill speculation and motives by people in BOTH scumteams.DDD wrote:Anyways, here's my proposal for N0...
Kill: Zilla
Block: Benmage
Ok... But one doesnt make a lynch. If you state some good reasons you will be able to convince people (specially me, I wont go for unreasoned votes)sensfan wrote: I vote for who I think is Scum. That's it, that's all.
If you have any doubts about my ability to read with my gut, ask GIEFF.
meh... seems like a lot of people disagree with me. I've stated my opinion about the matter. We'll have to deal with the differences.Sensfan wrote: Discussing and stating opinions about the Night Kill = Not Fucking Healthy
Shutting the fuck up about stuff the Scum has full control over = Healthy
Ok. The more I hear all of you, the more I doubt my own 4 scum theory... BUT, as I've said, let's not take 3 for granted. It doesnt hurt us to think about wcs.sensfan wrote: I'm willing to go on record saying there are are not 4 Scum.
I don't really know. I thought it up as if I were the mod. don't know Yaw enough because I just played a newbie game with him as mod.Sensfan wrote:You really think a mod like Yaw would make a 4:11 set-up? I think it far more likely that we're dealing with a 3:12 set-up, and there's even a higher chance of 2:13 than 4:11.
Because I didnt want to lose my broomhead vote... I want the guy to stop lurking or to appear and react. I can't have 2 votes so I stated my opinions in a clear way and I Fosed him. It's good enough for me. He will have to answer. Can anyone doubt that I find him scummy atm?GIEFF wrote: Alex - if you think jumping on a Mastin wagon is "really scummy", why didn't you follow up on it at all? All you did was throw out an FOS to one of the players on the wagon, without any further questioning or prodding. Looks to me as if you don't really think the wagon is all that scummy - you just want it to fall apart from THREATS of scumminess
No GIEFF. I NEVER called mastin town. I just said that he doesn't seem town to me and that I don't like the cases on him.GIEFF wrote: Then why are you so sure Mastin is town that you freak out when he gets 4 votes? That is inconsistent.
If you hammer a townsperson with that logic and you dont explain why said person is scum it's totally anti-town.Sensfan wrote: If I think someone is Scum, and they are at L-1, absolutely I will hammer. I expect the same of everyone else in this game.