Newbie #840 (Game Over!)

[DarkLightA]

EBWODP: I really enjoy really fast games. My first one completed day 1 in 2-3 days, with 520 posts.

[Snow_Bunny]

Well, lurking is not only not posting anything at all, it also includes short and useless posts (and even those that try to pass as useful).

[Snow_Bunny]

But, fast games means less time for the town to discuss, and in my experience, less short days == bad thing for town.

[DarkLightA]

But, fast games means less time for the town to discuss, and in my experience, less short days == bad thing for town.

I mean fast as in quick posts from people, not as in two-day-day-one (lol at spelling)

[Snow_Bunny]

EBWOP: Ignore the "less" before "short". I was going to say "less time", but then I decided to change it as it is now.

[iamausername]

-=Vote Count #1=-

Snow_Bunny (1) - CooLDoG
Netopalis (1) - Sposh
CooLDoG (1) - Snow_Bunny

Not Voting (6) - DarkLightA, muh316, geekalicious, Santos, SpyreX, Netopalis

[Sposh]

Why is nobody else doing the randomly vote thing?

[Snow_Bunny]

Well, it's not mandatory to do so. It all depends on the taste of each player. I, myself, like to do it, but I won't judge others if they don't want to. After all, what's important it's not the vote, but the discussion it spams.

[Sposh]

Oh, alright.

Happy Birthday DarkLight!

[CooLDoG]

I have no idea why the heck I have a weird cap-uncap name... plus I don't think she was lurking, my god she posted 2 times before me! Do you think that I don't read posts before me, any way.

Also putting a FoS on someone on their first post needs to be accounted for, just to hit it right back at you, why did you put an FoS on a joke???

Plus when have you last seen in a noob game someone get voted off on the first day, we have not even tried to band-wagon someone...

Any way who really cares, at the first day its really hard to kill off someone if you have to have a strict majority, not just the most votes.

[Snow_Bunny]

So, what are you suggesting then? A no-lynch? Because I'm not too fond of that idea.

[Netopalis]

In re: the earlier question - two votes are bad if they are random because it makes it easier for someone to be lynched at random. I should think that this is fairly self-evident.

CooLDoG - if not for inactivity, why your vote for SnowBunny when she already had one on her?

No time to post the rest of my thoughts - I'll be back after class.

[DarkLightA]

Thanks, Sposh (cool date, huh?)

Un-Random-FoS

while I remember.

I personally am not a fan of random voting after once when I did it, and it ended up in a 6 person band wagon (L-1). I jumped off, and told everyone else to do so too. However, they weren't fans of unvoting, so yeah.. I ended up getting lynched for supporting this poor guy. I was pro-town though.

[Netopalis]

Ok....Sorry about that. Turns out that I have a few moments before my next class. My FoS on you was not a joke, Cooldog. I'm honestly having a bit of trouble getting to exactly what you're talking about....I just find you to be rather suspicious, nervous and generally odd. Call it a gut feeling.

[CooLDoG]

Ok....Sorry about that. Turns out that I have a few moments before my next class. My FoS on you was not a joke, Cooldog. I'm honestly having a bit of trouble getting to exactly what you're talking about....I just find you to be rather suspicious, nervous and generally odd. Call it a gut feeling.

That thing about, don't mess with my family, or what ever, was a joke, any way who really cares, so many null voted that we could not lynched someone if we wanted to. And why the heck would I think she was a lurker?

[Netopalis]

You never said why you voted for her - all that you gave for reasons for voting was a lurker policy - why did you vote? Was it random? OMGUS? Why did you vote for snow_bunny?

[Snow_Bunny]

It was omgus, as far as I can tell. And, as I said before, omgus isn't a good thing...

[Netopalis]

Snow_Bunny, with all due respect, I'd rather hear from him....

[geekalicious]

That thing about, don't mess with my family, or what ever, was a joke, any way who really cares, so many null voted that we could not lynched someone if we wanted to. And why the heck would I think she was a lurker?

I'm finding this implication of a "family" to be somewhat scummy. It could have been a joke or a reference to the scum "family", and I'm not quite sure which. Additionally, I also want some more qualification on why you chose to vote for Snow_Bunny over the other players. Like she's mentioning, it seems to be OMGUS as you already had a vote out on her.

Any way who really cares, at the first day its really hard to kill off someone if you have to have a strict majority, not just the most votes.

Sorry if I'm being dense, but what do you mean by this...?

In re: the earlier question - two votes are bad if they are random because it makes it easier for someone to be lynched at random. I should think that this is fairly self-evident.

CooLDoG - if not for inactivity, why your vote for Snow_Bunny when she already had one on her?

No time to post the rest of my thoughts - I'll be back after class.

I still can't see what led you to accuse CooLDoG for voting for Snow_Bunny because of lurking when he said absolutely nothing to suggest that as the vote reason.

[Sposh]

Thanks, Sposh (cool date, huh?)

Un-Random-FoS

while I remember.

I personally am not a fan of random voting after once when I did it, and it ended up in a 6 person band wagon (L-1). I jumped off, and told everyone else to do so too. However, they weren't fans of unvoting, so yeah.. I ended up getting lynched for supporting this poor guy. I was pro-town though.

I think you'd have to be pretty dumb as town to end up with a 6-person wagon via RVS and put someone at L-1, personally.

Also, I want to switch my vote.

Vote Snow Bunny

because it seems like SB is trying to make Cooldog look suspicious by saying he was OMGUS voting.

[Snow_Bunny]

Oh, really? Then, you have a better explanation to his vote? If so, please tell, I'd like to hear it.

[Netopalis]

Ok...After a reread of the original post by cool, and I think that I made a bit of a mistake....Here's the post again:

lynching a lurker is the best idea, they do nothing, and they don't really contribute to the game.

Don't mess with the family, Vote: Snowbunny

I know that sounded sooo cheesy

I took the quote without the "Don't mess with the family", counting that as a slip of the tongue to mean that he was setting Snowbunny up for a vote as she hadn't said a great deal. Looking at it again, I see that yeah, it's setting up the OMGUS. I wish he'd be a bit more clear about the intent of his posts...My apologies, but I find him to be nearly incoherent.


*shakes head* Sposh, I'm sure that she is, but why is this scummy in the first place and deserving of a vote? I'm not sure exactly why this is considered a scumtell in your opinion....

[SpyreX]

Actually, I'm having a hard time stomaching it, overall.

Between the, apparent, slip up (the use of family) and the reaction to the FoS I am bothered.

I'm doubly bothered by Sposh's vote in regards to the OMGUS voting - because it reads as CD is town being pushed up via scum, which is a fairly hard line stance at this juncture.

Although concerned with CD, I find post 44 more voteworthy.

Vote: Sposh

[geekalicious]

Actually, I'm having a hard time stomaching it, overall.

Between the, apparent, slip up (the use of family) and the reaction to the FoS I am bothered.

I'm doubly bothered by Sposh's vote in regards to the OMGUS voting - because it reads as CD is town being pushed up via scum, which is a fairly hard line stance at this juncture.

Although concerned with CD, I find post 44 more voteworthy.

Vote: Sposh

I think Sposh's vote on Snow_Bunny is scummy too. However, isn't it hasty to vote for Sposh before he even has a chance to respond to the accusations against him?

[SpyreX]

Hasty would be if a wagon formed before he does.

The vote is stating that this is serious business, is all.