Alright, first of all,
TheLonging wrote:I don't rely on meta cause I've played too many games where meta basically helped town lose.
If you rely on meta completely, you will lose. But it can be a helpful tool if applied correctly(which is it often not). Also, Longing is scummy for the bolded:
TheLonging wrote:I don't think it is.
Double-standards are very anti-town.
Anyways when Tasky gets back I'll decide if my vote should stay.
Double-standards aren't necessarily anti-town, or even scummy really. especially in the context it was used in, the RVS, it hardly matters at all.
Also, both gandalf and SharkFinn seem very happy simply to join on the wagon without really explaining WHY double-standards are "a serious offense". Shark, like longing, seems overly serious about the wagon. gandalf is quick to switch his vote to Longing, but we'll see.
diginova almost seems overtly cautious...L-4 on page 2 is not excessive, lynch on page 2 would be excessive, everything else is very much allowed. Being wary of an RVS wagon doesn't seem like much to be worried about.
MoI wrote:Given this statement we should expect no attacks from you later on in the game based on the premise of inconsistency in reads I take it?
You can expect of me whatever you want to. I play like I want, when I want.
MoI wrote:Why is being self-inconsistent in the RVS inherently worse than out of RVS, which is your implication.
It's not. And I'll be the first to admit that my wagon and my subsequent pushing of the wagon was almost completely RVS driven. No better way to get out of RVS than a good ole wagon.
Zang's attack on the theLonging wagon is wrong. There's more reasoning on it than the Tasky wagon. But he seems to read VI ATM, so we'll see about that I guess.
VOTE: TheLonging
This is a good wagon.