Mad World: Time Travel Mafia (Game Over)

[gandalf5166]

VOTE: RC
I was reading a game he was in, and he was the king. Therefore, he must be scum in this game. That logic is not at all faulty. >.<

[Tasky]

UNVOTE: Seraphim
VOTE: ReaperCharlie

for posting stupid/funny pictures

[ReaperCharlie]

OMGUS! (both of you!!!)

But you're probably right, I probably am scum. I should probably read my role PM >.<

[I doubt it]

VOTE: gandalf5166

For having a four-digit number in your username. Seriously, that's not cool. How am I supposed to distinguish you from gandalf5165 and gandalf5167?

[Seraphim]

by the fact that he's gandalf5166 rather than aforementioned units 5165 and 5167.

also, more people should be voting Tasky for double-standards, BTW.

[ReaperCharlie]

Did Tasky seriously just join the site 2 days ago?

That's an alt, I'll stake a wager on it.

Unvote; Vote: Tasky

(trying to be tricksy, little hobbit? NObody trickses US)

[Karma]

unvote, vote: ReaperCharlie

I'm an alt too!

[Zang]

Hey everybody!

And VOTE: The Longing for having a moving avatar that's not as awesome as mine.

[TheLonging]

At this point, Tasky seems like a reasonable vote

[Tasky]

by the fact that he's gandalf5166 rather than aforementioned units 5165 and 5167.

also, more people should be voting Tasky for double-standards, BTW.

excuse my ignorance, what are double-standards?

Did Tasky seriously just join the site 2 days ago?

yep...

[youngminii]

let's have a good game and start by:

VOTE: Seraphim

for having changed his mind so soon after the game started

In the other game I just started with you, you changed your vote 4 times within the first half of the day (real time) and got very defensive about it. Something very suspicious about your play style.

UNVOTE: gandalf
VOTE: Tasky

[ReaperCharlie]

unvote, vote: ReaperCharlie

I'm an alt too!

Yeah, but your icon isn't trying to eat my soul. It's just trying to scramble my brain.

[Seraphim]

Basically, this:

let's have a good game and start by:

VOTE: Seraphim

for having changed his mind so soon after the game started

and then you switch your vote, 15 posts later:

UNVOTE: Seraphim
VOTE: ReaperCharlie

for posting stupid/funny pictures

Sounds like a double standard to me.

[Seraphim]

In other words, you accuse me of something and then proceed to do aforementioned thing in your next post. That's a double-standard, son, and in the RVS, it reeks.

In the other game I just started with you, you changed your vote 4 times within the first half of the day (real time) and got very defensive about it. Something very suspicious about your play style.

I was going to ask you about this, but then decided against it because it concerns an ongoing game, which you shouldn't talk about. However, I find it very odd you are using an ongoing game you just started to justify wagoning a player. His playstyle seeming "suspicious" in one game doesn't implicate him as scum in this one.

So, basically, do you find his play to be suspicious in this game or what?

[Zang]

Something very suspicious about your play style.

why is he scum because of his playstyle?

[ooba]

Ah... Are you telling me that you built a time machine... out of a DeLorean?

---

..] Vote Count [..

Zang (1)

- diginova

AlphaWerewolf (0)

MagnaOfIllusion (1)

- CallMeLiam

ReaperCharlie (3)

- gandalf5166, Tasky, Karma

curiouskarmadog (0)

GhostWriter (0)

Seraphim (0)

-

SharkFinn (0)

youngminii (0)

gandalf5166 (1)

- I doubt it

CallMeLiam (0)

Anon (0)

Karma (0)

-

Tasky (4)

- Seraphim, TheLonging, ReaperCharlie, youngminii

TheLonging (1)

- Zang

diginova (0)

Empking (0)

I doubt it (0)

Not voting (7)

- AlphaWerewolf, MagnaOfIllusion, curiouskarmadog, GhostWriter, SharkFinn, Anon, Empking

With 18 alive, 10 to lynch!

---

We are allowed to post during Twilight right? Just making sure

Yes. In case I am slow in posting a lynch scene, you can talk in the meanwhile.

[TheLonging]

I was going to ask you about this, but then decided against it because it concerns an ongoing game, which you shouldn't talk about. However, I find it very odd you are using an ongoing game you just started to justify wagoning a player. His playstyle seeming "suspicious" in one game doesn't implicate him as scum in this one.

So, basically, do you find his play to be suspicious in this game or what?

I guess he's trying to base it off the fact that he's contradicting himself/meta, which I can't really see (the meta part anyways), and for the contradicting thing, we should only use this game as a basis, not others (especially ongoing)

[youngminii]

Okay okay, forget I said anything then. What I meant was, he's very different in this game to another game, hence I find his play style in this game to be suspicious. But I shall stop relying on meta.

[Seraphim]

don't stop relying on meta, stop relying on ONGOING meta. Important difference. The info is useless unless you know his alignment.

Why aren't more people voting Tasky?

[SharkFinn]

don't stop relying on meta, stop relying on ONGOING meta. Important difference. The info is useless unless you know his alignment.

Why aren't more people voting Tasky?

Because I just got on and found out this game started.

Vote Tasky

for having double standards about changing minds.

[SharkFinn]

5 more to lynch Tasky (of course I doubt it will happen soon)

[TheLonging]

I don't rely on meta cause I've played too many games where meta basically helped town lose.

[curiouskarmadog]

vote Empking

because I would have /out-ed if I saw him join.

[gandalf5166]

Oh, I hadn't noticed that. Definitely UNVOTE: VOTE: Tasky, double standards are a serious offense.

[diginova]

L-4 on page two seems just a

little

excessive on page 2, doesn't it? I'll hold my vote until we hear from Tasky.