Mini 1018ÔÇôÔÇôDNA Evidence (Game Over)

[Prox]

Sorry, I had a flashback ^^

unvote; vote doombunny

Snow, doom; you get how I confuse the two.

Why did you only focus on that one person who confirmed and left?

I'm only trying to reason what we should do in this situation. If zwet announces his scan target, then at least the other guy will know the deal. That way, if zwet is killed, his scan doesn't beome worthless. If the other guy claims, we'll have 3 confirmed townies or 2 and a found scum. If we do nothing, there is little benefit unless one of the three is brought to L-1 today.

I can get the not claiming part, but I don't understand the waiting until the claim to announce the player scanned.

But whatever- that's zwet's and his associate's choice.

[Korashk]

oh, and

Unvote; Vote: Korashk

Why?

[Korashk]

Raccoons scream when you try and catch them. It sounds hilarious.

Haha, since replacing the traps we've caught two more raccoons, three cats (ours went after the cat food bait twice, and a stray), and a possum.

[Hrezs]

Vote:Korashk

holy crap that was a scummy reaction to a softpower claim

[iiiiiiq]

Yeah, sorry i was on a plane and i couldnt connect and stuff
imma try to be more active as of NOW

[pacman281292]

@DB: I got severely ninja'd.
OMG, this seems so messed up... Are we on RVS still? or not? And if not, reasons to the latest votes?

[Prox]

I think it's half and half?

I've explained my votes. Doombunny tunneled.

[don_johnson]

Claiming early was stupid. Announcing targets is more so. Roleclaims, however, are never really antitown. That's just crazy talk.

[Katsuki]

OMG, this seems so messed up... Are we on RVS still? or not? And if not, reasons to the latest votes?

Is this some weak attempt at playing clueless?


In other news,

unvote, vote korashk

. Nice slip.

[Katsuki]

@Pacman: To play along with your cluelessness, RVS ended before you even posted last, and was essentially non-existnt.

[Prox]

I don't think...Ah, I'll wait till Korashk says something.

[Shepherd_of_Wolves]

VOTE COUNT 1.3

With 12 players 7 votes lynches.

Deadline

:

No set deadline.

Count

don_johnson

(0)

Doombunny9

(1)

Prox

drmyshottyizsik

(1)

LynchMePls

Hrezs

(0)

iiiiiiq

(0)

Katsuki

(0)

Korashk

(3)

zwetschenwasser, Hrezs, Katsuki

LynchMePls

(0)

Mysterio

(1)

don_johnson

pacman281292

(0)

Prox

(2)

Mysterio, pacman281292

zwetschenwasser

(1)

drmyshottyizsik

Not Voting

(3)

iiiiiiq
Korashk
Doombunny9

Opening Post – For links to all Vote Counts.

[drmyshottyizsik]

Unvote, cause of his claim

[Prox]

Unvote, cause of his claim

Late.

unvote; vote shotty

[drmyshottyizsik]

Prox that was an awefully eager vote, it was late because I slept on the idea and just got up

[Prox]

Prox that was an

awfully

eager vote, it was late because I slept on the idea and just got up

Eager. Right.

Why did you have to sleep on the idea before unvoting him?

[drmyshottyizsik]

Because I like thinking and not jumping on people on a whim, also goes for jumping off of people

[Prox]

Because I like thinking and not jumping on people on a whim, also goes for jumping off of people

Whims are fine at the start of the game.

You showed that you believed zwet's claim and yet did not unvote. I do not understand.

[Korashk]

Claiming early was stupid. Announcing targets is more so. Roleclaims, however, are never really antitown. That's just crazy talk.

Unsolicited claims are pointless without justification, especially semi-power roles, all it does is give the Mafia more information. This is a bad thing.

[Doombunny9]

Why did you only focus on that one person who confirmed and left?

The thing that made me interested in him rather than the others were that (like kat) he already had some stuff to go on and talk about including questions asked by you that he could have answered. Instead however, he just confirmed and didn't talk about anything.

OMG, this seems so messed up... Are we on RVS still? or not? And if not, reasons to the latest votes?

I'd say we're about out. I'm currently not voting anyone but my reason for voting hrez is above

Anyway, my top 3 scumpicks right now would be (in order): Prox, kora, pacman. Prox seems to be eagerly rolefishing: "Since zwet has already claimed, then it makes sense for the other guy to do so, too. Like 2 innocent childs and a free scan." and he seems to be testing the waters to see who would make a good (mis)lynch. Voting and unvoting on a whim at this point is fine but doing it because of extremely weak reasons is not.

Vote: Prox

[don_johnson]

Because I like thinking and not jumping on people on a whim, also goes for jumping off of people

Yet u jumped on him quickly and in response to what u thought was a softclaim. This quote is 100% BS.

vote: drmyshotty

[don_johnson]

Claiming early was stupid. Announcing targets is more so. Roleclaims, however, are never really antitown. That's just crazy talk.

Unsolicited claims are pointless without justification, especially semi-power roles, all it does is give the Mafia more information. This is a bad thing.

Proof is in the pudding. U can't really judge the pudding while the bakers still stirring. Time will tell.

[Prox]

That's silly. It makes sense for the other half-cop to claim now that zwet has. I'm being accused of rolefishing on this, but no one has told me why this opinion is wrong.

How am I testing the waters to see who would make a good mislynch? I'm trying to evoke responses to get the game moving.

If my vote for someone has a weak reason, shouldn't I change it anyways? And how is it scummy to do so anyway? Isn't voting at a whim the

same

as voting for little reason?


Oh crap. More metaphors.

[Korashk]

That's silly. It makes sense for the other half-cop to claim now that zwet has. I'm being accused of rolefishing on this, but no one has told me why this opinion is wrong.

The doctor can't protect two people, assuming there are any protective roles in this game at all.

If my vote for someone has a weak reason, shouldn't I change it anyways? And how is it scummy to do so anyway? Isn't voting at a whim the

same

as voting for little reason?

Voting for weak reasons is not all that helpful to anyone.

[Prox]

They incur responses.