jimfinn wrote:Let us assume for for the sake of negation that Katsuki is truly Mario and is a town-aligned role. The role of Mario in this game would likely be a PR. Any person with any knowledge of the flavor ought to assume that. Therefore, to claim Mario without full-claiming would likely draw a NK, which would cause the death of one of the town's PRs. Therefore, no pro-town player with any common sense would possibly perform such an action. Katsuki is most likely scum, and even if town, a better policy lynch than DMSIS because Kat has already performed a blatantly anti-town action.
More role-speculation please.
This is the wonderful thing about D1 claims, the reactions you draw from it. This post itself is not entirely pro-town. Who are you to assume that my role is anyways? Essentially you've used this post to 1. Paint me as blatently anti-town to push for lynch and 2. Role-fishing for me to "prove" that I'm blah blah blah. I may anything, yet I may be nothing
Responding to jim last post, soft-claiming being completely pro-town? Not really. Blatently anti-town? Definately not.
@Mothrax: Zwet almost always claims something D1, didn't you know?...
Analysis of players thus far on wagon:
Vote: Calcifer
: Still probably scum, terrible case and so called evidence re: "Kat 'never' policy votes". Gandalf has already stated in this thread that that is not true. Still has yet to explain how that is "kat-is-scum" evidence too, just constantly flings around "kat is scum".
Jim: Def not a town read thus far
Gandalf: I can understand his reaction, neutral leaning town.
CMAR: No read
Mothrax: I don't think he is scum thus far... yet. Comes in page 3 to vote shotty. <-- Not town. Possible scum.
No read on others.
If anything, I would be willing to put my neck in the noose D2 if we lynch Calc today. Andrius is playing scum meta.
*coughcoughTheLongingcough*
That's newb-scum. I'd like to think you're better than that.
