I am less confused but .
Actively lurking and commenting from the peanut gallery?
Also. Explain this.
Nexus wrote:I remember now. I thought Equinox had more votes, so counted up. Then saw your name, and made the mistake.
VOTE: Equinox
Nexus wrote:I remember now. I thought Equinox had more votes, so counted up. Then saw your name, and made the mistake.
VOTE: Equinox
Antihero wrote:Ummm... what?Sevei wrote:You quote Singer out of order and then dismiss her calling you out about it; I have read and reread that post of yours and it still looks like a deliberate misrep.Not sure what you're not getting. Especially since you just admitted to your quotes accidentally being out of order...So, it's my fault that people might not actually read my post?Sevei wrote:Really? I think it holds up as is because when people list quotes, sometimes others don't go back and read the originals. Therefore, listing someone's quotes out of order to make an argument is misrepping. Can you explain why you disagree?Antihero wrote:
That would only hold up if I actually put the quotes in the order they appeared.lol. Really? You're arguing that even though YOU put posts out of order, so it's not YOUR fault that people don't go check to see if you're really posting legitimate quotes, etc? While I agree that everyone should be accountable for double checking people's posts and stuff, you now have two people who called you out on misrepping someone (intentionally or not). This is the worst counter-argument I've ever seen.Antihero wrote:singer wrote:...what?
I'm not pushing Equinox...it was a joke about an RVS vote...This is what singer said when I said that her equinox push doesn't have any merit.
Right. That so called "push" was nothing. It was an RVS vote. You then quote this next (I'll address the quote itself before the part in orange that you're explaining it with.):
Really? What's this then:singer wrote:Why would your answer influence others' answers? I see no reason why you shouldn't answer your questions now, unless you're just pretending that you actually had a reason for not answering your own reasonably standard questions.This was mutually exclusive from the random reason I voted her before. She responded with "I'll answer my own questions last" (or something to that extend) to someone else's post. THIS was my response to something NEW.
This is what she said previously. I put the original quote first and then pointed out something she said previously. I guess you I could have posted them in reverse order, but I think that would have been pretty awkward. Please tell me how changing the order subverts the meaning of the post.
Well, I just did, by explaining that. But let me explain further: you're not getting it. If you see my posts in ISO, I can understand how itmightlook somewhat like what you're getting at...? But 1. You need to look at it in context, and you wouldn't have had anything to ISO me for if you didn't see it in context originally, and 2. You do not EVER make a point where the order of the posts ABSOLUTELY matter, and then say "well I don't see how it changes the meaning." Of course it changes the meaning. If you were simply giving examples, I can see why it wouldn't matter, because examples are mutually exclusive from one another. But since you're claiming that my posts are "pushing" a matter, which quite frankly, I'm fairly unconcerned with now, that is indicative of my posting order/responses, then, yes, it matters a lot.singer wrote:For the record, I never insisted on anything, nor did I press the matter in any way, shape, or form.
Welcome those who have had yet to post, and have now posted!I stand by what I said. I wasn't insisting. I made an RVS vote for the random reason that Equinox hadn't answered her own questions yet. Then in response to her sayingwhyshe hadn't answered her questions, I said "why not?" Then I said ^this.
Backtracking is badI didn't backtrack. Not sure where you got the impression that I did. Oh wait, you're scum.
Any more confusion?
I never admitted to accidentally posting the quotes out of order.singer wrote:lol. Really? You're arguing that even though YOU put posts out of order, so it's not YOUR fault that people don't go check to see if you're really posting legitimate quotes, etc? While I agree that everyone should be accountable for double checking people's posts and stuff, you now have two people who called you out on misrepping someone (intentionally or not). This is the worst counter-argument I've ever seen.
OK, call me crazy, but the diction of this doesn't sound like playfull randomness.singer wrote:I made an RVS vote for the random reason that Equinox hadn't answered her own questions yet. Then in response to her saying why she hadn't answered her questions,
Are you going to now try to deny that there wasn't even a hint of accusation in there?singer wrote:Why would your answer influence others' answers? I see no reason why you shouldn't answer your questions now,unless you're just pretending that you actually had a reason for not answering your own reasonably standard questions.
Antihero wrote:First off, you're taking about twice as much space as you need to make your "point."I read this as, damnit, she's right, now how to counter this...
I never admitted to accidentally posting the quotes out of order.singer wrote:lol. Really? You're arguing that even though YOU put posts out of order, so it's not YOUR fault that people don't go check to see if you're really posting legitimate quotes, etc? While I agree that everyone should be accountable for double checking people's posts and stuff, you now have two people who called you out on misrepping someone (intentionally or not). This is the worst counter-argument I've ever seen.Really?Antihero wrote:Hmmm... The cut and paste fail really mucks up the post. Let's fix that.This is where I acknowledged the mistake. You're not reacting at all like someone who genuinely made a mistake, though.
What's with the nitpicking about the order of the quotes? They were that way because of how I organize my posts; it's not a scumtell, stop finagling it into one.I'm only commenting on this because of the ridiculousness of it. You're either a really bad town, or even worse scum who's trying to pull off not understanding why the order mattersin this case.OK, call me crazy, but the diction of this doesn't sound like playfull randomness.singer wrote:I made an RVS vote for the random reason that Equinox hadn't answered her own questions yet. Then in response to her saying why she hadn't answered her questions,You're gunna have to explain what you mean by "the diction part." I'm not following what exactly you're pointing out here, since the post I'm referring to was literally just an RVS vote...not even on Equinox, no less. You also quoted a fragment...was that to make a point, too? Or did you just fail to realize it didn't make sense since you cut off the rest of the sentence from the start?Are you going to now try to deny that there wasn't even a hint of accusation in there?singer wrote:Why would your answer influence others' answers? I see no reason why you shouldn't answer your questions now,unless you're just pretending that you actually had a reason for not answering your own reasonably standard questions.There was a hint. You're right. The first hint ever of accusing her of suspicious activity-IN RESPONSE TO HER LACK OF ANSWERS (I put it in caps not because I'm yelling out of frustration, but because I don't trust your ability to figure it out yourself). My point was that you were trying to make it seem like I was pushing something, or accusing her or something before it even mattered, when it's very clear that I wasn't.
Alright, just keep flattering yourself. It's not that I want to freaking tear my eyes out every time I see a text wall, I just can't stand your rightness.First off, you're taking about twice as much space as you need to make your "point." I read this as, damnit, she's right, now how to counter this...
That was an honest copy/paste mistake, and that should be obvious from the post. You are really not building a case off of THAT are you?This is where I acknowledged the mistake. You're not reacting at all like someone who genuinely made a mistake, though.
OK, that was uncalled for.There was a hint. You're right. The first hint ever of accusing her of suspicious activity-IN RESPONSE TO HER LACK OF ANSWERS (I put it in caps not because I'm yelling out of frustration, but because I don't trust your ability to figure it out yourself).
Call me scum all you want, but calling me stupid = not coolsingersigner wrote:(I put it in caps not because I'm yelling out of frustration, but because I don't trust your ability to figure it out yourself).
No I'm not. Like I said, I understand and acknowledge that it was a mistake. But then you reacted like there was nothing to come of it, when honestly, mistake or not, until it was pointed out, you didn't make a big deal out of it. The reason I insulted your reading comprehension is because I, and Sevei, both explained to you why it was scummy, and yet you STILL didn't acknowledge that posting those quotes out of order AND out of context was making some hell of a case that didn't exist.Antihero wrote:That was an honest copy/paste mistake, and that should be obvious from the post. You are really not building a case off of THAT are you?singersigner wrote: This is where I acknowledged the mistake. You're not reacting at all like someone who genuinely made a mistake, though.
singersigner wrote:No I'm not. Like I said, I understand and acknowledge that it was a mistake. But then you reacted like there was nothing to come of it, when honestly, mistake or not, until it was pointed out, you didn't make a big deal out of it.Antihero wrote:That was an honest copy/paste mistake, and that should be obvious from the post. You are really not building a case off of THAT are you?singersigner wrote: This is where I acknowledged the mistake. You're not reacting at all like someone who genuinely made a mistake, though.The reason I insulted your reading comprehension is because I, and Sevei, both explained to you why it was scummy, and yet you STILL didn't acknowledge that posting those quotes out of order AND out of context was making some hell of a case that didn't exist.oh. /slaps self. Yeah, I just copied and pasted something, forgot that I did so, and proceeded to do it again, resulting in a random sentence floating around. I guess I should preview my post next time. I didn't think that's what sevei was referring to though... :S
I apologize that it came off as attacking your character.It was about your lack of responding to the one critical detail that makes you look scummy as hell to me.(It's OK, my playstyle is a bit inflammatory)
Lowell wrote:Early guesses. Equi is town, singer not so much. unvote, vote singer
What is there to explain? I had intended my vote to be on Equinox for a RVS wagon. I was counting the number of votes on each player, and read NS last, so accidentally voted for him. As soon as I recognised my mistakes, I voted Equinox.Sevei wrote:UNvote
I am less confused but .
Vote: Nexus
Actively lurking and commenting from the peanut gallery?
Also. Explain this.Nexus wrote:I remember now. I thought Equinox had more votes, so counted up. Then saw your name, and made the mistake.
VOTE: Equinox
Any reason you say this besides the fact that Lowell called me town?Zed wrote:Now I'll share my hunch. Lowell and Antihero are scum buddies. Antihero was under pressure so Lowell is trying to divert attention while Antihero gets things under control again. Lowell is not voting for me though, because he doesn't want to lead the town in lynching me.
Oh, and you never explained your vote on singer.
I'm getting that mucky OMGUS feeling right about now.Zed wrote:Now I'll share my hunch. Lowell and Antihero are scum buddies. Antihero was under pressure so Lowell is trying to divert attention while Antihero gets things under control again. Lowell is not voting for me though, because he doesn't want to lead the town in lynching me.
Oh, and you never explained your vote on singer.