Open 260 - Tit For Tat - Game Over

Gonzoooo · Post Post #25 (ISO) » Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:03 am

Are you guys losing it? Why are you not voting for don johnson? Obv scum is obv....vote accordingly.

Vote Count

Consigliere (1) - mallowgeno
Xenophon (1) - saporovirus
mallowgeno (1) - lewarcher82
lewarcher82 (1) - Zhero
don_johnson (1) - Gonzoooo
Gonzoooo (1) - implosion
implosion (1) - werewolf555
werewolf555 (1) - don_johnson
smashbro_of_the_SSS (1) - Powerrox93

Not Voting (3) - Consigliere, Xenophon, smashbro_of_the_SSS

With 12 alive it is 7 to lynch. The deadline is set for the end of November 21st, PST.

Consigliere · Post Post #26 (ISO) » Mon Nov 01, 2010 3:02 am

/confirm

Hoooowwwwwwdddyyyyy hooooooo everybody!

Your new all-time-favorite mafia player has arrived to bring light to your darkest days...happiness to your otherwise dreary world....intellectual food for your starving spirit.

Vote:andrew94

Because you dun pissed me off and well...."When in Rome"

Consigliere · Post Post #27 (ISO) » Mon Nov 01, 2010 3:04 am

mallowgeno wrote:
Vote Consigliere for not confirming

Can't a man just have a holiday weekend?

Come on now.

I'm having a gigantic sugar hangover right now and this is how I'm treated....No glass of water...No "It'll be better after you get a little further from it...Don't mind the 2 bags of sugar hell in your fridge that will be haunting you later....Just focus on the now"....NOOOOOO....It's "ZOMG Consigliere didn't confirm...KILL KILL KILL"

Horror movie indeed.

lewarcher82 · Post Post #28 (ISO) » Mon Nov 01, 2010 3:43 am

"ZOMG Consigliere didn't confirm...KILL KILL KILL"

Unvote; Vote: Consigliere

don_johnson · Post Post #29 (ISO) » Mon Nov 01, 2010 7:24 am

unvote, vote lewarcher

for excessive use of smilies. and yes, this is serious.

saporovirus · Post Post #30 (ISO) » Mon Nov 01, 2010 7:40 am

UNVOTE: xenophon
VOTE: Gonzooo for his subjective style of journalism.

mallowgeno · Post Post #31 (ISO) » Mon Nov 01, 2010 7:51 am

vote lewarcher

I agree with DJ

lewarcher82 · Post Post #32 (ISO) » Mon Nov 01, 2010 8:30 am

don_johnson wrote:
unvote, vote lewarcher

for excessive use of smilies. and yes, this is serious.

You are so right, smilies are a blatant scumtell. I have read somewhere chimps are smart, should't have underestimated you.

saporovirus · Post Post #33 (ISO) » Mon Nov 01, 2010 8:41 am

Consigliere wrote:
mallowgeno wrote:
Vote Consigliere for not confirming
Can't a man just have a holiday weekend?

Come on now.

I'm having a gigantic sugar hangover right now and this is how I'm treated....No glass of water...No "It'll be better after you get a little further from it...Don't mind the 2 bags of sugar hell in your fridge that will be haunting you later....Just focus on the now"....NOOOOOO....It's "ZOMG Consigliere didn't confirm...KILL KILL KILL"

Horror movie indeed.

You made your choice!

smashbro_of_the_SSS · Post Post #34 (ISO) » Mon Nov 01, 2010 9:00 am

vote: don_johnson

for being the second person to be the second person voting for someone.

Powerrox93 wrote:VOTE: smashbro_of_the_SSS for not posting yet.

What say you now?!?

Powerrox93 · Post Post #35 (ISO) » Mon Nov 01, 2010 9:03 am

smashbro_of_the_SSS wrote:
Powerrox93 wrote:VOTE: smashbro_of_the_SSS for not posting yet.
What say you now?!?

I say UNVOTE: as we might get a unnecessarily long RVS party in here

implosion · Post Post #36 (ISO) » Mon Nov 01, 2010 9:17 am

Whoa... so many unvotes and revotes.

May as well start the discussion with a question.
@don: are you serious in saying that that vote is serious? If so, how is lewarcher's post scummy? I sort of see where you're coming from, and I would understand that as a justification for a random vote - but if it's really serious, then how is that scummy?

Gonzoooo · Post Post #37 (ISO) » Mon Nov 01, 2010 9:21 am

@implosion - so I take it you don't feel that lewarcher's smilies were excessive?

saporovirus · Post Post #38 (ISO) » Mon Nov 01, 2010 9:43 am

His smilies were excessive. But that might just be a sign of mental instability, not organized crime.

implosion · Post Post #39 (ISO) » Mon Nov 01, 2010 9:45 am

Gonzoooo wrote:@implosion - so I take it you don't feel that lewarcher's smilies were excessive?

I don't see it as a tell, if that's what you're asking. Aesthetically, maybe, but I don't see how that's relevant to the game.

don_johnson · Post Post #40 (ISO) » Mon Nov 01, 2010 10:28 am

imo, one of the biggest challenges facing a scum player is "fitting in" during the rvs. i think scum may tend to "overcompensate for randomness" in their votes. i.e. they have to try a little harder than everyone else to make their votes look fun and random. not only was the smiley use excessive here, but it was also his

second

vote in the rvs. also, if you'll notice, the joke doesn't even fit right, as consig clearly confirmed in the post lewarcher is responding to. so yeah, its a serious vote. is it a "super serious not gonna ever change my vote no matter what happens" vote? i'll let you figure that one out.

saporovirus · Post Post #41 (ISO) » Mon Nov 01, 2010 11:06 am

Gonzoooo was my second vote in the RVS. But Lewarcher actually did respond to your vote with more sarcasm than was warranted. BUT mallowgeno did switch from consigliere to lewarcher in a parrot-like manner.

Zhero · Post Post #42 (ISO) » Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:17 pm

Don makes a good point, and lewarcher's reaction in interesting.

Saporovirus, why two rvs votes?

saporovirus · Post Post #43 (ISO) » Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:31 pm

Because I wanted to make a Hunter S Thompson joke.

Gonzoooo · Post Post #44 (ISO) » Mon Nov 01, 2010 3:33 pm

^This lady is the most pro-town only behind me.

implosion · Post Post #45 (ISO) » Mon Nov 01, 2010 4:24 pm

Zhero wrote:Don makes a good point, and lewarcher's reaction in interesting.

Saporovirus, why two rvs votes?

Why do you address this question only at saporovirus? don also did (though he explained it) as did mallow and lewarcher. And speaking of which, why did these two people make two RVS votes?

werewolf555 · Post Post #46 (ISO) » Mon Nov 01, 2010 4:39 pm

implosion wrote:
Zhero wrote:Don makes a good point, and lewarcher's reaction in interesting.

Saporovirus, why two rvs votes?
Why do you address this question only at saporovirus? don also did (though he explained it) as did mallow and lewarcher. And speaking of which, why did these two people make two RVS votes?

Maybe they like to vote-hop, or are trying to "play-along" with the town

lewarcher82 · Post Post #47 (ISO) » Mon Nov 01, 2010 11:32 pm

implosion wrote:
Zhero wrote:Don makes a good point, and lewarcher's reaction in interesting.

Saporovirus, why two rvs votes?
Why do you address this question only at saporovirus? don also did (though he explained it) as did mallow and lewarcher. And speaking of which, why did these two people make two RVS votes?

cuz I was joking, you genius. And I wanna go back to mallowgeno. Normally, I would be afraid to look scummy for switching back, but since my vote on consigliere was evidently a joke, I do not mind.

Unvote; vote: mallowgeno

and yes, after what happened it is not random anymore. He jumped on me, and I was voting him before the Simliesgate, so I think he knew I may have switched back and he is trying to prevent me from doing so.

Zhero · Post Post #48 (ISO) » Tue Nov 02, 2010 3:06 am

implosion wrote:Why do you address this question only at saporovirus? don also did (though he explained it) as did mallow and lewarcher. And speaking of which, why did these two people make two RVS votes?

Don's and mallow's votes were apparently serious, and I'd already mentioned lew.

saporovirus wrote:Because I wanted to make a Hunter S Thompson joke.

Cool.

Consigliere · Post Post #49 (ISO) » Tue Nov 02, 2010 7:03 am

Can we get a count up on in here? Votes flying everywhere.

Speaking of...Is it protocol for mods only to do votes, or can we little people bust them out? I have yet to see a player do one...so I'm assuming the former.

I had to google Hunter S. Thompson...Does this make me a dumbass?

A simple yes or no will do...No need to throw salt on the wound.